I've never seen a brown elephant before only grey. It also looks like a piece of bs... <br /> <br />Souza, the forum is working great today, thanks a million! /bravo/ <br /> <br />I got to watch pretty much everything so far, and really felt like the witnesses were not following any script but their own knowledge. But the questions were about all the legal contract issues signing on Murray, and Michael Amir Williams time-line and security details. Again they were ignoring the "elephant" in the room, other inconsistancies showing it is all a hoax. I believe MJ set up EVERY conceivable situation detail so that their testimony would be as real as possible. MAW's emotion on the 25th seems real with all the little panicy phonecalls.<br /> <br />Just 2 things kinda caught my attention. MAW said everything was normal at midnight when they returned to the house after rehearsal and they carried in a bunch of gifts from fans. But according to LoToya she said fans said MJ didn't chat with fans like normal and there were extra bodygaurds than normal. Someone's lying there.<br /> <br />The other thing is that MAW recorded Murray's call to him while he was at his residence in down town Los Angeles at 12:00 noon or so the next day and Murray had simply said that Michael had had a bad reaction and to come right away. But why would MAW record something so innocent because there's no hint that he would die of that, like he would need it for evidence in court in the future. That seemed off to me.
<br /><br />The other thing is that MAW recorded Murray's call to him while he was at his residence in down town Los Angeles at 12:00 noon or so the next day and Murray had simply said that Michael had had a bad reaction and to come right away. But why would MAW record something so innocent because there's no hint that he would die of that, like he would need it for evidence in court in the future. That seemed off to me.<br />
<br /><br />If I understood correctly, Michael Amir was asked by "detectives" to record this voice mail.
Did anyone tried calling the numbers they showed in court today? <br />I did ;D, but only on one number, the CM's mobile number 702-809-3747 and a very pissed off lady picked up the phone. She scared me :?, so i hang up. I wish i was not that shy and i wish i would be able to ask WHY she is piking up this phone? If CM changed his phone number, then i would ask her how she got it. But i am such a coward :oops. Maybe one of you guys, can call her and talk to her. <br />The trial looks so staged to me, why would they show all these phone numbers on TV? i mean normally they would cover up information like that. Remember the FBI files, because they are real, they were blacking out all the names, which we did not need to know and all the other personal information.
And that recording was supposedly 10th May, just 4 days before the Jackson family get together where Jermaine said MJ was healthy, excited and ripped. Oh really?<br /><br />Actually, yes, I think it may well have been recorded on 10th May and when they all met up a few days later I can imagine MJ probably told them all about this creepy audio he'd just done for the trial!<br /><br />Hell, Jermaine's just told the world in no uncertain terms that Michael pretended to be sick and in a wheelchair to fool the press, he's announced what a manipulator and showman he is - what more does he have to say?<br /><br />(Off topic: I just thought as I wrote that, that maybe Jermaine will be the one to 'announce' the bam, just as he announced the 'death', and we were told he was the only official spokesman for the family - hmmm!)
<br />And i i dare to say that these asshole<br /> ( i am referring to the media )perhaps suspect that MJ is alive but do not dare to say anything<br />
<br /><br />I've wondered this for a long time Paula, we CANNOT be the only ones to know! Perhaps the whole world knows but doesn't say!
<br />I've never seen a brown elephant before only grey. It also looks like a piece of bs... <br /> <br />Souza, the forum is working great today, thanks a million! /bravo/ <br /> <br />I got to watch pretty much everything so far, and really felt like the witnesses were not following any script but their own knowledge. But the questions were about all the legal contract issues signing on Murray, and Michael Amir Williams time-line and security details. Again they were ignoring the "elephant" in the room, other inconsistancies showing it is all a hoax. I believe MJ set up EVERY conceivable situation detail so that their testimony would be as real as possible. MAW's emotion on the 25th seems real with all the little panicy phonecalls.<br /> <br />Just 2 things kinda caught my attention. MAW said everything was normal at midnight when they returned to the house after rehearsal and they carried in a bunch of gifts from fans. But according to LoToya she said fans said MJ didn't chat with fans like normal and there were extra bodygaurds than normal. Someone's lying there.<br /> <br />The other thing is that MAW recorded Murray's call to him while he was at his residence in down town Los Angeles at 12:00 noon or so the next day and Murray had simply said that Michael had had a bad reaction and to come right away. But why would MAW record something so innocent because there's no hint that he would die of that, like he would need it for evidence in court in the future. That seemed off to me.<br />
<br /><br />MAW didn't record that. You see CM called MAW on June 25 at 12:13 pm and left him a voice msg,(he said, "please call me back, thank you")because MAW didn't pick up the phone. It's a very common thing in Iphones. Then MAW called him back and they talked for about 35 seconds. So then he recorded this voice msg on camera to prove to the Police that it WAS actually a msg from his iphone. But the weird thing is that WHY would police ask him to record the VIDEO of this msg, when MAW could simply show the police his phone, without any videos.
