Madrid, April 11 - A 6.2 magnitude earthquake occurred to southern Spain, 24 km South-East of the Andalusian city of Granada, indicated the geological survey of (USGS).
The seismic movement occurred at 08 H 00 local (2208 Sunday GMT) 616 km depth near Sierra Nevada, pointed out the USGS
This will inform the government news agency.
I think that difficult times lie ahead somekindofsign <!-- s:shock: -->:shock:<!-- s:shock: -->
There is something a bit strange to this story. Firstly I thought why would CNN report a story and not get the full facts, like the depth, before publishing and causing people to think it was far more serious than it actually was. But looking on the internet CNN seem to have a bit of an interest in earhtquakes. During the Haiti earthquake according to the Guardian, CNN had more coverage than any other news agency with seven reporters on the ground as well as ireports. Seems a bit much when you think the likes of the BBC had one reporter. Also on one of the articles CNN have regarding the spanish earthquake someone has mentioned that they had previously commented on the possiblity of tweets being sent out from someone at the epicentre and that could be sent out to those in the surrounding area that an earthquake was going to reach them soon. CNN apparently jumped straight on it and started moderating the comment. This could be coincidental but what are CNN up to?
There is something a bit strange to this story. Firstly I thought why would CNN report a story and not get the full facts, like the depth, before publishing and causing people to think it was far more serious than it actually was. But looking on the internet CNN seem to have a bit of an interest in earhtquakes. During the Haiti earthquake according to the Guardian, CNN had more coverage than any other news agency with seven reporters on the ground as well as ireports. Seems a bit much when you think the likes of the BBC had one reporter. Also on one of the articles CNN have regarding the spanish earthquake someone has mentioned that they had previously commented on the possiblity of tweets being sent out from someone at the epicentre and that could be sent out to those in the surrounding area that an earthquake was going to reach them soon. CNN apparently jumped straight on it and started moderating the comment. This could be coincidental but what are CNN up to?
so you think CNN knew something we don't ?
If so, where did CNN have the informations ? <!-- s:roll: -->:roll:<!-- s:roll: --> <!-- s:? -->:?<!-- s:? -->
There is something a bit strange to this story. Firstly I thought why would CNN report a story and not get the full facts, like the depth, before publishing and causing people to think it was far more serious than it actually was. But looking on the internet CNN seem to have a bit of an interest in earhtquakes. During the Haiti earthquake according to the Guardian, CNN had more coverage than any other news agency with seven reporters on the ground as well as ireports. Seems a bit much when you think the likes of the BBC had one reporter. Also on one of the articles CNN have regarding the spanish earthquake someone has mentioned that they had previously commented on the possiblity of tweets being sent out from someone at the epicentre and that could be sent out to those in the surrounding area that an earthquake was going to reach them soon. CNN apparently jumped straight on it and started moderating the comment. This could be coincidental but what are CNN up to?
so you think CNN knew something we don't ?
If so, where did CNN have the informations ? <!-- s:roll: -->:roll:<!-- s:roll: --> <!-- s:? -->:?<!-- s:? -->
I know some people think that some of these events aren't natural and are being driven by something else so I was going with that thought in mind that maybe CNN would know something. Personally I think its either a cheap shot to increase traffic to their site or poor journalism. However I'm still curious as to why their heavily moderated someone's theory that its possible to tip someone off about an earthquake. As for where they would get their info from I don't know buts its not the USGS people.
Last Saturday Badkolo had a long talk to a 55 years old man who works for CNN. He talked to him about TMZ breaking the news about Mike's 'death', and this man told Badkolo that CNN has to have 2 sources and one confirmation in order to make claims. That's the reason TMZ beat them, because CNN didn't meet these requirements until minutes after TMZ broke the news.
I'd like to know what CNN's sources and confirmation were in regards to this earthquake...
Last Saturday Badkolo had a long talk to a 55 years old man who works for CNN. He talked to him about TMZ breaking the news about Mike's 'death', and this man told Badkolo that CNN has to have 2 sources and one confirmation in order to make claims. That's the reason TMZ beat them, because CNN didn't meet these requirements until minutes after TMZ broke the news.
I'd like to know what CNN's sources and confirmation were in regards to this earthquake...
