ELIMS
mjjamm
Posts: 143
This is concering the Otwo Michael, in this post I will prove it was Michael
FIRST Otwo MIchael: NOTICE HOW HIS LIP GOES LOWER ON ONE SIDE:
NOW HERES MICHAEL IN PUBLIC, NOTICE THEY ALL ALSO HAVE A CROOKED SMILE
FIRST Otwo MIchael: NOTICE HOW HIS LIP GOES LOWER ON ONE SIDE:
NOW HERES MICHAEL IN PUBLIC, NOTICE THEY ALL ALSO HAVE A CROOKED SMILE
Comments
I have to agree with Sind. To me it doesn't look the same either.
Did MJ have his own teeth or he was wearing porcelain crowns?
And no I haven't,yet as soon as I am finished compiling I will do and link you to the thread.Not a problem
I can't see why he wouldn't of had his own teeth-BUT he might have had to have them altered because of his other cosmetic procedures.
Compare the second and the third photos which mjjamm posted: you can see that Michael's facial muscles work/move the same way as they worked when he was younger. This cannot be imitated IMO.
Btw. his teeth looks the same to me too.
And last but not least, you look a little different on every photo or even video. It depends on the light, on the angle etc. I know you guys know it, I don't have to explain it, I'm just saying <!-- s:) -->:)<!-- s:) -->
Just watch this Ebony photo, does Michael's smile look as it generally used to look? I think it looks way less a typical Michael-smile than as Michael smiles at the O2.
The man at the 02 had more against than for him being Michael than just a smile.
No one saw MJ in 2009 before the 02-which was done on purpose to make this come into question.
You must look at the other factors too though,
Hair,hand movements,voice,accent,HANDS AND NAILS,actions and body language,the walk from the car into the 02 or should I say swagger and bounce,the 02 MJ does not have Michael's lip scar.
Nothing about the 02 MJ...is MJ.
Infact nothing about the entire conference was real...well sort of..there appears to be be two very different stage set ups in a number of photographs lurking about.
Not to mention the fact out of all the hundreds of people there with phones,cameras,etc....next to no photo's from the fans point of view exist.
Then you have the photos that were re-released in Dec 09 with the real MJ's head photoshopped on instead..you can quite clearly see the difference.
Like I say when I have compiled my fact file I will present it.I'm a perfectionist so until I have everything in it...i'm holding on to it.
Just don't base your entire beliefs on one thing.
The hands give it away <!-- s;) -->;)<!-- s;) -->
as I am a person who first looks at teeth nose and eyes in a person, I must say that his teeth look all natural, with probably some implants or little crowns on his back teeth (because on the front teeth I can't notice it) recently, as when you are passing your 40s it's pretty hard to have your teeth as when you were 20. In my opinion, yes, his teeth are all natural, at least his front ones
But about "hand movements,voice,accent actions and body language,the walk from the car into the 02 or should I say swagger and bounce", I recommend you to read this thread:
<!-- l -->viewtopic.php?f=36&t=9453<!-- l -->
I found it very possible that this what happened when I read that.
MJ had beautiful teeth so I can't understand why he would have crowns but then again he had/has a beautiful face but that didn't stop him changing it.
Even if the double is using a fasad of teeth to look as MJ, MJ has the natural ones. IDK, may be with a photoshop program one can light up the teeth and see if they change colour between doubles? Teeht reacts to light in different ways.
Natural teeth have a specific translucidity and you won't find a person who has all his natural teeth having all the same texture and translucidity. This is how you spot a crown- by its texture.
I searhed to show us what I am talking about
Crowns:
Natural: - Michael has gorgeous teeth but here's an usual example of natural teeth and how their translucidity look if you have a HQ close up
A ceramic tooth is not as translucent as a bone tooth and will react to light differently.
@Tarja, was it you the one working as a designer? Do you have the tools to alter the light in order to see if the teeth of the "O2 MJ´s" are corresponding to each other?
You would have to get an original photograph to work from.
Good point.
I guess we will neer know. Even the original could have been manipulated to create the double controversy.
Even if Mike himself would come out and say he was O2 dude, he should have to prove it because I would call BS. I agree with Sin, there is nothing about this guy that even makes me think it's him. Everything screams prostetic make-up to me and MJ behind the curtain directing this circus.The mannerisms and voice could have been intentionally weird if it was MJ himself, but the mouth does not match and to me that's a dead giveaway. I don't look at teeth because they are probably false and scars can be made with prostetic make-up.
"For we wrestle not against flesh and blood, but against principalities, against powers, against the rulers of the darkness of this world, against spiritual wickedness in high places."Yes, I work with photo edition since 10 years - not as my job but as a hobby sort to say. If you want me to help you with something, show me
Michael must have had an on the spot nose job/St Tropez tan done and then had it wiped off mid speech without anyone seeing ORRRRRR it was these guys realising someone over did it with everything so shit...better make it look more like MJ...
My bet is on the table full of computer photoshop nerds working away at them..
The chin,nose,hands...everything is WRONG wrong wrong.
and Just to show you what else I was talking about earlier,
Isn't it a shame that all those people and the people behind them lost their footage/usb leads to upload all the photos and filming....all those hundreds of thousands of pictures taken...and none of them made it to google images.
I've got more footage uploaded on the net from the people who went to my shows I used to do than what's up from this 02 nonsense.
I can go on and on