Question,
If this case is won, and Michael were to return, would it be considered fraud?
I don't think so....What they did to Michael was fraudulent, and especially if there was a conspiracy to Murder for his catalogue..If this is a more serious matter and MJ is in witness protection, then this is how the FBI will fish them out..
That is the one bid thing I don't get why out the catalogue up as collaterall I just don't buy that or did they slip that into contract he didn't see it I don't buy that either
it does seem strange that he would put up the catalog when that is the thing he has been so sure that everyone wanted.
was that the bait or was he in that big of a mess ?
That is the one bid thing I don't get why out the catalogue up as collaterall I just don't buy that or did they slip that into contract he didn't see it I don't buy that either
it does seem strange that he would put up the catalog when that is the thing he has been so sure that everyone wanted.
was that the bait or was he in that big of a mess ?
Bait...because one must die to be the light of the world, to reveal the injustices and conspiracies, to awaken the masses to the truth, to be resurrected and change the world. <!-- s;) -->;)<!-- s;) -->
That is the one bid thing I don't get why out the catalogue up as collaterall I just don't buy that or did they slip that into contract he didn't see it I don't buy that either
it does seem strange that he would put up the catalog when that is the thing he has been so sure that everyone wanted.
was that the bait or was he in that big of a mess ?
Bait...because one must die to be the light of the world, to reveal the injustices and conspiracies, to awaken the masses to the truth, to be resurrected and change the world. <!-- s;) -->;)<!-- s;) -->
how do the might the elvis parallels play into the aspect of the suit of katherine?
That is the one bid thing I don't get why out the catalogue up as collaterall I just don't buy that or did they slip that into contract he didn't see it I don't buy that either
it does seem strange that he would put up the catalog when that is the thing he has been so sure that everyone wanted.
was that the bait or was he in that big of a mess ?
Bait...because one must die to be the light of the world, to reveal the injustices and conspiracies, to awaken the masses to the truth, to be resurrected and change the world. <!-- s;) -->;)<!-- s;) -->
how do the might the elvis parallels play into the aspect of the suit of katherine?
The suit is a fraud, a hoax within a hoax. Elvis is a separate aspect of this entire tale. We have the "Final Shows", the different acts of the play, separate stories that are connected through Michael that bring the entire "picture" to the screens, the big screen, the TV screen and the one within our minds. Elvis is the one who came before, to pave the way, test the waters, sound the trumpet even.
That is the one bid thing I don't get why out the catalogue up as collaterall I just don't buy that or did they slip that into contract he didn't see it I don't buy that either
it does seem strange that he would put up the catalog when that is the thing he has been so sure that everyone wanted.
was that the bait or was he in that big of a mess ?
Bait...because one must die to be the light of the world, to reveal the injustices and conspiracies, to awaken the masses to the truth, to be resurrected and change the world. <!-- s;) -->;)<!-- s;) -->
how do the might the elvis parallels play into the aspect of the suit of katherine?
The suit is a fraud, a hoax within a hoax. Elvis is a separate aspect of this entire tale. We have the "Final Shows", the different acts of the play, separate stories that are connected through Michael that bring the entire "picture" to the screens, the big screen, the TV screen and the one within our minds. Elvis is the one who came before, to pave the way, test the waters, sound the trumpet even.
That is the one bid thing I don't get why out the catalogue up as collaterall I just don't buy that or did they slip that into contract he didn't see it I don't buy that either
it does seem strange that he would put up the catalog when that is the thing he has been so sure that everyone wanted.
was that the bait or was he in that big of a mess ?
Bait...because one must die to be the light of the world, to reveal the injustices and conspiracies, to awaken the masses to the truth, to be resurrected and change the world. <!-- s;) -->;)<!-- s;) -->
how do the might the elvis parallels play into the aspect of the suit of katherine?
The suit is a fraud, a hoax within a hoax. Elvis is a separate aspect of this entire tale. We have the "Final Shows", the different acts of the play, separate stories that are connected through Michael that bring the entire "picture" to the screens, the big screen, the TV screen and the one within our minds. Elvis is the one who came before, to pave the way, test the waters, sound the trumpet even.
so you are comparing elvis to john the baptist?
No, I would have look up John the Baptists' story. I am not really versed on it, except for that he baptized Jesus.
Is there some commonalities that you are aware of, between the two, that you can share or do I go read up on that? <!-- s:D -->:D<!-- s:D -->
WE KNOW IS A HOAX
WHAT IF...
