can't wait to see what happens with the redirects of may 10 & 12. i hope it doesn't end up like the " mike will be back by the end of 2012 -- NO MIKE, NO EXPLANATION, NO NOTHING!! oh, but we did get a houdini (?) disappearing trick. >:( not that i want to jump too deep into your shit but, had u came back with SOMETHING at the end of 2012 it would have helped ur credibility. otherwise, u r just talking loud & saying nothing. to make claims that u don't/can't back up makes u a joke (for entertainment purposes only). if u say front is mj, than u must know mj, can u at least prove that u know him. if i'm coming off harsh it's because i've always been a no-nonsense person. i don't do games, beat around the bush, or have time for B.S. that being said, if u have something concrete SPEAK UP if not SHUT UP. yes, u did/do keep things lively around here & keep the brains working. but, if ur intentions are to play games with us & use our caring for mj as a weakness, when it's said and done it won't be our weakness that u will remember. soooo...ball is in ur court and again welcome back.<br /><br />sorry for the rant but my alter ego (THE BITCH) is surfacing. i don't feel like the up & down, going around in circles again. we've been there & done that.
<br />[size=72pt]BAM!!!!![/size]<br /><br />[size=14pt]The end comes SUDDENLY!<br /><br />[size=72pt]BAM!!!!![/size]<br /><br />Finally ... the time that we have all been waiting for!<br /><br />TS = FAKE INFORMER (informer of the fake)<br /><br />And did anyone notice when the S&P 500 closed at 1776—for the first time ever {http://finance.yahoo.com/q?s=^gspc}?? <br /><br />For now, though, I will say that I’m not Front, and I’m not MJ (as I’ve said before); but Front is the real MJ <br /><br /><br />[size=72pt]BAM!!!!![/size]<br /><br />[size=14pt]Let’s do it one more time ...[/size]<br /><br />[size=72pt]BAM!!!!![/size]<br />
<br /><br />Oh well now I get it. TS/_comments gives fake information. End of sentence.<br /><br />Truth comes from within. Not from outside "sources", and especially not from someone who calls himself The Source.<br /><br />Interesting 4.5 year circular journey. Well, it is/was entertaining.
<br />From a quick glance the closest I found.<br /><br />Dec 13, 2013 1,777.98 1,780.92 1,772.45 1,775.32 3,061,070,000 1,775.32<br />Dec 12, 2013 1,781.71 1,782.99 1,772.28 [size=12pt]1,775.50[/size] 3,306,640,000 1,775.50<br /><br />It's not important anyway..<br />
<br /><br /><br />
4-10. Rounding: Down, Nearest Whole, and Up<br /><br />[...] inclusive reckoning is merely a system of rounding up to the next whole number (so anything from 1.1 to 1.9 would be rounded up to 2). [size=12pt]Today, we usually round to the nearest whole number (1.1 to 1.4 rounded to 1; and 1.5 to 1.9 rounded to 2). And if not the nearest whole, we generally round down (1.1 to 1.9 rounded to 1).[/size]<br /><br />Rounding up was a common system in Bible days, and MJ is very familiar with the Bible. In fact, this system is most well known in reference to the death, burial, and resurrection of Christ!<br /><br />1 Corinthians 15:3,4, “Christ died for our sins according to the scriptures; And that he was buried, and that he rose again the third day according to the scriptures:” (see also Matthew 20:19; Mark 9:31; 10:34; Luke 18:33; 24:7,6; etc).<br /><br />Jesus died and was buried on Friday (day #1), rested on the Sabbath (day #2), and rose on Sunday (day #3). There are many other Biblical examples of inclusive reckoning (read carefully Luke 13:32; Acts 10:3,9,23,24,30); but I will not take up anymore space here.<br />
It IS important @Thriller4ever because that is where people are not playing by the same game. One day this rule applies, the other day some other rule because else the theory is wrong. TS meant BAM on 5/5 (MJ) and TS meant S&P500 closing on 5/5. God may strike me dead this very moment if that is not what he meant. So TS was wrong, meaning there is nothing left to look into regarding this post. That doesn't make me a bitch, it makes me a realist. What curls says is important too. It shouldn't matter whether or not there is a bam. If it will never happen (what I would find surprising but who knows), then people should have their own lives to worry about without being obsessed with this. And that is exactly what is happening now with Front and what I don't want to see happening with TS. Front is having his own clan of women there, all expecting big things only to get very disappointed in the end. Some might be fine and pick themselves up, others I have seen are pretty weak and might get damaged for life, or worse. And that is no joke. I rather have an empty forum for a bit because people think I am a bitch than that I would have to live with that shit because I allowed it.
