i was watching a tmz live video a couple months ago heehee and this is Harvey.." Why isn't..." and threw the paper to the side and went on to another question lol...was he reading the question " why isn't Michael Jackson on the RIP list?" haha i thought it was hilarious <!-- s --><!-- s -->
I was just going to say that David Carodine commited suicide and he's on the list....but it was accidental... Weird that DJ AM isn't on the list...hrrm.
Someone should complain that DJ AM is not on it...and see if they just forgot lol and see if they put him up on the list
I wouldn't hound them about it. They may just put him on there to satisfy the curiousity of those asking and then it wouldn't get us anywhere. I think it would be best to wait and see how long it takes for them to put him on there - if ever. That would be more telling...especially since they put Martha Stewart's dog? I mean, come on.../b]
Is it because DJ A.M. maybe wasn't that famous. Yeah I know B.S.!!!!! As I realize other people on the list are not famous either so....... guess not right? <!-- s:oops: -->:oops:<!-- s:oops: -->
Oké I have an interesting question about the RIP-list.
On another forum in the Netherlands I wrote about it and someone mentioned the following:
You only come in that category if the maker of the article has used his 'tags' "r.i.p.".
With Michael that's probably not done and maybe in that system you can't put it in afterwards.
Pff, I hope you understand this, because my english is a bit poor ... <!-- s;) -->;)<!-- s;) -->
Does this make sense to you?
Maybe worth investigating this ... <!-- s:) -->:)<!-- s:) -->
Somebody out there in USA to call TMZ and ask, that would be easiest. You dont even have to mention Michael!
`
I would do it from Germany if someone organizes the tel. number!
Groetjes van een nederlandse uit Duitsland(=greetings of a dutchy living in germany)
Bedankt en hallo! (Thanks and hello!)
Ik was bang dat het niet duidelijk zou zijn voor de engelstaligen en denk dat dit wel het onderzoeken waard is.
(I was afraid that it wouldn't be clear for the english speaking members here and I think this is worth investigating.)
Oké I have an interesting question about the RIP-list.
On another forum in the Netherlands I wrote about it and someone mentioned the following:
You only come in that category if the maker of the article has used his 'tags' "r.i.p.".
With Michael that's probably not done and maybe in that system you can't put it in afterwards.
Pff, I hope you understand this, because my english is a bit poor ... <!-- s;) -->;)<!-- s;) -->
Does this make sense to you?
Maybe worth investigating this ... <!-- s:) -->:)<!-- s:) -->
ah okay, so a person could on be put into the RIP list, when the author uses the RIP-TAG? What a BS! <!-- s:D -->:D<!-- s:D --> think that the people would be able to put him in there....but why, when there's no dead Michael Jackson <!-- s;) -->;)<!-- s;) -->
I haven't noticed if they put "R.I.P." at the bottom of any of his news but they have put that little image of it at the top of some of the news they report about him and he still isn't on there. lol I 100% believe that they left him off because they, or someone like Harvey, knows that Michael isn't really dead.
we will not know it for sure as long as we do not get a tmz confirmation on the procedures of adding someone to this list, without mentioning mj.
My opinion
Guys, I don't think it's a good idea to tweet them or keep emailing them about it. They may end up just putting him on there to shut us up and take him back off when he comes back. If we bug them that much about it, they'll do this and then we lose that little bit of "evidence" as well. I don't think it's a good idea to keep hounding all these places. Just like with Forest Lawn. Some have contacted them and they said that Michael wasn't there, then they keep getting calls and emails to the point that they are saying he is. I think we just need to start leaving these two places alone about those two subjects. Let this play out. We have the evidence that we need from them and IF Michael is truly passed away, they'll eventually add him.
I wouldn't consider a tweet as hounding. E-mailing, maybe. But do as you wish. I have tweeted already so too late for me to turn back now <!-- s;) -->;)<!-- s;) --> Carry on.
I was actually thinking of an anonymous way, without mentioning names, hoping that we finally can stop speculating.
But honestly, being the first to announce his passing (too early) and being proud of it, simply does conflict with not putting him on that list.
And I think I say amen to that, neither do I want to provoke tmz to do something that would stir up everything again.
Things DO reveal and we should be awake of michael`s message being transferred. Since June, there IS a lot going on and we know that.The picture will get clearer while time passes by , this is a big issue that will not be solved overnight and that probably has a very good reason.
But of course, this is only my opinion <!-- s:P -->:P<!-- s:P -->
OH hell! Give us a break TMZ! TOTAL B.s.! BEcause if they can put Martha Stewarts dog on the list? THen ummmm surely they can put our beloved MJ <!-- s:twisted: -->:twisted:<!-- s:twisted: --> Then again, no rush because we know and they know he is not dead? <!-- s:) -->:)<!-- s:) --> Maybe MJ has told them "Dont dare put me on there!"
Comments
I agree. <!-- s:) -->:)<!-- s:) -->
On another forum in the Netherlands I wrote about it and someone mentioned the following:
You only come in that category if the maker of the article has used his 'tags' "r.i.p.".
With Michael that's probably not done and maybe in that system you can't put it in afterwards.
Pff, I hope you understand this, because my english is a bit poor ... <!-- s;) -->;)<!-- s;) -->
Does this make sense to you?
Maybe worth investigating this ... <!-- s:) -->:)<!-- s:) -->
`
I would do it from Germany if someone organizes the tel. number!
your english is not poor!
Groetjes van een nederlandse uit Duitsland(=greetings of a dutchy living in germany)
Bedankt en hallo! (Thanks and hello!)
Ik was bang dat het niet duidelijk zou zijn voor de engelstaligen en denk dat dit wel het onderzoeken waard is.
(I was afraid that it wouldn't be clear for the english speaking members here and I think this is worth investigating.)
ah okay, so a person could on be put into the RIP list, when the author uses the RIP-TAG? What a BS! <!-- s:D -->:D<!-- s:D --> think that the people would be able to put him in there....but why, when there's no dead Michael Jackson <!-- s;) -->;)<!-- s;) -->
My opinion
I already did.
http://twitter.com/tmz_news
When will Michael Jackson be added to the RIP section? 7 months and counting! You broke the story now where's the honor?
But honestly, being the first to announce his passing (too early) and being proud of it, simply does conflict with not putting him on that list.
And I think I say amen to that, neither do I want to provoke tmz to do something that would stir up everything again.
Things DO reveal and we should be awake of michael`s message being transferred. Since June, there IS a lot going on and we know that.The picture will get clearer while time passes by , this is a big issue that will not be solved overnight and that probably has a very good reason.
But of course, this is only my opinion <!-- s:P -->:P<!-- s:P -->