sorry some people have to work still want to answer..
so you don't know Michael
Yes the source is very reliable
No this source isn't on forums, twitter , you tube or anything
This source isnt famous and doesn't want to be famous
Yes we have seen the evidence
No we can't tell you what evidence because we won't have a source then anymore
Yes you will scratch yourself behind your ears when the truth will prevail
And yes i still don't understand what wearing or not wearing a wig has to do with this hoax
We're NOT going there again dvdg1, that's a closed discussion, period.
like i told you some people have a job and i still wanted to answer Mo
<!-- s:D -->:D<!-- s:D --> JUST SIMMER DOWN AND JOIN THE PARTY IN THE PADDED CELL <!-- s --><!-- s --> <!-- s --><!-- s -->
I have to tell you the same as Hesoutthere
But there is one thing that I don't understand.....some people keep telling me over and over again that you know Michael Souza & Mo so why this forum
You have to know the truth then allready?
I have no idea who told you that, but what I do know is that Mike seems to have a lot of 'close friends' since he died. Don't believe anything you are told. There are a lot of people that are trying to get people off the hoax train because they don't want the truth out there. People that were close to him on certain moments in his life might be able to give you something that makes you think they know about the hoax and his reasons, but they are not all on his side or in the know about this hoax. Stopping the hoax train is stopping the truth and that is absolutely not helping Mike. Look at what he had to endure his whole life. I think he can handle this for the good cause since we are doing it as respectful as possible.
Tell me one thing: where were all these close friends when he needed them the most? All those friends on Twitter, facebook, in chatrooms and yet almost no one supported him during the trial. So do you really think they would know what he is doing now? How many people do you think he can trust with his life?
I have spoken to a lot of 'friends' of Mike, and they all had a different story, yet they all seemed to be reliable at first glance and could have made us fall for it if we didn't ask a little futher.
Mike's real friends would want the truth out there and not go into hiding and let the tabloids go on with their crap.
You can do whatever you want, but don't use our forum as your platform, use your own website.
I don't know if the friends you're talking about have showen you any evidence???
I have seen and heard the evidence and this paticular friend have been there for him in a long time.. Again Mike is a very private person and not all he is close to have been out in the open... If you look at the friends they are famous... Mike have friends that aren't famous... These friends are really close to him and means a lot to him... They know how to respect his privacy..
So after i've seen the evidence i know this person is very legit... Yes i trust this person and yes this person is close to him....
HI! WHY DON´T YOU SHOW US THIS EVIDENCE AND STOP TO BE SO CRYPTIC... I WANT TO KNOW THE TRUTH! AND WHY, IF YOU KNOW AND BELIEVE WHAT THIS LEGIT PERSON TOLD YOU, ARE YOU HERE? ON A HOAX FORUM? <!-- s:roll: -->:roll:<!-- s:roll: -->
I have to tell you the same as Hesoutthere
But there is one thing that I don't understand.....some people keep telling me over and over again that you know Michael Souza & Mo so why this forum
You have to know the truth then allready?
I have no idea who told you that, but what I do know is that Mike seems to have a lot of 'close friends' since he died. Don't believe anything you are told. There are a lot of people that are trying to get people off the hoax train because they don't want the truth out there. People that were close to him on certain moments in his life might be able to give you something that makes you think they know about the hoax and his reasons, but they are not all on his side or in the know about this hoax. Stopping the hoax train is stopping the truth and that is absolutely not helping Mike. Look at what he had to endure his whole life. I think he can handle this for the good cause since we are doing it as respectful as possible.
Tell me one thing: where were all these close friends when he needed them the most? All those friends on Twitter, facebook, in chatrooms and yet almost no one supported him during the trial. So do you really think they would know what he is doing now? How many people do you think he can trust with his life?
I have spoken to a lot of 'friends' of Mike, and they all had a different story, yet they all seemed to be reliable at first glance and could have made us fall for it if we didn't ask a little futher.
Mike's real friends would want the truth out there and not go into hiding and let the tabloids go on with their crap.
You can do whatever you want, but don't use our forum as your platform, use your own website.
I don't know if the friends you're talking about have showen you any evidence???
I have seen and heard the evidence and this paticular friend have been there for him in a long time.. Again Mike is a very private person and not all he is close to have been out in the open... If you look at the friends they are famous... Mike have friends that aren't famous... These friends are really close to him and means a lot to him... They know how to respect his privacy..