There is something a bit strange to this story. Firstly I thought why would CNN report a story and not get the full facts, like the depth, before publishing and causing people to think it was far more serious than it actually was. But looking on the internet CNN seem to have a bit of an interest in earhtquakes. During the Haiti earthquake according to the Guardian, CNN had more coverage than any other news agency with seven reporters on the ground as well as ireports. Seems a bit much when you think the likes of the BBC had one reporter. Also on one of the articles CNN have regarding the spanish earthquake someone has mentioned that they had previously commented on the possiblity of tweets being sent out from someone at the epicentre and that could be sent out to those in the surrounding area that an earthquake was going to reach them soon. CNN apparently jumped straight on it and started moderating the comment. This could be coincidental but what are CNN up to?
so you think CNN knew something we don't ?
If so, where did CNN have the informations ? <!-- s:roll: -->:roll:<!-- s:roll: --> <!-- s:? -->:?<!-- s:? -->
Maybe because Bilderberg owns CNN Spain, and Bilderberg is part of the lluminati ... just a thought <!-- s:( -->:(<!-- s:( -->
There is something a bit strange to this story. Firstly I thought why would CNN report a story and not get the full facts, like the depth, before publishing and causing people to think it was far more serious than it actually was. But looking on the internet CNN seem to have a bit of an interest in earhtquakes. During the Haiti earthquake according to the Guardian, CNN had more coverage than any other news agency with seven reporters on the ground as well as ireports. Seems a bit much when you think the likes of the BBC had one reporter. Also on one of the articles CNN have regarding the spanish earthquake someone has mentioned that they had previously commented on the possiblity of tweets being sent out from someone at the epicentre and that could be sent out to those in the surrounding area that an earthquake was going to reach them soon. CNN apparently jumped straight on it and started moderating the comment. This could be coincidental but what are CNN up to?
so you think CNN knew something we don't ?
If so, where did CNN have the informations ? <!-- s:roll: -->:roll:<!-- s:roll: --> <!-- s:? -->:?<!-- s:? -->
Maybe because Bilderberg owns CNN Spain, and Bilderberg is part of the lluminati ... just a thought <!-- s:( -->:(<!-- s:( -->
CNN Spain is owned by PRISA Group (El Pais, Digital +, Santillana...), owned by Polanco Family, involved in Bilderberg since 70´s.
Bu this group were the last one to report about it.
Today, in Spain, it hasn´t even been metioned on TV news, and it´s out of the newspapers front pages.
Comments
The seismic movement occurred at 08 H 00 local (2208 Sunday GMT) 616 km depth near Sierra Nevada, pointed out the USGS
This will inform the government news agency.
I think that difficult times lie ahead somekindofsign <!-- s:shock: -->:shock:<!-- s:shock: -->
<!-- m -->http://www.cnn.com/2010/WORLD/europe/04 ... tml?hpt=T2<!-- m -->
Peace/Love/Hoax/Michael
LovetheGlove (KL)
USGS says it was 4,9. Local reports, 4,8.
so you think CNN knew something we don't ?
If so, where did CNN have the informations ? <!-- s:roll: -->:roll:<!-- s:roll: --> <!-- s:? -->:?<!-- s:? -->
I know some people think that some of these events aren't natural and are being driven by something else so I was going with that thought in mind that maybe CNN would know something. Personally I think its either a cheap shot to increase traffic to their site or poor journalism. However I'm still curious as to why their heavily moderated someone's theory that its possible to tip someone off about an earthquake. As for where they would get their info from I don't know buts its not the USGS people.
I'd like to know what CNN's sources and confirmation were in regards to this earthquake...
That's very interesting, thanks for that!
Maybe because Bilderberg owns CNN Spain, and Bilderberg is part of the lluminati ... just a thought <!-- s:( -->:(<!-- s:( -->
CNN Spain is owned by PRISA Group (El Pais, Digital +, Santillana...), owned by Polanco Family, involved in Bilderberg since 70´s.
Bu this group were the last one to report about it.
Today, in Spain, it hasn´t even been metioned on TV news, and it´s out of the newspapers front pages.
http://www.diariosur.es/v/20100412/malaga/seismo-grados-deja-sentir-20100412.html
I remember many years ago another one and It was creepy.
Anyway, no damages apparently <!-- s;) -->;)<!-- s;) -->