"For we wrestle not against flesh and blood, but against principalities, against powers, against the rulers of the darkness of this world, against spiritual wickedness in high places."
I get what you're saying Souza<br /><br />But when it comes to hoax, viewer discretion is advised. We have long ago been warned that hoax wasn't meant for the fainthearted. And it's the people who end up being responsible for what they've been believing. I learned in these 4+ years not to be addicted to the hoax (which I terribly was) and I've even considered many different theories and scenarios to keep me grounded. TS's post was, to be brief, very unprofessional. The declaration of Front being MJ was very random, out of the blue. I'm aware many users in this forum must have been overwhelmed to hear that. But that's all upto them. We choose what to believe and it requires guts to take responsibilities for any damages (may God forbid).<br /><br />But seriously there's nothing we can do about it. I don't think this hoax is anymore about cracking the codes, because, as you said, there's no pattern being followed.
Souza - I don't see anyone here going crazy over Front - are you referring to the other forum? If so, you really can't blame yourself, or consider yourself responsible in some way for 'allowing' it to happen. Whatever, whoever you discourage or ban here, will always pop up somewhere else if they've got something to say or are that keen on having supporters/followers. Don't beat yourself up over this. If you want to ban TS, because you think some of us still think he's worth watching, and you don't, then go ahead and do it, if it'll make you feel better, it's your place after all, though again I don't see anyone here obsessed with him.
bec, I caught the "fake informer" and "Front is the real MJ" thing too.<br /><br />TS and Front seem to have (probably intentionally) contradicted each other. TS says he's an informer of the fake and then in the same post say Front is MJ. Front said on twitter that anyone who may actually know who MJ is online is NOT going to tell. And also said that anyone claiming to be MJ is definitely not MJ. It's gotten to the point where thinking Front is MJ or not doesn't matter as long as you are thinking for yourself. If someone sees something with 2 or more strong evidences that haven't been debunked to support a "theory", then at least it's a solid theory. Is it proof? No. Is it perspective (whatever an opinion might be)? Yes. If you're thinking for yourself then at least TS has done his "job" whatever else he might say true or untrue. And whatever anyone's opinion on Front is... he sure is one of, if not the most, controversial hoax "character".
<br />Souza - I don't see anyone here going crazy over Front - are you referring to the other forum? If so, you really can't blame yourself, or consider yourself responsible in some way for 'allowing' it to happen. Whatever, whoever you discourage or ban here, will always pop up somewhere else if they've got something to say or are that keen on having supporters/followers. Don't beat yourself up over this. If you want to ban TS, because you think some of us still think he's worth watching, and you don't, then go ahead and do it, if it'll make you feel better, it's your place after all, though again I don't see anyone here obsessed with him.<br />
<br /><br />I was not talking about here and I am not going to BAN TS. I am only saying he is wrong, am I not allowed? I just hope he will simply admit it so people will not keep looking into things while there is nothing to look into. Is all I am saying.
"For we wrestle not against flesh and blood, but against principalities, against powers, against the rulers of the darkness of this world, against spiritual wickedness in high places."
<br />One more thing, hasn't it been said constantly 'follow the money' ... what if that was someone wanting us to 'follow the markets' (in which case, gold star to bec!). That 'someone' doesn't have to be MJ, he's a handy hook for anyone to hang their own agenda on.<br />
<br /><br />Did you mean to say that this whole stock market thing might have nothing to do with the hoax or Michael? Because I've been wondering where this financial thing is heading to?<br />
<br /><br />Sorry Thriller, I forgot to reply to this earlier. Yes, I guess that is one of the thoughts that run through my mind. You have something you want people to take notice of, you use a 'celebrity' to 'sell' the idea. In this case, TS has something to say and could be simply linking himself to MJ's name (albeit in a very detailed way) to get attention. I have an idea where it's heading to ... and who The Source is, but I'm keeping quiet about that for now - not in a 'mysterious' way, I just don't want to say!