So after i've seen the evidence i know this person is very legit... Yes i trust this person and yes this person is close to him....
HI! WHY DON´T YOU SHOW US THIS EVIDENCE AND STOP TO BE SO CRYPTIC... I WANT TO KNOW THE TRUTH! AND WHY, IF YOU KNOW AND BELIEVE WHAT THIS LEGIT PERSON TOLD YOU, ARE YOU HERE? ON A HOAX FORUM? <!-- s:roll: -->:roll:<!-- s:roll: -->
please read what we are telling you then you woulden't ask a question like that <!-- s;) -->;)<!-- s;) -->
I have to tell you the same as Hesoutthere
But there is one thing that I don't understand.....some people keep telling me over and over again that you know Michael Souza & Mo so why this forum
You have to know the truth then allready?
I have no idea who told you that, but what I do know is that Mike seems to have a lot of 'close friends' since he died. Don't believe anything you are told. There are a lot of people that are trying to get people off the hoax train because they don't want the truth out there. People that were close to him on certain moments in his life might be able to give you something that makes you think they know about the hoax and his reasons, but they are not all on his side or in the know about this hoax. Stopping the hoax train is stopping the truth and that is absolutely not helping Mike. Look at what he had to endure his whole life. I think he can handle this for the good cause since we are doing it as respectful as possible.
Tell me one thing: where were all these close friends when he needed them the most? All those friends on Twitter, facebook, in chatrooms and yet almost no one supported him during the trial. So do you really think they would know what he is doing now? How many people do you think he can trust with his life?
I have spoken to a lot of 'friends' of Mike, and they all had a different story, yet they all seemed to be reliable at first glance and could have made us fall for it if we didn't ask a little futher.
Mike's real friends would want the truth out there and not go into hiding and let the tabloids go on with their crap.
You can do whatever you want, but don't use our forum as your platform, use your own website.
I don't know if the friends you're talking about have showen you any evidence???
I have seen and heard the evidence and this paticular friend have been there for him in a long time.. Again Mike is a very private person and not all he is close to have been out in the open... If you look at the friends they are famous... Mike have friends that aren't famous... These friends are really close to him and means a lot to him... They know how to respect his privacy..
So after i've seen the evidence i know this person is very legit... Yes i trust this person and yes this person is close to him....
HI! WHY DON´T YOU SHOW US THIS EVIDENCE AND STOP TO BE SO CRYPTIC... I WANT TO KNOW THE TRUTH! AND WHY, IF YOU KNOW AND BELIEVE WHAT THIS LEGIT PERSON TOLD YOU, ARE YOU HERE? ON A HOAX FORUM? <!-- s:roll: -->:roll:<!-- s:roll: -->
Yes Stop Beating around the bush and spit the Bricks already......Dont say you have Proof, if your not going to back it up with evidence!!! it makes your claims totally invalid.... so dvdg1, hesoutthere start showing some "proof"
Very true awesome1 if anyone has evidence that the show, no one has to believe otherwise because someone says one thing and everything is in words and shows no evidence <!-- s:geek: -->:geek:<!-- s:geek: -->
so in order to make you happy we have to show you proof and loose our source
and the admins over here are running around in circles and keep you waiting and waiting for there proof (look at the SUN article) and thats okay <!-- s:shock: -->:shock:<!-- s:shock: -->
<!-- s --><!-- s --> you know what i'm shocked
OK hesoutthere or dvdg1, whoever you are, although I suspect you are the same person.
I have just read your blog. You seem to be on a mission to cause trouble.
"My mission isn’t over yet. I will still be there to defend Michael and help him speak up for himself when people are ignorant like they are on the hoax forums.."
Not a very good idea believe me. We've been here a long time and have put up with other people claiming to know the truth but who are not not willing to share so here is my suggestion, and I don't really care if you think me abrupt - either share or shut up!! You accuse US of being ignorant about Michael and his family yet you demonstrate this behaviour yourself on your blog. You don't know us.
As others have already told you, this is an INVESTIGATION. We look into things in order to try to find answers. The simple fact of the matter is, if you don't like it, don't come here. We don't need to be preached. Every member on here made the decision to join this forum of their own free will. We are not in a cult and were certainly not dragged here kicking and screaming. It's called free will.
And you don't need to preach about grief either:
"When someone close to you dies, it is devastating and you grieve in a certain way that fits you. I feel tempted to say that the hoax-grief is some kind of mass hysteria, where people inflicts others with their mourning and grief, and this all escalate into something of huge dimensions.