<br />Oh wow just now saw the cleaned up version of the pic and there's still no aura!!! :'(<br />
<br /><br /><br />OMG, he MUST be dead then... :?
"For we wrestle not against flesh and blood, but against principalities, against powers, against the rulers of the darkness of this world, against spiritual wickedness in high places."
<br />I've never seen a brown elephant before only grey. It also looks like a piece of bs... <br /> <br />Souza, the forum is working great today, thanks a million! /bravo/ <br /> <br />I got to watch pretty much everything so far, and really felt like the witnesses were not following any script but their own knowledge. But the questions were about all the legal contract issues signing on Murray, and Michael Amir Williams time-line and security details. Again they were ignoring the "elephant" in the room, other inconsistancies showing it is all a hoax. I believe MJ set up EVERY conceivable situation detail so that their testimony would be as real as possible. MAW's emotion on the 25th seems real with all the little panicy phonecalls.<br /> <br />Just 2 things kinda caught my attention. MAW said everything was normal at midnight when they returned to the house after rehearsal and they carried in a bunch of gifts from fans. But according to LoToya she said fans said MJ didn't chat with fans like normal and there were extra bodygaurds than normal. Someone's lying there.<br /> <br />The other thing is that MAW recorded Murray's call to him while he was at his residence in down town Los Angeles at 12:00 noon or so the next day and Murray had simply said that Michael had had a bad reaction and to come right away. But why would MAW record something so innocent because there's no hint that he would die of that, like he would need it for evidence in court in the future. That seemed off to me.<br />
<br /><br />MAW didn't record that. You see CM called MAW on June 25 at 12:13 pm and left him a voice msg,(he said, "please call me back, thank you")because MAW didn't pick up the phone. It's a very common thing in Iphones. Then MAW called him back and they talked for about 35 seconds. [size=10pt]So then he recorded this voice msg on camera to prove to the Police that it WAS actually a msg from his iphone. But the weird thing is that WHY would police ask him to record the VIDEO of this msg, when MAW could simply show the police his phone, without any videos. [/size]
<br /><br />The detective had him record this on a seperate video so that it could be introduced as evidence, also so they did not have to take MAW's personal phone away from him for the extended amount of time before the trial and during.
OMG!Faheem MUHAMMED just stated that Dr.MURRY asked if anyone knew how to perform CPR.How can u be a cardiologist and not know CPR.Most nurses are trained to do CPR. lolol/ u have got to be kidding me.
The trial is getting good. Michael Amir says he did not come up with the lie about the keys with Mohammed and Mohammed says he did come up with the lie about the keys with Amir. Maybe they were confused?!?! lol
<br />How would a trial against Murray be a sting on the media? IF this was a sting on the media all MJ would of had to do is fake his death, do the memorial, funeral, stay gone for a while during his play time with the media, then come back and BAM! Tell the media they got punked. IF the media was the target, after the BAM then everyone would know the media is full of shit and lies to the public but again there is still the trial. What would be the point in doing the trial to expose the media as liars?<br /><br />The media is getting punked for sure but when thinking about a sting operation the targets are much bigger and dirtier than just some talking heads in front of the camera. The justice system with it's shady and corrupt actions are much more important in exposing.
<br /><br />I have to agree with this. This can not be a sting on media. This is so much bigger than this. The media is already punked, no trial was needed. And I do not believe the media is aware of the situation except TMZ and maybe some employees of CNN like Larry King.<br /><br />
on 1317234846:
<br />The jury is a real jury. They really were pooled from the community. The reason I say that is because they filled out an extensive questionare and because of their answers many were let go. IF the jury was in on it the questionare would not even need to be part of the picture.
