All these fans are the fans of Southern California and they want Justice for Michael, because they believe MJ was murdered.......Mj couldn't be everywhere..? Just my opinion.
BTW.. I dont know how to make a screen photo on my mac.. but what about the guy with sunglasses behind Edie JOnes (the guy pointing at 1.31).. looks like MJ too.
Go to the Applications folder -->Utilities, and double-click Grab (once it's open, you can right-click the icon in your Dock, go to Options and check "Keep in Dock").
To take a screen shot, click Capture in the menu and make your selection. You can then save the shot anywhere on your Mac.
Thanks to all who stopped here and checked this case again. <!-- s:) -->:)<!-- s:) -->
I hope we will finally get an answer on the day when everything will be revealed. And I am really curious whether the pale person will be on the list of Mike's appearances or not. I say yes, he did it just to demonstrate that he COULD do it. But I can understand those who show their doubt right here very well. It is really too thin material to prove anything.
After all, I am happy that we actually do not need to solve this matter in order to prove that Michael is alive, this has already been done thanks to TS's great contribution and all the other member's hard work. <!-- s:D -->:D<!-- s:D -->
I am wondering if this woman in the video at 3:46 is the same person that was at Eddie Jones speech sometime back.
Take a look and tell me what you think.
[youtube:3fstdhse]
<!-- s --><!-- s -->
I think you mean this lady:woman, there's is no doubt about it. She looks normal.
But the person that I was speaking of was different, she (or he) caused a high confusion and irritation to me about whether she (or he) is male or female.In Addition to this she/he stood out because he/she was very pale, had no visible eyebrows (like Thriller Zombie) and very dark eye-holes. This was also the reason why I initially came to the idea about her/him being a disguise and no real person.
But an interesting thought of you though, thanks for sharing. <!-- s:) -->:)<!-- s:) -->
Thanks for the look. I was thinking the same as you but thought I would give it a shot anyway. I see what you mean though. I went back and watched the Eddie Jones video again and there's definitely not much similarity. I was watching some videos on youtube and she popped out at me.
Thanks again for your input <!-- s;) -->;)<!-- s;) -->
hi, I am bumping this toppic, because my thoughts do regularly go back to this pale woman
I can't help it, sorry if I may bore some of you
I have just received the book "The making of 'Thriller' - 4 days/1983" and it now brings me back to her.
The similarities in the face structure, but also in the expression are amazing, I think.
What is your opinion, now, with a distant look?
Should I finally let her go and believe the statement of the group justice4MJ that the woman is definately not Michael Jackson? Or is there a possibiliy that the group was also tricked by him?
by nefari » Thu Nov 04, 2010 5:24 am
If a member of justice4mj says it's NOT MJ then that is all the more reason for me to BeLIEve that it IS him. Sorry but that is just the way I feel and especially after the compared photos above to the Thriller make up. I stand firm in my beliefs that there are plants in all of the forums and fan groups trying to pull BeLIEvers away from the truth and point us elsewhere so I just follow my own heart and knowledge.
Thriller MJ is totally who I was reminded of with this lady, so thanks for arranging the pics side-be-side. And yes I agree that there are plants in those large fan groups, and I don't trust every so-called verification. We've been lied to, manipulated, etc. We have learned from MJ and TS to always think for ourselves, and make up our own minds. We know absolutely that Michael loved wearing disguises, so why are some so quick to dismiss the possibilities. But if you think he's dead, then I could understand why.
I've seen a lot of talk lately about people thinking certain people are just MJ in disguise.
I'd really like to believe it, but I just can't. If he is alive and wearing disguises we probably just haven't spotted him yet.
The person pictured in the original post of this thread is not made up of prosthetic make-up.
Even the best make-up artist can't make someone look not rubbery.
It's rubber latex, and no matter how much detail and careful work is put into the application, it will always just look like a skin tight rubber mask.
This is why I rolled my eyes so much when people were saying that DR. Murray was MJ in disguise.
The only one so far that could even possibly be MJ is Dave Dave, and I really dont believe that either.
Though I do believe that Dave Dave knows more than he lets on.