Well I missed all of this and I'm quite glad I did to be honest. Did anyone see the article about ''Michael Jackson to Make Television History on the BBMAs'' I can't find it on the forum. Sorry about this being off topic.<br /><br />EDIT: I see it's another thread, sorry about that so please ignore my comment about bbmas.
TS/_comments has made no secret of being a fake. He's said it several times. He's said he would support false theories on at least two occasions. Once early on and again during the levels. He said if no Bam by 12/31/12, he's a fake. And he said it again on 5/5. <br /><br />For all we know, the false theory he believes he is supporting is the hoax itself.<br /><br />But I won't lie, I am entertained.
<br />He meant 5/5. He also meant MJ's BAM on 5/5. Maybe he will be back one more time to confirm this and stop this stuff because we are looking into the wrong things now. Or maybe GodhaschosenMJ can confirm. Because I am sick of being blamed for being a TS or Front hater while people try to make something out of a post that was simply a wrong prediction.<br /><br />For the record #1: I like TS, I think he is a nice guy and I do not believe he is harmful, I spoke a lot to him before he went radio silent, I do not think he is MJ, I do not think he is related to MJ and I do not think he has it all right. I do think he has had some very interesting things and I think he has kept the forum alive longer than it normaly would have been because people are simply sick of waiting after almost 5 years. But I do not want people to leave 5 years of investigation for a troll that is wetting panties on a 'humble and friendly forum that trashes someone named S' (who might that be??) because this S is a heartless bitch and lynches TS and bashes Front (VERY humble and friendly...), simply because TS didn't read the forum for a year and a half. So I do not BASH or KICK OUT TS, I simply say he has been wrong on this. If anyone wants to fit this so they can still think Front is real or TS is 'slippery' then fine, but I do not want anyone to say afterwards that I knew and didn't tell anyone. <br /><br />For the record #2: I still believe with all my heart that Front is a big fat nasty TROLL and everyone having wet panties over Front will have red cheeks of shame one day and I have the patience of an angel so go ahead and trash me there, but do not be nice in my face here because I am not an idiot. Like MJ said: THE TRUTH ALWAYS PREVAILS and even if I have to wait another 5 years, it will be worth it.<br />
<br />It was only a hunch, and since you are very clear now, I will detract in thinking you might deep down believe in TS/Front. Just trying to make sense of events, and TS did post on both forums, which have polar views on him. My apologies for abbreviating your name; I meant no disrespect (the "b" name certainly wasn't me).<br /><br />Andrea<br />
bec, I caught the "fake informer" and "Front is the real MJ" thing too.<br /><br />TS and Front seem to have (probably intentionally) contradicted each other. TS says he's an informer of the fake and then in the same post say Front is MJ. Front said on twitter that anyone who may actually know who MJ is online is NOT going to tell. And also said that anyone claiming to be MJ is definitely not MJ. It's gotten to the point where thinking Front is MJ or not doesn't matter as long as you are thinking for yourself. If someone sees something with 2 or more strong evidences that haven't been debunked to support a "theory", then at least it's a solid theory. Is it proof? No. Is it perspective (whatever an opinion might be)? Yes. If you're thinking for yourself then at least TS has done his "job" whatever else he might say true or untrue. And whatever anyone's opinion on Front is... he sure is one of, if not the most, controversial hoax "character".
<br />That's exactly the kind of layered truth all of this has been wrapped in for 5 years, and needs reading between the lines.<br /><br />
<br />TS/_comments has made no secret of being a fake. He's said it several times. He's said he would support false theories on at least two occasions. Once early on and again during the levels. He said if no Bam by 12/31/12, he's a fake. And he said it again on 5/5. <br /><br />For all we know, the false theory he believes he is supporting is the hoax itself.<br /><br />But I won't lie, I am entertained.<br />
<br /><br />you are absolutely right, he did say if no mj by the end of 12/12 he's a fake. i guess the person i'm angry with is myself, for thinking he knew what he was talking about. now my question is why is he back here since he's proven himself to be a fake? i guess entertainment purposes only. in that case i agree with the person that said why waste your time?