None of them will get out on the other side of this grief, as long as thousands of others keeps it alive."
I find you patronising, insulting and just downright rude.
Mo, Souza and other members, I apologise if I have stepped out of line with this response, especially as it is not related to the OP's topic but I am just so very angry right now.
Hum just to tell about my feelings about this : I never read the autopsy report. Just because I knew Michael had things to hide. Burn skin, scares, or whatever. If he used wig, or make up, or clothes to hide is body, that was his choice to deal with his own image. And what has not been showed during his life, shouldn't be told after his life.
I don't need to know about those stuffs... If i met Michael and i happened to see this, it would be ok, but it's not happening, and I don't want to look an autopsy repor to find out about how he really looked. I completely accept the image he wanted to give, whatever he could look like in private life. It's important to keep it like this, because that's the way he choosed it.
I prefer looking for clues in other part of his life than his physical appearance. Music, poems, relationship, funeral, this is it creation...but if the solution is in examining his intimacy, I prefer forget about it and believe what my heart feels.
I have to tell you the same as Hesoutthere
But there is one thing that I don't understand.....some people keep telling me over and over again that you know Michael Souza & Mo so why this forum
You have to know the truth then allready?
I have no idea who told you that, but what I do know is that Mike seems to have a lot of 'close friends' since he died. Don't believe anything you are told. There are a lot of people that are trying to get people off the hoax train because they don't want the truth out there. People that were close to him on certain moments in his life might be able to give you something that makes you think they know about the hoax and his reasons, but they are not all on his side or in the know about this hoax. Stopping the hoax train is stopping the truth and that is absolutely not helping Mike. Look at what he had to endure his whole life. I think he can handle this for the good cause since we are doing it as respectful as possible.
Tell me one thing: where were all these close friends when he needed them the most? All those friends on Twitter, facebook, in chatrooms and yet almost no one supported him during the trial. So do you really think they would know what he is doing now? How many people do you think he can trust with his life?
I have spoken to a lot of 'friends' of Mike, and they all had a different story, yet they all seemed to be reliable at first glance and could have made us fall for it if we didn't ask a little futher.
Mike's real friends would want the truth out there and not go into hiding and let the tabloids go on with their crap.
You can do whatever you want, but don't use our forum as your platform, use your own website.
OK hesoutthere or dvdg1, whoever you are, although I suspect you are the same person.
I have just read your blog. You seem to be on a mission to cause trouble.
"My mission isn’t over yet. I will still be there to defend Michael and help him speak up for himself when people are ignorant like they are on the hoax forums.."
Not a very good idea believe me. We've been here a long time and have put up with other people claiming to know the truth but who are not not willing to share so here is my suggestion, and I don't really care if you think me abrupt - either share or shut up!! You accuse US of being ignorant about Michael and his family yet you demonstrate this behaviour yourself on your blog. You don't know us.
As others have already told you, this is an INVESTIGATION. We look into things in order to try to find answers. The simple fact of the matter is, if you don't like it, don't come here. We don't need to be preached. Every member on here made the decision to join this forum of their own free will. We are not in a cult and were certainly not dragged here kicking and screaming. It's called free will.
And you don't need to preach about grief either:
"When someone close to you dies, it is devastating and you grieve in a certain way that fits you. I feel tempted to say that the hoax-grief is some kind of mass hysteria, where people inflicts others with their mourning and grief, and this all escalate into something of huge dimensions.
None of them will get out on the other side of this grief, as long as thousands of others keeps it alive."
I find you patronising, insulting and just downright rude.
Mo, Souza and other members, I apologise if I have stepped out of line with this response, especially as it is not related to the OP's topic but I am just so very angry right now.
congratulations. you're my favorite person of the week. much love.
so in order to make you happy we have to show you proof and loose our source
and the admins over here are running around in circles and keep you waiting and waiting for there proof (look at the SUN article) and thats okay <!-- s:shock: -->:shock:<!-- s:shock: -->
<!-- s --><!-- s --> you know what i'm shocked
so you are saying that your "source" only wants you and your "friend" to know what the proof is? why, out of thousends of people, did this person say "hey you there, i will give you this proof, but its only for your eyes, dont tell no one".
if someone close to MJ wanted to give people some proof, they wouldn't just give it to ONE person, they would show it to everyone.
you dont even say if the proof is that MJ is alive or that he is dead. you only say you have proof... proof of what??
if you have the proof... of whatever... what do you need the source for? he/she allready gave you want you wanted... do you think they will give you more??? you need more proof??
maybe its time for you to crawl back down under your rock.. and stay there... <!-- s:!: -->:!:<!-- s:!: -->
OK hesoutthere or dvdg1, whoever you are, although I suspect you are the same person.