<br /><br />I have to disagree with this. We do not know IF the jury is in on it or not and we can not know it for now. We were TOLD that they filled out a questionare and again we were TOLD that they chose these jurors among hundreds of people. How do we know it? I'm not saying, they're definitely in on it and know the hoax but I'm saying that we can not know if they're in on it or not. <br /><br />
on 1317234846:
The DA's office isn't a hoaxer so they do not look at the middle name with hoaxy glasses on. They would not have any reason to think that MJ's middle name was different. They do not need to know his middle name to try to prosecute Murray.
<br /><br />I personally believe that there're some key people who know about the hoax in DA. The way the head prosecutor asked the questions and mentioned a couple of words a couple of times made me also think that he knows the hoax.<br /><br /><br />
on 1317151606:
:idea: Prosecution: [the day before his death] 'Michael was excited about the Illusion that was to begin the next day'. Great, just great, that the Prosecution slipped that in.
<br />
on 1317208808:
Ding dong, everyone paying attention? The DA even asked Kenny what that illusion meant, and Kenny answered that MJ would disappear from a bed. I wonder how many people noticed that huge 'coincidence'.
<br /><br />
on 1317234846:
During the DA's opening statements he was telling the jury what Kenny had stated about the Illusion and that they would be hearing about that from Kenny. The DA was just repeating what Kenny had said during the pre-liminary hearings. The DA was saying that after Kenny told MJ about the Illusion starting the next day MJ was excited. The DA was using that as an example to show MJ was in a good mood. This was a strategic move to show MJ was not feeling ill and to give the impression MJ was healthy on the day Kenny told him of the Illusion..
<br /><br />I have to agree with Bec and Souza. The DA asked repeatedly about the illusion and repeated MAGIC ACT again a couple of times. I don't know if we get it this way because we're looking with our hoax eyes but that stood out to me. And why would the prosecutor try to prove that Michael was healthy? Shouldn't they try to prove the opposite? confused/<br /><br />
OMG!Faheem MUHAMMED just stated that Dr.MURRY asked if anyone knew how to perform CPR.How can u be a cardiologist and not know CPR.Most nurses are trained to do CPR. lolol/ u have got to be kidding me.
<br />Did anyone tried calling the numbers they showed in court today? <br />I did ;D, but only on one number, the CM's mobile number 702-809-3747 and a very pissed off lady picked up the phone. She scared me :?, so i hang up. I wish i was not that shy and i wish i would be able to ask WHY she is piking up this phone? If CM changed his phone number, then i would ask her how she got it. But i am such a coward :oops. Maybe one of you guys, can call her and talk to her. <br />The trial looks so staged to me, why would they show all these phone numbers on TV? i mean normally they would cover up information like that. Remember the FBI files, because they are real, they were blacking out all the names, which we did not need to know and all the other personal information.<br />
i was thinking the same thing about the numbers being shown,i can understand the name being shown,but not the number.even on Judge Judy they block this kind of stuff out,and thats a cival court,this is criminal court.only certain eyes can pick these kind of things out,the believers.aren't we so lucky, lolol/
And why would the prosecutor try to prove that Michael was healthy? Shouldn't they try to prove the opposite?
@PureLove-The point is the prosecution is saying that on June 23 and June 24 Michael was healthy, coherant, excited for the Illusion, etc. The DA's point is MJ wouldn't have took his own life because he had alot to look forward to. The DA is trying to prove that Murray is the reason why MJ is dead because he gave him all those drugs. No they wouldn't try to prove the opposite because then they wouldn't even have to prosecute anyone if MJ killed himself.
I think this is a hoax court "with STINGS attached". I think the prosecution knows, I think the judge knows, the defence knows and I think the jury knows. I also think that is why we had the delay between May and now. They questioned the potentials jurors back than and I think they needed the time to screen them, let them sign some papers and make sure they were up to date about this hoax court. The sting part is probably against the media and some of the witnesses, but that we will learn as the trial progresses.
How would a trial against Murray be a sting on the media? IF this was a sting on the media all MJ would of had to do is fake his death, do the memorial, funeral, stay gone for a while during his play time with the media, then come back and BAM! Tell the media they got punked. IF the media was the target, after the BAM then everyone would know the media is full of shit and lies to the public but again there is still the trial. What would be the point in doing the trial to expose the media as liars?<br /><br />The media is getting punked for sure but when thinking about a sting operation the targets are much bigger and dirtier than just some talking heads in front of the camera. The justice system with it's shady and corrupt actions are much more important in exposing. The DA is doing his job and going through the motions but he is not in on it. He is really thinking he has a case.