MICHAEL "DIED"
AEG BUY THE STORY OF THE DEAD, MADE MEMORIAL, MADE FUNERAL... ALL AEG ... (FILMED HQ <!-- s;) -->;)<!-- s;) --> )
THEY DO THE MOVIE, THE CD...
WHO IS PROFITING OF THE "DEATH"????
THE KIDS NAME´S ARE WRONG OR ARE THE TRUE NAMES?
PRINCE: MICHAEL JOSEPH JACKSON JR.
PARIS: PARIS-MICHAEL KATHERINE JACKSON
BLANKET: PRINCE MICHAEL JACKSON II
WHY BLANKET THE II IF PRINCE IS NOT CALLED PRINCE?
AND PRINCE IS MICHAEL JOSEPH JACKSON JR FOR US TO BUY THE STORY OF MICHAEL JOSEPH DEAD?
That is the one bid thing I don't get why out the catalogue up as collaterall I just don't buy that or did they slip that into contract he didn't see it I don't buy that either
it does seem strange that he would put up the catalog when that is the thing he has been so sure that everyone wanted.
was that the bait or was he in that big of a mess ?
Bait...because one must die to be the light of the world, to reveal the injustices and conspiracies, to awaken the masses to the truth, to be resurrected and change the world. <!-- s;) -->;)<!-- s;) -->
how do the might the elvis parallels play into the aspect of the suit of katherine?
The suit is a fraud, a hoax within a hoax. Elvis is a separate aspect of this entire tale. We have the "Final Shows", the different acts of the play, separate stories that are connected through Michael that bring the entire "picture" to the screens, the big screen, the TV screen and the one within our minds. Elvis is the one who came before, to pave the way, test the waters, sound the trumpet even.
so you are comparing elvis to john the baptist?
No, I would have look up John the Baptists' story. I am not really versed on it, except for that he baptized Jesus.
Is there some commonalities that you are aware of, between the two, that you can share or do I go read up on that? <!-- s:D -->:D<!-- s:D -->
michael was obviously very much into symbolism.
serenity what will you do if michael never returns? i am sitting here with tears over you.you seem to want to much to find something that is missing .you seem to trust michael so much. won't you take just a little time to consider who michael trusted?
my most favorite part of the wizard of oz <!-- s:o -->:o<!-- s:o --> <!-- s:shock: -->:shock:<!-- s:shock: --> <!-- s:evil: -->:evil:<!-- s:evil: --> <!-- s;) -->;)<!-- s;) --> is when glinda ask dorothy what she has learned and dorothy's answer " if i ever again go looking for my hearts desire i won't look any further than my own back yard. because if it isn't there i never really lost to begin with"
michael has been putting jesus right in front of your eyes for a very long time. can you imagine how distraught he would be to think that you couldn't take your eyes off of him long enough to see.
"just because it's in print doesn't mean it's the gospel"
do you think he would have made this comparison if it didn't mean something to him?
That is the one bid thing I don't get why out the catalogue up as collaterall I just don't buy that or did they slip that into contract he didn't see it I don't buy that either
it does seem strange that he would put up the catalog when that is the thing he has been so sure that everyone wanted.
was that the bait or was he in that big of a mess ?
Bait...because one must die to be the light of the world, to reveal the injustices and conspiracies, to awaken the masses to the truth, to be resurrected and change the world. <!-- s;) -->;)<!-- s;) -->
how do the might the elvis parallels play into the aspect of the suit of katherine?
The suit is a fraud, a hoax within a hoax. Elvis is a separate aspect of this entire tale. We have the "Final Shows", the different acts of the play, separate stories that are connected through Michael that bring the entire "picture" to the screens, the big screen, the TV screen and the one within our minds. Elvis is the one who came before, to pave the way, test the waters, sound the trumpet even.
so you are comparing elvis to john the baptist?
No, I would have look up John the Baptists' story. I am not really versed on it, except for that he baptized Jesus.
Is there some commonalities that you are aware of, between the two, that you can share or do I go read up on that? <!-- s:D -->:D<!-- s:D -->
michael was obviously very much into symbolism.
serenity what will you do if michael never returns? i am sitting here with tears over you.you seem to want to much to find something that is missing .you seem to trust michael so much. won't you take just a little time to consider who michael trusted?
my most favorite part of the wizard of oz <!-- s:o -->:o<!-- s:o --> <!-- s:shock: -->:shock:<!-- s:shock: --> <!-- s:evil: -->:evil:<!-- s:evil: --> <!-- s;) -->;)<!-- s;) --> is when glinda ask dorothy what she has learned and dorothy's answer " if i ever again go looking for my hearts desire i won't look any further than my own back yard. because if it isn't there i never really lost to begin with"
michael has been putting jesus right in front of your eyes for a very long time. can you imagine how distraught he would be to think that you couldn't take your eyes off of him long enough to see.