I have just read your blog. You seem to be on a mission to cause trouble.
"My mission isn’t over yet. I will still be there to defend Michael and help him speak up for himself when people are ignorant like they are on the hoax forums.."
Not a very good idea believe me. We've been here a long time and have put up with other people claiming to know the truth but who are not not willing to share so here is my suggestion, and I don't really care if you think me abrupt - either share or shut up!! You accuse US of being ignorant about Michael and his family yet you demonstrate this behaviour yourself on your blog. You don't know us.
As others have already told you, this is an INVESTIGATION. We look into things in order to try to find answers. The simple fact of the matter is, if you don't like it, don't come here. We don't need to be preached. Every member on here made the decision to join this forum of their own free will. We are not in a cult and were certainly not dragged here kicking and screaming. It's called free will.
And you don't need to preach about grief either:
"When someone close to you dies, it is devastating and you grieve in a certain way that fits you. I feel tempted to say that the hoax-grief is some kind of mass hysteria, where people inflicts others with their mourning and grief, and this all escalate into something of huge dimensions.
None of them will get out on the other side of this grief, as long as thousands of others keeps it alive."
I find you patronising, insulting and just downright rude.
Mo, Souza and other members, I apologise if I have stepped out of line with this response, especially as it is not related to the OP's topic but I am just so very angry right now.
Hesoutthere,if I remember well,you use to be"knowshesalive"???Why are you so upset with us??What are we doing that is so wrong to you??I'm confused <!-- s:? -->:?<!-- s:? -->
"For we wrestle not against flesh and blood, but against principalities, against powers, against the rulers of the darkness of this world, against spiritual wickedness in high places."
possibility 1: MJ used wigs
Possibility 2: MJ used Japanese stretching hair technique. This possibility is most reliable to me. My hair is very curly and once is stretched looks like a wig at times. When I sweat, starts to curl.
Conclusion: Even if Randy Jackson is bald, I doubt Michael was. Michael was missing hair on the crown of he head but apeared to have hear all over the rest of it.
The bald guy of the autopsy repport can´t be MJ.
I have to tell you the same as Hesoutthere
But there is one thing that I don't understand.....some people keep telling me over and over again that you know Michael Souza & Mo so why this forum
You have to know the truth then allready?
I have no idea who told you that, but what I do know is that Mike seems to have a lot of 'close friends' since he died. Don't believe anything you are told. There are a lot of people that are trying to get people off the hoax train because they don't want the truth out there. People that were close to him on certain moments in his life might be able to give you something that makes you think they know about the hoax and his reasons, but they are not all on his side or in the know about this hoax. Stopping the hoax train is stopping the truth and that is absolutely not helping Mike. Look at what he had to endure his whole life. I think he can handle this for the good cause since we are doing it as respectful as possible.
Tell me one thing: where were all these close friends when he needed them the most? All those friends on Twitter, facebook, in chatrooms and yet almost no one supported him during the trial. So do you really think they would know what he is doing now? How many people do you think he can trust with his life?
I have spoken to a lot of 'friends' of Mike, and they all had a different story, yet they all seemed to be reliable at first glance and could have made us fall for it if we didn't ask a little futher.
Mike's real friends would want the truth out there and not go into hiding and let the tabloids go on with their crap.
You can do whatever you want, but don't use our forum as your platform, use your own website.
I don't know if the friends you're talking about have showen you any evidence???
I have seen and heard the evidence and this paticular friend have been there for him in a long time.. Again Mike is a very private person and not all he is close to have been out in the open... If you look at the friends they are famous... Mike have friends that aren't famous... These friends are really close to him and means a lot to him... They know how to respect his privacy..
So after i've seen the evidence i know this person is very legit... Yes i trust this person and yes this person is close to him....