<br /><br />The trial is needed for the simple reason that the media should have an excuse to investigate. If he only faked his death, and no foul play was involved, there would be nothing to question. The family says he's dead, so that's it. But as soon as it is alleged that he was killed/murdered, the media would have an excuse to investigate the case and see the inconsistencies. But still they don't, not even when an innocent man is on trial. So for a 'sting' against the media, a trial IS needed in my opinion. But as I explained later on, I think the real sting is against certain people/organisations behind the curtain, and that this trial is also partly meant as a distraction, hence why the focus is only on Murray. <br /><br />
on 1317234846:
The defense most likely knows, well at least Murray does. The judge is also someone who is under investigation. The judge is someone who hands down a verdict so considering what TS said about that...
We also know that for years the FBI investigated MJ, and the pedophile claim; but they found nothing against MJ. Could it be that in the process of this investigation, the FBI found evidence of corruption in the LA prosecution and the MJ trial? Could it be that as a result, the FBI in cooperation with MJ decided to make the LA court system the focus of a sting operation? Please remember that the “top priority” of the FBI is “public corruption” in government agencies; and their investigation specifically includes “verdicts handed down in courts” <br />{http://www.fbi.gov/about-us/investigate/corruption}.
The jury is a real jury. They really were pooled from the community. The reason I say that is because they filled out an extensive questionare and because of their answers many were let go. IF the jury was in on it the questionare would not even need to be part of the picture.
<br /><br />The judge is in on it. He is the one setting the oh so 'coincidental' dates. Also, and I said that back in the other thread about sting vs. hoax: MJ was malicious prosecuted by the SB prosecution, not the LA prosecution. There is corruption everywhere, and only targeting this one court doesn't make sense. You might catch a judge and a DA, but you won't expose all the rest of the corrupt bunch. <br /><br />And we do not know if the jury is real. They could be, but they could also have been picked from the first pool like I explained earlier. They had 4 months to screen them and (if necessary) contract them. Like TS says: Kangaroo court, or hoax court, which means the verdict is already known. That means the jury already have orders about their verdict.<br /><br />Also (and I have mentioned this before as well) if the DA was not in on it, and they would suspect him being corrupt, then so far he has shown he's not very focussed to get Murray in jail. He only charged him with one count, while he could have charged him with many more. That doesn't make sense either. And if he was corrupt in the way that he would want to save Murray from jail, even if he were guilty, then why prosecute him at all?<br /><br />
on 1317234846:
on 1317208808:
The first smoking gun for me (also indicating that the prosecution is in on it) was at the start of the DA's opening statement. Michael JOSEPH Jackson died. We all know for a very long time (and thank you Jermaine for confirming that in your book!) that his middle name is JOE. You really can't tell me that the prosecution wouldn't know. They read like we do, they must know his middle name is Joe, so if the sting would have been against them, they would have smelled a rat right at the beginning and I don't see them going through with the case against Murray.
The DA's office isn't a hoaxer so they do not look at the middle name with hoaxy glasses on. They would not have any reason to think that MJ's middle name was different. They do not need to know his middle name to try to prosecute Murray.
<br /><br />If we go by your theory of sting court against DA (as well as others), then it would also be very likely (if he were dirty) that he would search the net all over for dirt on Murray, just like Sneddon did. Just type in 'Michael Jackson death' or 'Conrad Murray Court Case' and this forum will show up immediately. If he were dirty, he would have enough reson to know exactly what is said about the case as well, and I am sure he would have read about his middle name too. He can pull a BC in a second and as soon as he would have the confirmation on his real middle name, he would have smelled a rat. And let's not forget that the middle name is not the only obvious indication that this is a hoax. And this Walgren looks like a smart guy, so I don't buy it, that DA is definitely in on it. <br /><br />
on 1317234846:
on 1317151606:
:idea: Voice recording, my what a deep voice you have Michael, lol. I don't understand how it is admissible for the Prosecutor to state that this recording is "proof of intoxication". There is simply no way that this could be considered proof of intoxication in a court of law. No objection from the Defense on it either.
<br />
on 1317208808:
The fact that Chernoff didn't object and let the DA go on with this, tells me that the plan is to sort of 'remake' the 2005 trial with one huge difference: this time the innocent black man has a lousy lawyer that can't defend his client as he should. Which will make me think that Murray will be found guilty even though the evidence, if properly investigated, will prove the opposite.