As far as the old man at the memorial and the funeral, again, not prosthetic make-up.
I've seen a lot of talk lately about people thinking certain people are just MJ in disguise.
I'd really like to believe it, but I just can't. If he is alive and wearing disguises we probably just haven't spotted him yet.
The person pictured in the original post of this thread is not made up of prosthetic make-up.
Even the best make-up artist can't make someone look not rubbery.
It's rubber latex, and no matter how much detail and careful work is put into the application, it will always just look like a skin tight rubber mask.
This is why I rolled my eyes so much when people were saying that DR. Murray was MJ in disguise.
The only one so far that could even possibly be MJ is Dave Dave, and I really dont believe that either.
Though I do believe that Dave Dave knows more than he lets on.
As far as the old man at the memorial and the funeral, again, not prosthetic make-up.
Sorry, I do not agree with your arguments:
1.prosthetic makeup is not necessarily being made of rubber latex. It can also be made of silicone, gelatin and other materials
<!-- m -->http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prosthetic_makeup<!-- m -->
2. the pale person I presented on the first page is being filmed from too far away to analyze the material of it's facial skin.
what about that person behind and to the left of this pale person...that person looks weird as hell too <!-- s:o -->:o<!-- s:o -->
seems like it could be someone with vitiligo
About which person are you speaking?
justice4MJ said the pale person was there with another woman.
This could be interesting. Could one of you please share a picture?
I've seen a lot of talk lately about people thinking certain people are just MJ in disguise.
I'd really like to believe it, but I just can't. If he is alive and wearing disguises we probably just haven't spotted him yet.
The person pictured in the original post of this thread is not made up of prosthetic make-up.
Even the best make-up artist can't make someone look not rubbery.
It's rubber latex, and no matter how much detail and careful work is put into the application, it will always just look like a skin tight rubber mask.
This is why I rolled my eyes so much when people were saying that DR. Murray was MJ in disguise.
The only one so far that could even possibly be MJ is Dave Dave, and I really dont believe that either.
Though I do believe that Dave Dave knows more than he lets on.
As far as the old man at the memorial and the funeral, again, not prosthetic make-up.
Sorry, I do not agree with your arguments:
1.prosthetic makeup is not necessarily being made of rubber latex. It can also be made of silicone, gelatin and other materials
<!-- m -->http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prosthetic_makeup<!-- m -->
2. the pale person I presented on the first page is being filmed from too far away to analyze the material of it's facial skin.
Can we not edit posts on this board? If so, I'm sorry, I didnt see an edit option/button.
I swear I typed something out in that last post, but for some reason it didn't show up.
Basically I just said that it doesn't matter the material, it's still usually looks fake. I havent seen a make-up disguise yet that looked real. Yeah, if you're not looking for it you wouldn't notice it, but give it more than a glance and it's obvious.
I'm really not trying to stir the pot, it is ultimately my opinion. But I still say that the original person in question in this thread is definitely not wearing any sort of prosthetic make up. Despite the distance he/she was from the camera, you can tell one way or the other.
EDIT- k, so the edit button shows up on this post but not the last one. odd.
Can we not edit posts on this board? If so, I'm sorry, I didnt see an edit option/button.
I swear I typed something out in that last post, but for some reason it didn't show up.
Basically I just said that it doesn't matter the material, it's still usually looks fake. I havent seen a make-up disguise yet that looked real. Yeah, if you're not looking for it you wouldn't notice it, but give it more than a glance and it's obvious.
I'm really not trying to stir the pot, it is ultimately my opinion. But I still say that the original person in question in this thread is definitely not wearing any sort of prosthetic make up. Despite the distance he/she was from the camera, you can tell one way or the other.
EDIT- k, so the edit button shows up on this post but not the last one. odd.
the edit button only shows up for some minutes after the post, later it disappears to avoid the deletion of posts and the distruction of threads (I was confused first too)
to answer your comment: I think it is left to our subjective opinion whether we find her face looking natural or not. This is nothing to argue about, because we have no further proof. I said I found it odd from the beginning, you said she is one of the people you would suspect the least. That's it.