HI! WHY DON´T YOU SHOW US THIS EVIDENCE AND STOP TO BE SO CRYPTIC... I WANT TO KNOW THE TRUTH! AND WHY, IF YOU KNOW AND BELIEVE WHAT THIS LEGIT PERSON TOLD YOU, ARE YOU HERE? ON A HOAX FORUM? <!-- s:roll: -->:roll:<!-- s:roll: -->
please read what we are telling you then you woulden't ask a question like that <!-- s;) -->;)<!-- s;) -->
If we are taking what it says the autopsy report as true, ... then we must assume that Michael died? <!-- s:geek: -->:geek:<!-- s:geek: -->
At the moment we have been told that he is dead <!-- s;) -->;)<!-- s;) --> that autopsy repport would be the starting "legal" point to id the body as MJ.
Do we know if MJ DNA matched the body?
Gema I respond with something I wrote in another thread:
Do not know what to think, maybe not return .. this reminds me of the change which took place at Michael's house after his "death", they took everything and very important personal items such as combs or brushes that Michael used, maybe changed his bed sheets, pillows, .. may have hair of the person using it, you are right in what you say Hopeless
This brings me to remember something that has been discussed in this forum, the person who died on 6/25/2009 was not Michael. Remember the need to do forensic DNA testing and La Toya took a hair from the "corpse" from Michael so that she took the test.
Why a person with a medical history can not be so large to be recognized with your personal physician?, Whose hair is the assumed volume La Toya, if this is true? <!-- s;) -->;)<!-- s;) -->
Well.. Im well annoyed that this thread was hijacked.
All i want to explore is the possibility that MJs hair as curly is his natural hair. MJs hair as straight is natural.
Hence.. MJ reverted back to his curly hair when he toured. Bad, Dangerous and History he had curly hair. In TII he reverted back to curly when on the stage singing and dancing.
This must be because curly hair was natural hair with a few weaves which stayed on his head when dancing and sweating.
Therefore the AR cannot be true.. it stated that MJ had a wig which lifted off.. a weave would have to be cut off.
Well.. Im well annoyed that this thread was hijacked.
All i want to explore is the possibility that MJs hair as curly is his natural hair. MJs hair as straight is natural.
Hence.. MJ reverted back to his curly hair when he toured. Bad, Dangerous and History he had curly hair. In TII he reverted back to curly when on the stage singing and dancing.
This must be because curly hair was natural hair with a few weaves which stayed on his head when dancing and sweating.
Therefore the AR cannot be true.. it stated that MJ had a wig which lifted off.. a weave would have to be cut off.
hmm, i had to think about this one. i definitely think curly michael is his own hair. i know that sometimes the straight hair can appear to be a wig (and it very well could be), but it also depends on the thickness. i have very thick hair that happens to be curly/wavy, and if i blow dried it straight without a flat iron, i can get that poofiness that could look like wig. unfortunately, i haven't been able to know firsthand how thick michael's hair is (and he'd probably find it really creepy if i went up to him and ran my fingers through his hair). if anyone here has had that opportunity, i'll be pming you (ha ha). my point is, is that i totally agree with you that curly concert hair michael is au natural. and the autopsy is f-a-k-e.
Michael Jackson’s Hair Loss - What Happened to his Bald Spot?
The King of Pop once wore a very different crown and almost had it taken away. It’s hard to believe that Michael Jackson once sported a full afro and everyone’s probably also forgotten that he nearly went bald at 25 after a freak fire accident.
While filming a Pepsi commercial in 1984, pyrotechnics accidentally set Jackson’s hair on fire. He was rushed to hospital and treated for second degree burns to the back of his head which scarred his hair follicles and left him with a major bald patch.
When hair-bearing skin is badly burnt, the hair follicles are destroyed and replaced by scar tissue. The hair loss is permanent and known as cicatricial (or scarring) alopecia.
Jackson was singing his hit “Billie Jean” in a simulated concert scene when the special effects went wrong. Three thousand fans saw a firework display erupt behind the superstar, showering him in sparks and setting light to his hair. Jackson covered his burning hair with his jacket but some audience members thought it was part of the act.
Jackson later underwent 80 minutes of laser surgery to repair his scalp. His surgeon Dr. Steven Hoefflin, famously known as “Doc Hollywood” who Jackson formed quite an attachment to over the years, said he was able to stitch the wound without having to implant or transplant hair from other parts of Jackson’s head.
*Update July 2009 - Since Jackson’s death in June 2009 video footage of the accident has been released showing the superstar’s hair catching alight for more than 5 seconds before his entouage and security surrounded him to put out the flames.*
According to Leonora Doclis, senior trichologist at the Belgravia Centre, while laser surgery can make the scar smaller, it won’t help in generating hair growth from the scar.