"just because it's in print doesn't mean it's the gospel"
do you think he would have made this comparison if it didn't mean something to him?
i hope that i have not gotten too preachy on you.
Actually, you misunderstand me. I am not looking for anything. I am trying to share what I already know. I am trying to help others understand what has already been revealed to me in July 2009.
For the truth to be believed it can not be told, it must be investigated and discovered for oneself, through discovery one comes to understand and through understanding one comes to believe.
That is the one bid thing I don't get why out the catalogue up as collaterall I just don't buy that or did they slip that into contract he didn't see it I don't buy that either
it does seem strange that he would put up the catalog when that is the thing he has been so sure that everyone wanted.
was that the bait or was he in that big of a mess ?
Bait...because one must die to be the light of the world, to reveal the injustices and conspiracies, to awaken the masses to the truth, to be resurrected and change the world. <!-- s;) -->;)<!-- s;) -->
how do the might the elvis parallels play into the aspect of the suit of katherine?
The suit is a fraud, a hoax within a hoax. Elvis is a separate aspect of this entire tale. We have the "Final Shows", the different acts of the play, separate stories that are connected through Michael that bring the entire "picture" to the screens, the big screen, the TV screen and the one within our minds. Elvis is the one who came before, to pave the way, test the waters, sound the trumpet even.
so you are comparing elvis to john the baptist?
No, I would have look up John the Baptists' story. I am not really versed on it, except for that he baptized Jesus.
Is there some commonalities that you are aware of, between the two, that you can share or do I go read up on that? <!-- s:D -->:D<!-- s:D -->
michael was obviously very much into symbolism.
serenity what will you do if michael never returns? i am sitting here with tears over you.you seem to want to much to find something that is missing .you seem to trust michael so much. won't you take just a little time to consider who michael trusted?
my most favorite part of the wizard of oz <!-- s:o -->:o<!-- s:o --> <!-- s:shock: -->:shock:<!-- s:shock: --> <!-- s:evil: -->:evil:<!-- s:evil: --> <!-- s;) -->;)<!-- s;) --> is when glinda ask dorothy what she has learned and dorothy's answer " if i ever again go looking for my hearts desire i won't look any further than my own back yard. because if it isn't there i never really lost to begin with"
michael has been putting jesus right in front of your eyes for a very long time. can you imagine how distraught he would be to think that you couldn't take your eyes off of him long enough to see.
"just because it's in print doesn't mean it's the gospel"
do you think he would have made this comparison if it didn't mean something to him?
i hope that i have not gotten too preachy on you.
Actually, you misunderstand me. I am not looking for anything. I am trying to share what I already know. I am trying to help others understand what has already been revealed to me in July 2009.
For the truth to be believed it can not be told, it must be investigated and discovered for oneself, through discovery one comes to understand and through understanding one come to believe.
After reading some of the statement of claim made by the Plaintiffs....to me it does not read like a legal document, it reads more like a story....terrible legal drafting in my opinion and I have been in law for over 30 years.
Also, as far as the signature page goes, people can sign personally and sign on behalf of the Company as well. However, if you actually read the sentence above the three signatures, it seems it was an agreement to negotiate a definitive agreement. What was written in the definitive agreement? Was this a copy and paste job?? seems rather odd that only that information is on the last page. It could be pasted onto another agreement. That is why sometimes lawyers number their pages in case of the signature pages being the only information on that page.
To me it does not read like a legal document... it reads more like a story or someone trying to get the proper facts out to the reader.
Shelby, with your legal background thanks for your take on the document. I agree, it didn't read like a legal document and the reason I say that is because I could understand it! It's like laying the story out for the average (non legal) person. Watching and waiting .....
isn't it amazing the diversity of the people who are drawn to this thing? surely we are not all delusional fans <!-- s:o -->:o<!-- s:o --> <!-- s;) -->;)<!-- s;) -->
On second thought ... makes no sense Katherine to process AEG now. A process must be documented and if the family was without contact with Michael, they would not know what was going on, agree?