<br />The tape recording was not being introduced as evidence so no objection was needed. The tape was played during the DA's opening statements and was a part of their over view of what they were going to present. That was a strategic move on their part to plant a scary slurring image of MJ in the jurys minds.
<br /><br />Oh, but there were other objections during the opening statements. I know they can't come up with evidence or arguments, but it's not like they are free to say whatever they want. And I watched TMZ live this afternoon, and I noticed that Harvey was also surprised that there was no objection to that from the prosecution, and he's a lawyer, so apparently it is very normal to object in opening statements, evidence or not. You can influence a jury with your statement, and that is what Chernoff did. From day one he said: Klein is the guilty one, not Murray, because Klein addicted MJ to Demerol (not propofol). BS! "Objection! Hearsay Your Honer!".<br /><br />
on 1317234846:
on 1317151606:
:idea: Prosecution: [the day before his death] 'Michael was excited about the Illusion that was to begin the next day'. Great, just great, that the Prosecution slipped that in.
<br />
on 1317208808:
Ding dong, everyone paying attention? The DA even asked Kenny what that illusion meant, and Kenny answered that MJ would disappear from a bed. I wonder how many people noticed that huge 'coincidence'.
During the DA's opening statements he was telling the jury what Kenny had stated about the Illusion and that they would be hearing about that from Kenny. The DA was just repeating what Kenny had said during the pre-liminary hearings. The DA was saying that after Kenny told MJ about the Illusion starting the next day MJ was excited. The DA was using that as an example to show MJ was in a good mood. This was a strategic move to show MJ was not feeling ill and to give the impression MJ was healthy on the day Kenny told him of the Illusion..
<br /><br />Kenny is not the only one who said Mike was in good spirits that day. He could have easily said "You will learn from several witnesses during the trial that Michael Jackson was fit and in good spirits the night before he died...". But instead of saying that, he decided the very hoaxy of the illusion. Coincidence? Maybe, but I happen not to believe in them.<br /><br />
on 1317234846:
on 1317151606:
:idea: Murray's email at 11:15am on 6/25/09, 'all press reports regarding Michael Jackson's health are fallacious'. That's an incredible true statement. Blink and you'll miss it type.
<br />
on 1317208808:
Ding dong again!
Murray's email to the Insurer was a response to their questioning MJ's health based on what they were reading in the news. Murray was reasurring the insurance company that MJ is well and the news reports about his health is fallacious. smiley_spider<br />
<br /><br />Don't we all know that? Hahahahaha, he had to be healthy enough to at least not die. If anything, we know THAT for sure.<br /><br />I am actually waiting for TS and his far-fetched murder theories. I agree on too many points with you to really have much satisfaction in challenging your statements, lol. I wanna kick some ass! TS???? Come play when you're done doing what you're doing. lolol/
"For we wrestle not against flesh and blood, but against principalities, against powers, against the rulers of the darkness of this world, against spiritual wickedness in high places."
And why would the prosecutor try to prove that Michael was healthy? Shouldn't they try to prove the opposite?
@PureLove-The point is the prosecution is saying that on June 23 and June 24 Michael was healthy, coherant, excited for the Illusion, etc. The DA's point is MJ wouldn't have took his own life because he had alot to look forward to. The DA is trying to prove that Murray is the reason why MJ is dead because he gave him all those drugs. No they wouldn't try to prove the opposite because then they wouldn't even have to prosecute anyone if MJ killed himself.<br />
<br /><br />Actually according to the defense Michael took his own life ACCIDENTALLY. They or noone said that he was depressed and wanted to kill himself. So I don't get why it is important to prove Michael was happy and wouldn't take his own life. He didn't do it on purpose according to the defense. But the prosecutor is trying to prove that Michael didn't inject prop of fool to himself but Murray did it all. And proving how happy he was proves that an addict would never inject himself propofol?
DAAAAAAAAAMN!!!! Is anyone watching HLN with Raymone Bain?!<br />She's letting them know! <br />first she says Rabbi Schmuley shouldn't even be interviewed because his relationship with Mike ending ugly!<br />then she says the trial is a JOKE and they are wasting tax payers money. Jane Valdez cut her off and said "We'll be right back!!" and Jane's face was like this :shock: <br />ahahahahahahahahHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA<br /> <br />for those losing hope DONT give up just yet.<br /> <br />P.s. I don't recall lmfao
<br />DAAAAAAAAAMN!!!! Is anyone watching HLN with Raymone Bain?!<br />She's letting them know! <br />first she says Rabbi Schmuley shouldn't even be interviewed because his relationship with Mike ending ugly!<br />then she says the trial is a JOKE and they are wasting tax payers money. Jane Valdez cut her off and said "We'll be right back!!" and Jane's face was like this :shock: <br />ahahahahahahahahHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA<br /> <br />for those losing hope DONT give up just yet.<br /> <br />P.s. I don't recall lmfao<br />
Hey Purelove, you remember the MJ FB video 'He's BAD, He's Back' <br />HLN, on Nancy Grace they showed a clip from the NASDAQ countdown<br /> <br /> afraid/ <br />
<br />Hey Purelove, you remember the MJ FB video 'He's BAD, He's Back' <br />HLN, on Nancy Grace they showed a clip from the NASDAQ countdown<br /> <br /> afraid/ <br /> <br />
<br /><br />You gotta be kidding me! So, the countdown has started! lolol/
Also (and I have mentioned this before too) if the DA was not in on it, and they would suspect him being corrupt, then so far he has shown he's not very focussed to get Murray in jail. He only charged him with one count, while he could have charged him on many more. That doesn't make sense either. And if he was corrupt in the way that he would want to save Murray from jail, even if he were guilty, then why prosecute him at all?<br />
<br /><br />@Souza-The DA is prejudice towards MJ and therefore they didn't even try to prosecute Murray at all in the beginning. The DA only took the case because of pressure from the family and they only could charge Murray with Involuntary Manslaughter based on the laws definition. The LAPD let the house be open on the same day of MJ's death. They didn't even bother to try to see if more was going on in the house. They didn't question anyone that day. Some pages back I provided definitions of Homicide and Criminal Homicide specifically Involuntary Manslaughter. I also provided an article where a spokeswoman from the DA's office said they didn't have the case, they weren't charging Murray and reports of that was bogus. That article was from Jan. 2010 fresse/<br /><br />The FBI is involved and IF they think and choose to investigate and take down (with MJ's help) the LA court system then there ya go. It doesn't have to be a vendetta from MJ just because of his trial in Santa Barbara. I already said I would only spend so much time debating on one subject so I think we both presented our arguements well. Let it ride...black 27 /woohoo/
<br />Did anyone tried calling the numbers they showed in court today? <br />I did ;D, but only on one number, the CM's mobile number 702-809-3747 and a very pissed off lady picked up the phone. She scared me :?, so i hang up. I wish i was not that shy and i wish i would be able to ask WHY she is piking up this phone? If CM changed his phone number, then i would ask her how she got it. But i am such a coward :oops. Maybe one of you guys, can call her and talk to her. <br />The trial looks so staged to me, why would they show all these phone numbers on TV? i mean normally they would cover up information like that. Remember the FBI files, because they are real, they were blacking out all the names, which we did not need to know and all the other personal information.<br />
i was thinking the same thing about the numbers being shown,i can understand the name being shown,but not the number.even on Judge Judy they block this kind of stuff out,and thats a cival court,this is criminal court.only certain eyes can pick these kind of things out,the believers.aren't we so lucky, lolol/ <br />
<br /><br />I too find it extremely odd to show those phone numbers.<br /><br /><br />There's been a lot of talk about Back doors and Front doors today at the court, and about who got the KEYS. 8-) I was reminded of one of Front's funny jokes:<br /><br />
[size=12pt]Assistant: I ain't got yo' damn KEYS!<br /><br />Randy: Yes, you do! I saw you go in through the Front door and sneak out the Back door!<br /><br />Assistant: How do you know that?<br /><br />Randy: 'cause I was Watchin'!!![/size]
<br /><br /> geek/ <br /><br />Who got the keys finally? The security.<br /><br />- Something else caught my attention. Ed Chernoff (Murray's lawyer) kept on repeating the word "Detail(s)".... I swear he was really insisting on that word! I was like OMG! because of course I thought about what Front said not so long ago............<br /><br />
[size=12pt]DEtAiLS<br /><br />if you blink, you might miss IT……………. [/size]
Comments
"For we wrestle not against flesh and blood, but against principalities, against powers, against the rulers of the darkness of this world, against spiritual wickedness in high places.""For we wrestle not against flesh and blood, but against principalities, against powers, against the rulers of the darkness of this world, against spiritual wickedness in high places."