“Apparently the laser treatment reduced the scar to palm-size, but that is huge,” Leonora says. “If the follicles are damaged they will not produce hair. It is very unlikely that his hair grew back after this treatment.”
This begs the question then – what happened to Michael Jackson’s bald spot? Interestingly, the same surgeon who treated Jackson’s hair loss is responsible for Donald Trump’s comb over. He performed scalp reduction surgery to reduce the size of the business mogul’s bald spot which he now covers with the rest of his hair.
Leonora says treating cicatricial alopecia is challenging. “The best they can do without wearing a wig is if they can hide the scarred bald patch with their own hair.”
Cicatricial alopecia is a broad term that includes all forms of hair loss concerning inflammation directed at the hair follicle.
“There are several reasons for scarring hair loss. Scalding is just one and there is an autoimmune factor,” Leonora says. In addition to burns and other injuries, cicatricial alopecia can be caused by certain types of infections like granulomas, lupus erythematosus, recurring bacterial or fungal infections, a skin disease called lichen planus, and scalp ringworm.
“Therefore there is no point in transplanting hair from one side of the scalp to another when it can still be subject to an autoimmune attack.”
The progression of cicatricial alopecia as the result of an internal problem is unpredictable but hair loss is irreversible once the follicle is destroyed. Leonora says autoimmune suppressant steroids could be injected but they won’t prevent or treat hair loss.
Minoxidil, a vasodilator, may be helpful to stimulate any small, remaining, unscarred follicles but the effectiveness vastly relies on the strength of the medication required by the individual and the damage done to the hair follicles.
Despite Dr. Hoefflin’s claims that Jackson’s scalp would be completely healed within several months, Leonora has her doubts over the authenticity of Jackson’s hair.
“I think he may be covering certain areas with a hair system (hairpiece),” she says. “Some of it could be natural and he could have hair grafts which are a form of non-surgical hair replacement.”
As for his dramatic transformation from typical afro hair to the sleek style he now brandishes, Leonora says chemical straightening could be responsible, if it is indeed his real hair.
Cicatricial alopecia, whether internally or externally provoked, is a frightening and distressing condition. Diagnosis and treatment is often challenging so a consultation with a hair loss specialist is absolutely essential. Treatment for other forms of hair loss such as male or female pattern (genetic) hair loss, and alopecia can be very successful. For more information contact the Belgravia Centre, the UK’s leading hair loss clinic, on 020 7730 6666 or send an email.
And just so you know…
Back then, hair wasn’t Michael Jackson’s only concern – he’d already had two nose jobs by the time he was 25 and went for his third rhinoplasty shortly after the hair loss incident. From then on his visits with Doc. Hollywood became ever more frequent
Comments
HI! WHY DON´T YOU SHOW US THIS EVIDENCE AND STOP TO BE SO CRYPTIC... I WANT TO KNOW THE TRUTH! AND WHY, IF YOU KNOW AND BELIEVE WHAT THIS LEGIT PERSON TOLD YOU, ARE YOU HERE? ON A HOAX FORUM? <!-- s:roll: -->:roll:<!-- s:roll: -->
Yes Stop Beating around the bush and spit the Bricks already......Dont say you have Proof, if your not going to back it up with evidence!!! it makes your claims totally invalid.... so dvdg1, hesoutthere start showing some "proof"
and the admins over here are running around in circles and keep you waiting and waiting for there proof (look at the SUN article) and thats okay <!-- s:shock: -->:shock:<!-- s:shock: -->
<!-- s
I have just read your blog. You seem to be on a mission to cause trouble.
"My mission isn’t over yet. I will still be there to defend Michael and help him speak up for himself when people are ignorant like they are on the hoax forums.."
Not a very good idea believe me. We've been here a long time and have put up with other people claiming to know the truth but who are not not willing to share so here is my suggestion, and I don't really care if you think me abrupt - either share or shut up!! You accuse US of being ignorant about Michael and his family yet you demonstrate this behaviour yourself on your blog. You don't know us.
As others have already told you, this is an INVESTIGATION. We look into things in order to try to find answers. The simple fact of the matter is, if you don't like it, don't come here. We don't need to be preached. Every member on here made the decision to join this forum of their own free will. We are not in a cult and were certainly not dragged here kicking and screaming. It's called free will.
And you don't need to preach about grief either:
"When someone close to you dies, it is devastating and you grieve in a certain way that fits you. I feel tempted to say that the hoax-grief is some kind of mass hysteria, where people inflicts others with their mourning and grief, and this all escalate into something of huge dimensions.
None of them will get out on the other side of this grief, as long as thousands of others keeps it alive."
I find you patronising, insulting and just downright rude.
Mo, Souza and other members, I apologise if I have stepped out of line with this response, especially as it is not related to the OP's topic but I am just so very angry right now.
I don't need to know about those stuffs... If i met Michael and i happened to see this, it would be ok, but it's not happening, and I don't want to look an autopsy repor to find out about how he really looked. I completely accept the image he wanted to give, whatever he could look like in private life. It's important to keep it like this, because that's the way he choosed it.
I prefer looking for clues in other part of his life than his physical appearance. Music, poems, relationship, funeral, this is it creation...but if the solution is in examining his intimacy, I prefer forget about it and believe what my heart feels.
I´m with you on this one Souza.
congratulations. you're my favorite person of the week. much love.
so you are saying that your "source" only wants you and your "friend" to know what the proof is? why, out of thousends of people, did this person say "hey you there, i will give you this proof, but its only for your eyes, dont tell no one".
if someone close to MJ wanted to give people some proof, they wouldn't just give it to ONE person, they would show it to everyone.
you dont even say if the proof is that MJ is alive or that he is dead. you only say you have proof... proof of what??
if you have the proof... of whatever... what do you need the source for? he/she allready gave you want you wanted... do you think they will give you more??? you need more proof??
maybe its time for you to crawl back down under your rock.. and stay there... <!-- s:!: -->:!:<!-- s:!: -->
I agree with you.
Please, try to make some sense and stop contradicting yourself and being cryptic.
People here cooperates with their info. So far you and your friend just claim to be in possesion of the truth but won´t reaveal it ?
I don´t buy it.
"For we wrestle not against flesh and blood, but against principalities, against powers, against the rulers of the darkness of this world, against spiritual wickedness in high places."possibility 1: MJ used wigs
Possibility 2: MJ used Japanese stretching hair technique. This possibility is most reliable to me. My hair is very curly and once is stretched looks like a wig at times. When I sweat, starts to curl.
Conclusion: Even if Randy Jackson is bald, I doubt Michael was. Michael was missing hair on the crown of he head but apeared to have hear all over the rest of it.
The bald guy of the autopsy repport can´t be MJ.
BYE BYE... <!-- s
At the moment we have been told that he is dead <!-- s;) -->;)<!-- s;) --> that autopsy repport would be the starting "legal" point to id the body as MJ.
Do we know if MJ DNA matched the body?
Do not know what to think, maybe not return .. this reminds me of the change which took place at Michael's house after his "death", they took everything and very important personal items such as combs or brushes that Michael used, maybe changed his bed sheets, pillows, .. may have hair of the person using it, you are right in what you say Hopeless
This brings me to remember something that has been discussed in this forum, the person who died on 6/25/2009 was not Michael. Remember the need to do forensic DNA testing and La Toya took a hair from the "corpse" from Michael so that she took the test.
Why a person with a medical history can not be so large to be recognized with your personal physician?, Whose hair is the assumed volume La Toya, if this is true? <!-- s;) -->;)<!-- s;) -->
All i want to explore is the possibility that MJs hair as curly is his natural hair. MJs hair as straight is natural.
Hence.. MJ reverted back to his curly hair when he toured. Bad, Dangerous and History he had curly hair. In TII he reverted back to curly when on the stage singing and dancing.
This must be because curly hair was natural hair with a few weaves which stayed on his head when dancing and sweating.
Therefore the AR cannot be true.. it stated that MJ had a wig which lifted off.. a weave would have to be cut off.
hmm, i had to think about this one. i definitely think curly michael is his own hair. i know that sometimes the straight hair can appear to be a wig (and it very well could be), but it also depends on the thickness. i have very thick hair that happens to be curly/wavy, and if i blow dried it straight without a flat iron, i can get that poofiness that could look like wig. unfortunately, i haven't been able to know firsthand how thick michael's hair is (and he'd probably find it really creepy if i went up to him and ran my fingers through his hair). if anyone here has had that opportunity, i'll be pming you (ha ha). my point is, is that i totally agree with you that curly concert hair michael is au natural. and the autopsy is f-a-k-e.
If this was a wig, why would he choose a grey wig? I havent got the time now, but will post pics of MJ with grey hair in a while