So what makes sense for me is: Michael is suing AEG due to the mess of the 50 concerts ... maybe he has really been fooled, thinking they were only 10 shows and is now taking appropriate action.
Too good to be true, huh! <!-- s:P -->:P<!-- s:P -->
That's a very good point AnaMarcia! Who would have been able to put so much detail into this document???? Who indeed!
i hope that i have not gotten too preachy on you.[/quote]
Actually, you misunderstand me. I am not looking for anything. I am trying to share what I already know. I am trying to help others understand what has already been revealed to me in July 2009.
For the truth to be believed it can not be told, it must be investigated and discovered for oneself, through discovery one comes to understand and through understanding one comes to believe.[/quote]
Exactly! Nothing to look for, it's all here now... it's all going as planned
Also if he was in drugs and i doubth this too, also is posible they profit him to sign things while he was drugged... <!-- s:( -->:(<!-- s:( -->
anyone have an idea of how hard it would be to drug someone without their consent?
also if there is the possibility of doubles does that have to mean that michael was the one using them?
"I never gave any specific number other than “more than three”; but if you read all my posts, you will find that I myself did mention several specifically involved with the hoax: MJ, family, Conrad, Kenny Ortega, coroner, hospital, FBI, TMZ, etc. And there are many others (friends/celebrities) who may not have a direct role, and yet understand that it’s a hoax (much like us)."
TS said that in his post, Silencing the Critics, and $999 REwarD??? You bET
So Kenny Ortega is involved in the Hoax .. this demand is real? <!-- s8-) -->8-)<!-- s8-) -->
After believing that the document could be inaccurate, especially the catalogue part, I now have remembered that Louis Farrakhan said the same thing in his speech regarding the crucifiction of Michael Jackson... He says that MJ was in trouble a week before he "passed" and that his lawyer made a phone call to him needing "help". Have a listen.......
<!-- m -->http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VfoEQQxHoZ8&NR=1<!-- m -->
[youtube:1xj0gnzt]
I know this has all been said I am just agreeing <!-- s:) -->:)<!-- s:) -->
It does seem EXTREMLEY odd to start a law suit against AEG NOW after a year+
They should have been immidiatley sued along with Murray,especially since they were the ones employing him(IF it was all real which we all know it is NOT).
I also don't think if Katherine+the family had any suspicions surrounding Kenny O and his involvement that they would of had him give a speech at the memorial.He was also at the premier with the rest of the J brothers in October.I don't think my family would want my killers present at my send off tbh...
Everyone suspected the Dr,but Kenny was part of it back then,his whole involvement with AEG and TII isn't a brand new revelation,it's a massively delayed reaction.
The legal document-and I haven't been in Entertainment law for 30years like the person commented earlier but did take it as part of my Entertainment management degree- does not appear to read like it should,and as someone above me said,they can easily understand it,which most legal documents..no one who isn't in the legal profession does with ease.
The run down of events should read like a personal account of the event, a very detailed to the last detail account of what happened,the run up to,the event,and who was there,etc as I have my own law suit against a night club for breaking my wrist on my birthday in 2008 currently ongoing and my documents came through for me to sign,and it was my account more so written like facts than a story.
I also agree with the fact it would be in no way possible for the general public to obtain this so quickly and easily,this is a LEGAL document,it's not a napkin with some scribble on the back.It was only filed this week also,so there is 100% leaking going on...an just like TMZ.. strike again
Thanks for the videos above me,watching them now <!-- s:) -->:)<!-- s:) -->
Also if he was in drugs and i doubth this too, also is posible they profit him to sign things while he was drugged... <!-- s:( -->:(<!-- s:( -->
anyone have an idea of how hard it would be to drug someone without their consent?
also if there is the possibility of doubles does that have to mean that michael was the one using them?
To answer part of this,not 100% sure as i've never tried it (lol)but I remember that Shipman serial murder case-also a Dr and he got all his patients to sign over to him their last will and test and leave him all kinds of money.People can be fooled very easily into thinking it's the right thing to do and more so if drugged and incoherent.His youngest victim was 41-so younger than Michael and nothing to do with age,here is a piece of that story:
"Lawyer Angela Woodruff, became concerned when solicitor Brian Burgess informed her that a will had been made, apparently by her mother (although there were doubts about its authenticity). The will excluded her and her children, but left £386,000 to Shipman. Burgess told Woodruff to report it, and went to the police, who began an investigation.the body was exhumed, and when examined found to contain traces of diamorphine (heroin), often used for pain control in terminal cancer patients.The police then investigated other deaths Shipman had certified,They discovered a pattern of his administering lethal overdoses of diamorphine, signing patients' death certificates, and then forging medical recordsindicating they had been in poor health"
Some of that sound familiar?Not exactly the same story...but similar.He was drugging them with heroin and making them sign their wills over to him,even though they were fake,he had been getting away with it for years.Think he murdered 218people+ in this way.
