TIAI January 2
<!-- m -->http://www.tmz.com/2010/11/03/oprah-mic ... n-episode/<!-- m -->
MJ Fans: Oprah's Molestation Show Is No 'Coincidence'
11/3/2010 4:30 PM PDT by TMZ Staff
An official MJ fan group ain't buying Oprah's "purely coincidental" excuse -- telling us, they are "angry and disappointed" that she's airing her interview with MJ's kids days after a special on child molestation.
A rep for the Official Michael Jackson Fans of Southern California tells TMZ, “We are both angry and disappointed in Oprah’s constant need to reference child molestation shows prior to airing Michael Jackson related episodes. Her tone seems to speak volumes.”
Oprah called the whole thing "purely coincidental" ... but MJ fans aren't convinced. The rep adds, “How can something so obvious be a coincidence?"
As we previously reported, Oprah's big interview with Michael Jackson's children is scheduled to air next Monday -- three days after Friday's big show ... entitled "200 Adult Men Who Were Molested Come Forward."
MJ Fans: Oprah's Molestation Show Is No 'Coincidence'
11/3/2010 4:30 PM PDT by TMZ Staff
An official MJ fan group ain't buying Oprah's "purely coincidental" excuse -- telling us, they are "angry and disappointed" that she's airing her interview with MJ's kids days after a special on child molestation.
A rep for the Official Michael Jackson Fans of Southern California tells TMZ, “We are both angry and disappointed in Oprah’s constant need to reference child molestation shows prior to airing Michael Jackson related episodes. Her tone seems to speak volumes.”
Oprah called the whole thing "purely coincidental" ... but MJ fans aren't convinced. The rep adds, “How can something so obvious be a coincidence?"
As we previously reported, Oprah's big interview with Michael Jackson's children is scheduled to air next Monday -- three days after Friday's big show ... entitled "200 Adult Men Who Were Molested Come Forward."
"For we wrestle not against flesh and blood, but against principalities, against powers, against the rulers of the darkness of this world, against spiritual wickedness in high places."
Comments
The episode the article refers to "200 Adult Men Who Were Molested Come Forward," aired on November 5th.
Remember remember the fifth of November.
I don't think this re-direct has anything to do with molestation but with eerie coincidences. And it makes me wonder even more just how much Oprah is involved in the hoax.
Indeed...
The Oprah show was definitely not a cooincidence <!-- s;) -->;)<!-- s;) --> I agree!
Molestation show on the 5th November (V Day) --- 3 days before the interview with MJ's Kids ( 3 turns 6 into 9 - reversal of power)
I think that this redirect tells us that the Vendetta we are going to witness in 2011 has got a lot to do with the molestation charges. "They" tried to destroy him by going for what was at the heart of his being, his Love for children. They nearly succeeded but He somehow survived and NOW, He is going for "them".
We are with You Michael... all the way!
With L.O.V.E
I think TS wants to point out that indeed, if something is SO obvious, that it can never be a coincidence anymore. And with that not only the Oprah issue is meant.
I think there is also a possibility that Jordy may start talking soon and explain the world that Mike never touched him in an inappropriate way and that the whole thing was pure extortion. And I really hope he will.
"For we wrestle not against flesh and blood, but against principalities, against powers, against the rulers of the darkness of this world, against spiritual wickedness in high places."
In other words, "Oprah is all of a sudden taking huge interest in the life and affairs of Michael Jackson, two years after his death... and it's not about Conrad Murray. You think this is a coincidence?"
To me this is screaming partnership. I think they're helping each other. Michael gets additional help with the hoax and air-time (keeping him relevant), Oprah gets more viewers. Win-win scenario.
JMHO, of course.
"For we wrestle not against flesh and blood, but against principalities, against powers, against the rulers of the darkness of this world, against spiritual wickedness in high places."
Trust Oprah with knowing he's alive or... Are you referring to something else?
In knowing/helping/being involved. Everything that has been discussed. I don't see why he would decide to work with her on this, besides the fact that she has a lot of viewers. She openly doubted his innocence, even after he was acquited. I just don't see it. But maybe someone is able to convince me otherwise...
"For we wrestle not against flesh and blood, but against principalities, against powers, against the rulers of the darkness of this world, against spiritual wickedness in high places."
I don't believe it was a coincedence.
Arvizo's vs MJ was hot news and Oprah jumped on it .
People always remember the bad stuff.
So she did it again.
This?
Now what? We get another Oprah show again?
( Oh Noes!!)
1. "We" do not know first hand what Michael would do or not do
2. "We" do not know first hand who He trust and who He does not trust
3. "We" do not know what is at play with the Hoax and how much risks he is prepared to take
4. "We" have already seen some unexpected media deals/associations: TMZ and Sony comes to mind
5. Oprah is influential and has a larger audience than most
6. Nobody expects an association with Oprah due to her previous comments
7. Oprah is on the last year of her show (Last one is on 9/9/11?) and will want to go out on a Bang!
8. Oprah has shown some regrets on her previous stance on Michael (Interview from September 2009)
9. For what we know Oprah may see Michael's "take-over" plans as an opportunity not to be missed.
With L.O.V.E
I thought about it some more... We had the Vendetta video for a few days. Maybe Oprah is the first this year who will 'get her share'? Oprah exposed?
"For we wrestle not against flesh and blood, but against principalities, against powers, against the rulers of the darkness of this world, against spiritual wickedness in high places."
Agreed on the points, but I have never seen her regret anything (do you have a link?) and she did do it again. Again she linked molestation to Michael by her 'coincidental' planning. I agree it could all be a smokescreen, but there is just something about Oprah I just don't trust. I must say that I would love to be proven wrong here, because it might me useful to have someone like her on your side, but I'm just not sure. Maybe she should make an episode to show the whole world that he has always been innocent. Maybe I would change my mind after that.
I get your points as well. Oprah planning the molestation show on the 5th, we remember because it was right before the MJ episode, and Oprah will expose Evan Chandler/The Arvizos and maybe even Jordy speaking up on Oprah. Remember, remember. I do get it, I just need to see for myself first.
"For we wrestle not against flesh and blood, but against principalities, against powers, against the rulers of the darkness of this world, against spiritual wickedness in high places."
Michael is NOT a child molester. One can see how those who were molested reacted in her show.
Why not telling the truth? Why not pointing fingers at those who in the past and the present harmed Michael? Could no one see the trauma in Michael´s eyes as a child?
And after?
And the latest years?
Sad eyes....so sad eyes <!-- s:( -->:(<!-- s:( -->
If Gema is the common denominator in many photos of Micahel, sad eyes, Oprah contribute much at all the damage they did to Michael and that still today people still remember
Btw: Did you all notice the time it was posted? 4:30 (that's a seven for y'a) on 11/3 (that is 14- doube 7) -- 777 (but of course, I see sevens everywhere now, so don't mind me... <!-- s;) -->;)<!-- s;) --> )
I am also torn on the Oprah issue. For years I was all up against her and her blatant disregard for the truth. Even up to maybe a week ago, I would have totally agreed with Souza. Now, I am wavering. For the following reasons:
1) Her recent interest in Michael is just too obvious. All of a sudden she has Lisa, then the family, Jackie... Ok, I could argue (and I do argue with myself- it is a shrink hazard), that she is a greedy vampire after money. She could be one of the very people Lisa Marie pointed out.
2) Her incessant emphasis on the molestation charges and the drug use: At first I thought, what a bitch, she is constantly bringing that up- what is her deal? If she was not interested what else Lisa or Katherine had to say, why do the interview?- Possible answer: money and ratings. (sigh- is nothing easy here??). However, WHAT if she keeps harping on those two issues to call attention to the molestation charges -which no doubt in my mind are fuel that has energized Michael in so many ways, as his whole world, his believes, his trust, his security, his emotional and physical well being, his family were all brought to the brink. And of course, the drug use...
3) Michael seems include people on the hoax who are thus redeeming themselves in a way (Joe, Jermaine, possibly Lisa Marie, and possibly Oprah, to name some).
Or, I could just be way off, and like Souza pointed out, Oprah is just one of the first to be hit hard for all the blatant nonsense. I know this post is not utterly helpful, but being the eternal libra, I always seem to be able to see both sides of a case... <!-- s:) -->:)<!-- s:) -->