<br />TS/_comments has made no secret of being a fake. He's said it several times. He's said he would support false theories on at least two occasions. Once early on and again during the levels. He said if no Bam by 12/31/12, he's a fake. And he said it again on 5/5. <br /><br />For all we know, the false theory he believes he is supporting is the hoax itself.<br /><br />But I won't lie, I am entertained.<br />
<br /><br />you are absolutely right, he did say if no mj by the end of 12/12 he's a fake. i guess the person i'm angry with is myself, for thinking he knew what he was talking about. now my question is why is he back here since he's proven himself to be a fake? i guess entertainment purposes only. in that case i agree with the person that said why waste your time?<br />
<br /><br />TS said he is a fake informer, and he also said that Front is real MJ. So TS is probably back to say Front is fake by proving himself fake, again (which we already knew)
<br />... i guess entertainment purposes only. in that case i agree with the person that said why waste your time?<br />
<br /><br />Nothing wrong with entertainment! (As long as one treats it as such and doesn't take it too seriously) But I agree, if it's not your thing then don't spend/waste your time on it.
<br />TS/_comments has made no secret of being a fake. He's said it several times. He's said he would support false theories on at least two occasions. Once early on and again during the levels. He said if no Bam by 12/31/12, he's a fake. And he said it again on 5/5. <br /><br />[size=12pt]For all we know, the false theory he believes he is supporting is the hoax itself.[/size]<br /><br />But I won't lie, I am entertained.<br />
<br /><br />Agree. Here again, the possible mixture of serious hoax and ARG hoax. In ARGs, the "characters" and puppetmaster(s) don't necessarily tell the truth, but provide a mix of sometimes truth and sometimes false, leading the players farther down the "rabbit hole" (and 5 years is a loooong time). That's my understanding of some of the components of an ARG, anyway. Maybe someone else knows more, and please correct me if I'm wrong.
Did you think about the possibility that TS might be a character put in here just to mislead us? He might be saying truths, half truths and falsehoods, now we have to figure out which ones are the truths and which ones are the falsehoods. I still keep on saying TS is a fake informer (informer of the fake).<br /><br />PS: I don't usually wet my panties with Front, but if I do, it's my own business and no one else.
"For we wrestle not against flesh and blood, but against principalities, against powers, against the rulers of the darkness of this world, against spiritual wickedness in high places."
It would actually be funny If TS the fake informer saying he is not MJ and Front is MJ means he is actually MJ and front is not. Please do not take this and run with it,I am just having fun with the situation.
It would actually be funny If TS the fake informer saying he is not MJ and Front is MJ means he is actually MJ and front is not. Please do not take this and run with it,I am just having fun with the situation.
<br /><br />well that's what I partially said here, I consider the situation to be possible, i personally think so.<br /><br /><br />
TS said he is a fake informer, and he also said that Front is real MJ. So TS is probably back to say Front is fake by proving himself fake, again (which we already knew)
Darn you TS/_comments, it's been over a year since I daydreamed about the hoax while I'm supposed to be working. I blame you for my relapse. Even though you're a fake informer, your posts are interesting. I like to try to prove you are wrong. I think I did prove you wrong in the DWD theory, but you didn't concede the debate. Unless your disappearance from the forum for a year and a half should be considered an admittance of defeat on level 7; one could interpret it as such, because that level was not finished in accordance with your own parameters. I won that debate. You struck a couple of my points legitimately, but if memory serves, you never answered others and your supportive "evidence" was unsubstantiated. You didn't back up your argument. You also didn't come back to answer challenges to your explanation. You may or may not have read past your last log in date, but your DWD theory was not universally accepted or supported on the forum. There were many that found fault with your version of truth. So we know you have been fake for a long time, but it's still fun to see you redirecting and posting with promise of updates n such. You made the ARG as far as I'm concerned so, thank you!<br />
Comments
"For we wrestle not against flesh and blood, but against principalities, against powers, against the rulers of the darkness of this world, against spiritual wickedness in high places.""For we wrestle not against flesh and blood, but against principalities, against powers, against the rulers of the darkness of this world, against spiritual wickedness in high places.""For we wrestle not against flesh and blood, but against principalities, against powers, against the rulers of the darkness of this world, against spiritual wickedness in high places."