So the answer I guess is,if you know what your doing with a needle and drug bottle.....then you have the ability it incapacitate someone however you want.
I honestly do not think it is strange to file a civil lawsuit in the time frame that the Jackson family did. Having said that, I am not saying that the lawsuit is not part of a hoax. When there are criminal charges pending, usually lawyers wait until the criminal charges are dealt with, this way any evidence that is used in the criminal trial can be used in the civil trial where the burden of proof is also less than the burden of proof in a criminal trial.
I honestly do not think it is strange to file a civil lawsuit in the time frame that the Jackson family did. Having said that, I am not saying that the lawsuit is not part of a hoax. When there are criminal charges pending, usually lawyers wait until the criminal charges are dealt with, this way any evidence that is used in the criminal trial can be used in the civil trial where the burden of proof is also less than the burden of proof in a criminal trial.
And I'm not a lawyer or anything, but isn't it normal procedure to gather enough evidence first, before you can bring someone to trial??
In other words, now that MJ is out of the way, the guilty can be caught in action, robbing the estate of its money, due to a fake will, or letting AEG simmer and see what they are really up to. MJ did say " I'll play with them for a while". (meaning AEG) I'll button up my shirt or jacket or whatever it is, I'll snap my fingers and then BAM !!!
These cases can take a long time. The Lawyers have to gather enough evidence first..
Comments
I don't think so....What they did to Michael was fraudulent, and especially if there was a conspiracy to Murder for his catalogue..If this is a more serious matter and MJ is in witness protection, then this is how the FBI will fish them out..
it does seem strange that he would put up the catalog when that is the thing he has been so sure that everyone wanted.
was that the bait or was he in that big of a mess ?
how do the might the elvis parallels play into the aspect of the suit of katherine?
The suit is a fraud, a hoax within a hoax. Elvis is a separate aspect of this entire tale. We have the "Final Shows", the different acts of the play, separate stories that are connected through Michael that bring the entire "picture" to the screens, the big screen, the TV screen and the one within our minds. Elvis is the one who came before, to pave the way, test the waters, sound the trumpet even.
so you are comparing elvis to john the baptist?
Is there some commonalities that you are aware of, between the two, that you can share or do I go read up on that? <!-- s:D -->:D<!-- s:D -->
WHAT IF...
MICHAEL "DIED"
AEG BUY THE STORY OF THE DEAD, MADE MEMORIAL, MADE FUNERAL... ALL AEG ... (FILMED HQ <!-- s;) -->;)<!-- s;) --> )
THEY DO THE MOVIE, THE CD...
WHO IS PROFITING OF THE "DEATH"????
THE KIDS NAME´S ARE WRONG OR ARE THE TRUE NAMES?
PRINCE: MICHAEL JOSEPH JACKSON JR.
PARIS: PARIS-MICHAEL KATHERINE JACKSON
BLANKET: PRINCE MICHAEL JACKSON II
WHY BLANKET THE II IF PRINCE IS NOT CALLED PRINCE?
AND PRINCE IS MICHAEL JOSEPH JACKSON JR FOR US TO BUY THE STORY OF MICHAEL JOSEPH DEAD?
michael was obviously very much into symbolism.
serenity what will you do if michael never returns? i am sitting here with tears over you.you seem to want to much to find something that is missing .you seem to trust michael so much. won't you take just a little time to consider who michael trusted?
my most favorite part of the wizard of oz <!-- s:o -->:o<!-- s:o --> <!-- s:shock: -->:shock:<!-- s:shock: --> <!-- s:evil: -->:evil:<!-- s:evil: --> <!-- s;) -->;)<!-- s;) --> is when glinda ask dorothy what she has learned and dorothy's answer " if i ever again go looking for my hearts desire i won't look any further than my own back yard. because if it isn't there i never really lost to begin with"
michael has been putting jesus right in front of your eyes for a very long time. can you imagine how distraught he would be to think that you couldn't take your eyes off of him long enough to see.
"just because it's in print doesn't mean it's the gospel"
do you think he would have made this comparison if it didn't mean something to him?
i hope that i have not gotten too preachy on you.
For the truth to be believed it can not be told, it must be investigated and discovered for oneself, through discovery one comes to understand and through understanding one comes to believe.
Shelby, with your legal background thanks for your take on the document. I agree, it didn't read like a legal document and the reason I say that is because I could understand it! It's like laying the story out for the average (non legal) person. Watching and waiting .....
That's a very good point AnaMarcia! Who would have been able to put so much detail into this document???? Who indeed!
Actually, you misunderstand me. I am not looking for anything. I am trying to share what I already know. I am trying to help others understand what has already been revealed to me in July 2009.
For the truth to be believed it can not be told, it must be investigated and discovered for oneself, through discovery one comes to understand and through understanding one comes to believe.[/quote]
Exactly! Nothing to look for, it's all here now... it's all going as planned
anyone have an idea of how hard it would be to drug someone without their consent?
also if there is the possibility of doubles does that have to mean that michael was the one using them?
TS said that in his post, Silencing the Critics, and $999 REwarD??? You bET
So Kenny Ortega is involved in the Hoax .. this demand is real? <!-- s8-) -->8-)<!-- s8-) -->
<!-- m -->http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VfoEQQxHoZ8&NR=1<!-- m -->
[youtube:1xj0gnzt]
[youtube:1xj0gnzt]
[youtube:1xj0gnzt]
It does seem EXTREMLEY odd to start a law suit against AEG NOW after a year+
They should have been immidiatley sued along with Murray,especially since they were the ones employing him(IF it was all real which we all know it is NOT).
I also don't think if Katherine+the family had any suspicions surrounding Kenny O and his involvement that they would of had him give a speech at the memorial.He was also at the premier with the rest of the J brothers in October.I don't think my family would want my killers present at my send off tbh...
Everyone suspected the Dr,but Kenny was part of it back then,his whole involvement with AEG and TII isn't a brand new revelation,it's a massively delayed reaction.
The legal document-and I haven't been in Entertainment law for 30years like the person commented earlier but did take it as part of my Entertainment management degree- does not appear to read like it should,and as someone above me said,they can easily understand it,which most legal documents..no one who isn't in the legal profession does with ease.
The run down of events should read like a personal account of the event, a very detailed to the last detail account of what happened,the run up to,the event,and who was there,etc as I have my own law suit against a night club for breaking my wrist on my birthday in 2008 currently ongoing and my documents came through for me to sign,and it was my account more so written like facts than a story.
I also agree with the fact it would be in no way possible for the general public to obtain this so quickly and easily,this is a LEGAL document,it's not a napkin with some scribble on the back.It was only filed this week also,so there is 100% leaking going on...an just like TMZ.. strike again
Thanks for the videos above me,watching them now <!-- s:) -->:)<!-- s:) -->
To answer part of this,not 100% sure as i've never tried it (lol)but I remember that Shipman serial murder case-also a Dr and he got all his patients to sign over to him their last will and test and leave him all kinds of money.People can be fooled very easily into thinking it's the right thing to do and more so if drugged and incoherent.His youngest victim was 41-so younger than Michael and nothing to do with age,here is a piece of that story:
"Lawyer Angela Woodruff, became concerned when solicitor Brian Burgess informed her that a will had been made, apparently by her mother (although there were doubts about its authenticity). The will excluded her and her children, but left £386,000 to Shipman. Burgess told Woodruff to report it, and went to the police, who began an investigation.the body was exhumed, and when examined found to contain traces of diamorphine (heroin), often used for pain control in terminal cancer patients.The police then investigated other deaths Shipman had certified,They discovered a pattern of his administering lethal overdoses of diamorphine, signing patients' death certificates, and then forging medical records indicating they had been in poor health"
Some of that sound familiar?Not exactly the same story...but similar.He was drugging them with heroin and making them sign their wills over to him,even though they were fake,he had been getting away with it for years.Think he murdered 218people+ in this way.
So the answer I guess is,if you know what your doing with a needle and drug bottle.....then you have the ability it incapacitate someone however you want.
like with o.j.?
In other words, now that MJ is out of the way, the guilty can be caught in action, robbing the estate of its money, due to a fake will, or letting AEG simmer and see what they are really up to. MJ did say " I'll play with them for a while". (meaning AEG) I'll button up my shirt or jacket or whatever it is, I'll snap my fingers and then BAM !!!
These cases can take a long time. The Lawyers have to gather enough evidence first..
Just my thoughts....it's all for L.O.V.E xoxoxo