I don't say that I am right with my assumption, but I consider your argument as much worth as mine.
[youtube:3hsn97fn]
watch 4:32, that lady is right there!, so it is not a disguise!
This is an interesting find. We see two woman of a MJJ fan group leaving the court room and the second one shows similarities to the pale person. I took some screenshots below:
Comments
Go to the Applications folder -->Utilities, and double-click Grab (once it's open, you can right-click the icon in your Dock, go to Options and check "Keep in Dock").
To take a screen shot, click Capture in the menu and make your selection. You can then save the shot anywhere on your Mac.
<!-- s:) -->:)<!-- s:) -->
I hope we will finally get an answer on the day when everything will be revealed. And I am really curious whether the pale person will be on the list of Mike's appearances or not. I say yes, he did it just to demonstrate that he COULD do it. But I can understand those who show their doubt right here very well. It is really too thin material to prove anything.
After all, I am happy that we actually do not need to solve this matter in order to prove that Michael is alive, this has already been done thanks to TS's great contribution and all the other member's hard work. <!-- s:D -->:D<!-- s:D -->
Take a look and tell me what you think.
[youtube:27wd3j1i]
<!-- s
I think you mean this lady:woman, there's is no doubt about it. She looks normal.
But the person that I was speaking of was different, she (or he) caused a high confusion and irritation to me about whether she (or he) is male or female.In Addition to this she/he stood out because he/she was very pale, had no visible eyebrows (like Thriller Zombie) and very dark eye-holes. This was also the reason why I initially came to the idea about her/him being a disguise and no real person.
But an interesting thought of you though, thanks for sharing. <!-- s:) -->:)<!-- s:) -->
Thanks again for your input <!-- s;) -->;)<!-- s;) -->
<!-- s
I'd really like to believe it, but I just can't. If he is alive and wearing disguises we probably just haven't spotted him yet.
The person pictured in the original post of this thread is not made up of prosthetic make-up.
Even the best make-up artist can't make someone look not rubbery.
It's rubber latex, and no matter how much detail and careful work is put into the application, it will always just look like a skin tight rubber mask.
This is why I rolled my eyes so much when people were saying that DR. Murray was MJ in disguise.
The only one so far that could even possibly be MJ is Dave Dave, and I really dont believe that either.
Though I do believe that Dave Dave knows more than he lets on.
As far as the old man at the memorial and the funeral, again, not prosthetic make-up.
seems like it could be someone with vitiligo
Sorry, I do not agree with your arguments:
1.prosthetic makeup is not necessarily being made of rubber latex. It can also be made of silicone, gelatin and other materials
<!-- m -->http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prosthetic_makeup<!-- m -->
2. the pale person I presented on the first page is being filmed from too far away to analyze the material of it's facial skin.
About which person are you speaking?
justice4MJ said the pale person was there with another woman.
This could be interesting. Could one of you please share a picture?
I swear I typed something out in that last post, but for some reason it didn't show up.
Basically I just said that it doesn't matter the material, it's still usually looks fake. I havent seen a make-up disguise yet that looked real. Yeah, if you're not looking for it you wouldn't notice it, but give it more than a glance and it's obvious.
I'm really not trying to stir the pot, it is ultimately my opinion. But I still say that the original person in question in this thread is definitely not wearing any sort of prosthetic make up. Despite the distance he/she was from the camera, you can tell one way or the other.
EDIT- k, so the edit button shows up on this post but not the last one. odd.
Nice!
watch 4:32, that lady is right there!, so it is not a disguise!
the edit button only shows up for some minutes after the post, later it disappears to avoid the deletion of posts and the distruction of threads (I was confused first too)
to answer your comment: I think it is left to our subjective opinion whether we find her face looking natural or not. This is nothing to argue about, because we have no further proof. I said I found it odd from the beginning, you said she is one of the people you would suspect the least. That's it.
I don't say that I am right with my assumption, but I consider your argument as much worth as mine.
This is an interesting find. We see two woman of a MJJ fan group leaving the court room and the second one shows similarities to the pale person. I took some screenshots below: