The final death certificate ?

Tina K.Tina K. Posts: 1,589
edited January 1970 in News
<!-- s:( -->:(<!-- s:( --> <!-- m -->http://www.newsoftheworld.co.uk/multime ... 81072a.jpg<!-- m -->

Homocide. Was in a danish paper today.
«13456

Comments

  • Doesn't mean it's true.. It's page 2 of 2.
  • DatrootDatroot Posts: 1,314
    Don't believe the tabloids.
  • Don't believe the tabloids.

    Exactly. Where would they have got this from anyway?
    I don''t think the family would have released the DC to the media.
  • SeeSee Posts: 196
    Still says Joshep.... but this is worrying......
  • Tina K.Tina K. Posts: 1,589
    This should be the page 1 :
  • DatrootDatroot Posts: 1,314
    Still says Joshep.... but this is worrying......

    It would be worrying if the Coroner had announced it.
  • Oh dear. <!-- s:o -->:o<!-- s:o -->
    Maybe I should have looked at the pic before I posted.
    I honestly don't know now.
  • One file with two different bar codes !? Should it be the same of both pages !?
  • Tina K.Tina K. Posts: 1,589
    I did not see that, but this is good news ! <!-- s;) -->;)<!-- s;) -->
  • DatrootDatroot Posts: 1,314
    One file with two different bar codes !? Should it be the same of both pages !?

    Well spotted - this must mean its fake!!
  • This concerns me. But I still want to see 1. the coroner's real signature and 2. LaToya's real signature. When they censor them like that it makes me suspicious. How do we know they signed the death certificate when we cannot even see if they signed it? We're just being told they signed it with their handwriting but there is no proof of it. And a paper can be altered in many ways but a coroner or UCLA staff never announced his death at the pressconference. This should have been done months ago.
  • Very Weird, I did Notice at the botton it says 1st Date, 07/07/2009, there's the 3 sevens again...
    7,7 2009 2-9=7, so it is 777. <!-- s:? -->:?<!-- s:? -->

    Also shouldn't news as BIG as this be reported on "News Headlines", i have only found it on SKY under "ENTERTAINMENT NEWS", since when has a murder headline come under entertainment news??
    BBC so far have not reported it, The Sun and News Of The World are known for False News.
  • Homocide? Thought it was named homicide.. <!-- s:lol: -->:lol:<!-- s:lol: -->
  • Tina K.Tina K. Posts: 1,589
    Homocide? Thought it was named homicide.. <!-- s:lol: -->:lol:<!-- s:lol: -->
    <!-- s:) -->:)<!-- s:) --> it is, I was typing very fast, because I was very shaky on my fingers.... lol.
  • IdéaloIdéalo Posts: 104
    I thought they were looking for bands cameras for what happened?
  • wait who is the that dr??? or coroner?? i didnt know they listed one but who is that guy?
  • i looked on ucla 's website for the dr christopher rogers and hes not at that hospital if the coroner i never heard about him have you guys??? <!-- s:? -->:?<!-- s:? --> <!-- s:? -->:?<!-- s:? -->
  • Why does a person need 7 DC.? Again with the number 7, I mean what new information did they get
    in the last two months, that now allows then to issue a new DC, makes absolutely no sense.
    Plus why release the doxtors name and block out the signature. So until I see a signed DC, I will not believe it!!!
  • One file with two different bar codes !? Should it be the same of both pages !?

    Well spotted - this must mean its fake!!

    I disagree. This again is "cart before the horse" thinking. It doesn't prove it's fake, it proves there are different codes.

    I challenge you to be a good investigator.
    You must first prove that the numbers should be the same before you can say that this is a problem. Then if the two should be the same start finding out what could be the reason they are different before you say it is fake.

    Does anyone know how to find out if the numbers should be the same? Where can we get these rules? I thought this was a Census Trac number and I researched it some but it blows my mind a bit.
  • DatrootDatroot Posts: 1,314
    One file with two different bar codes !? Should it be the same of both pages !?

    Well spotted - this must mean its fake!!

    I disagree. This again is "cart before the horse" thinking. It doesn't prove it's fake, it proves there are different codes.

    I challenge you to be a good investigator.
    You must first prove that the numbers should be the same before you can say that this is a problem. Then if the two should be the same start finding out what could be the reason they are different before you say it is fake.

    Does anyone know how to find out if the numbers should be the same? Where can we get these rules? I thought this was a Census Trac number and I researched it some but it blows my mind a bit.

    This was discussed at length in a previous topic and on the old forum. The bar codes should match, that is why I posted what I did.
  • I have searched for Dr Christopher Rodgers in California and in UCLA no such doctor, other than a pain mangement specialist and a nature doctor exist. And I do not believe that they would ever have a pain management doctor sign the death certificate, as pain management doctors are not the type of doctor that would work in the emergency/trauma department in UCLA Med Center. So that doctors name still seems some what fishy to me, plus the DC still remains unsigned.
  • Who's Dean C Logan? Why did the Registrar- Recorder County Clerk sign it instead of a doctor? <!-- s:? -->:?<!-- s:? --> The other DCs that've we've seen online were signed by a doctor with the letters VE under his signature, this one's signed by a Registrar-Recorder County Clerk. <!-- s:? -->:?<!-- s:? --> I'm a little confused... <!-- s:? -->:?<!-- s:? -->
  • I have searched for Dr Christopher Rodgers in California and in UCLA no such doctor, other than a pain mangement specialist and a nature doctor exist. And I do not believe that they would ever have a pain management doctor sign the death certificate, as pain management doctors are not the type of doctor that would work in the emergency/trauma department in UCLA Med Center. So that doctors name still seems some what fishy to me, plus the DC still remains unsigned.
    I agree that a pain management wouldn't sign the DC or work in a emergency/trauma department in a hospital, I would think a doctor who works in the ER would work on someone who's dying. They have the training to handle emergency/life of death situations,I wouldn't think a pain management doctor would. I could be wrong though... <!-- s:? -->:?<!-- s:? -->

    It's strange that you couldn't find Dr Christopher Rodgers in California or at UCLA, he should exist if he signed the DC, shouldn't he? <!-- s:? -->:?<!-- s:? --> What do you mean the DC still remains unsigned? Where should the signature be? <!-- s:? -->:?<!-- s:? -->
  • news of the world is the worst tabloid in uk....

    we have seen this dc before....

    its fake anyway <!-- s:) -->:)<!-- s:) --> <!-- s:) -->:)<!-- s:) -->
  • Why does the second paper says amendment?

    We have two different people certifying here...Cheryl Macwillie 1st page and Christopher Rogers in the amendment page...the first page doesn't have a real signature, just the name in print? Does that still make it valid?

    Edit** I think my questions have been answered...<!-- m -->http://movies.rediff.com/report/2010/ja ... rdered.htm<!-- m -->
Sign In or Register to comment.