judith hill interview when asked how did she hear about michaels passing " when i got to rehearsal they told me lightman was on" and interviewer said " so when lightman came on then that meant michael was gone" and she said "yes".
so did michael let them know he was going to leave one day but wouldnt tell them what day and to look for lightman?
hmmm very interesting find. I didnt think about that <!-- s:? -->:?<!-- s:? -->
judith hill interview when asked how did she hear about michaels passing " when i got to rehearsal they told me lightman was on" and interviewer said " so when lightman came on then that meant michael was gone" and she said "yes".
so did michael let them know he was going to leave one day but wouldnt tell them what day and to look for lightman?
hmmm very interesting find. I didnt think about that <!-- s:? -->:?<!-- s:? -->
Well this is weird.. i haven´t seen this before... so i went to youtube to watch it... and I found this you´re saying here...
but I also found another interview when she says she knew before going to rehersal.... tell me if there something I´m missing... because my language is not english..... but I think there is a contradiction here....
i think those were two different interviews. i dont think judith remembers where she was or what she was doing when she got the news. and that seems to be a pattern for just about everyone associated with michael including his family. which is a good thing because that gives us all the more reason to beLIEve.
Can someone please try to explain to me what's the exact difference between the words PAIN and PAINS?
I've read so much about that, but still don't know it (couldn't find pains in my dictionary either).
It seems so importent.
I'll go to sleep now (it's very late here) and hope to know the answer tomorrow .... <!-- s:P -->:P<!-- s:P -->
Can someone please try to explain to me what's the exact difference between the words PAIN and PAINS?
I've read so much about that, but still don't know it (couldn't find pains in my dictionary either).
It seems so importent.
I'll go to sleep now (it's very late here) and hope to know the answer tomorrow .... <!-- s:P -->:P<!-- s:P -->
It's not that there's that much of a difference between the two words, but fact is that there's no known recording of Michael ever saying "pains" instead of "pain". So, with him "saying" that at the memorial... people thought it might be a clue, that Michael might've actually spoken this for the memorial. <!-- s:) -->:)<!-- s:) -->
Here in Germany was the "Semper Opernball" in Dresden, Eastgermany. LaToya was there because Michael was honored with another award for his charitythings.
She talked about him as a human being. It was a wonderful speech. And at the end she said something like
" I think, Michael is watching everyone of us, he's smiling right now..." or something like that
Here's the video....just ignore this awful german translator <!-- s:D -->:D<!-- s:D -->
Can someone please try to explain to me what's the exact difference between the words PAIN and PAINS?
I've read so much about that, but still don't know it (couldn't find pains in my dictionary either).
It seems so importent.
I'll go to sleep now (it's very late here) and hope to know the answer tomorrow .... <!-- s:P -->:P<!-- s:P -->
Me too, I was wondering about the meaning. Now, my german dictionary says :
to be at pains to do something=to make great effort to do something
to take pains over something=to be in great effort with something
So I decided for me that pains in the song means something like:in my great effort .And then two sentences further: in the promise of another tomorrrow, I´ll never let you part.
it is very nice, but then when she says "he is smiling at us, this is so much what he wants" , there comes this fairy tale feeling over me, almost surrealistic. I do not doubt that she feels connected to Michael`s spirit and wants to express love and respect,but this definately got me hesitating in a positive way <!-- s:D -->:D<!-- s:D -->
it is very nice, but then when she says "he is smiling at us, this is so much what he wants" , there comes this fairy tale feeling over me, almost surrealistic. I do not doubt that she feels connected to Michael`s spirit and wants to express love and respect,but this definately got me hesitating in a positive way <!-- s:D -->:D<!-- s:D -->
Yes. maybe it is not really a slip up.....just a sign or something...but I thought I share it with you <!-- s:) -->:)<!-- s:) -->
Jermaine says: ..and the type of person that he was and still..( he realises and puts his finger on his mouth)..uh,well always will/would be..
Maybe he still feels very much in touch with MJ and therefore speaks as if he still IS, but the fact that he moves his finger to his mouth confirms his awareness of saying something he shouldn`t .
Also, I find this interview interesting regarding the political issue, blaming the US government very obviously and supporting islam and the gulf countries on this arabian broadcaster.
Jermaine says: ..and the type of person that he was and still..( he realises and puts his finger on his mouth)..uh,well always will/would be..
Maybe he still feels very much in touch with MJ and therefore speaks as if he still IS, but the fact that he moves his finger to his mouth confirms his awareness of saying something he shouldn`t .
Also, I find this interview interesting regarding the political issue, blaming the US government very obviously and supporting islam and the gulf countries on this arabian broadcaster.
OOPS! A great Slip Up, love it. and yeah it is very interesting what he says
To me that means nothing, still always will be. That can be taken so many ways. Like I said in another forum, you can take any event and analyze the crap out of every single statement made and take it out of context like I have seen done on here so many times and make it sound like what you want to believe.
Jermaine says: ..and the type of person that he was and still..( he realises and puts his finger on his mouth)..uh,well always will/would be..
Maybe he still feels very much in touch with MJ and therefore speaks as if he still IS, but the fact that he moves his finger to his mouth confirms his awareness of saying something he shouldn`t .
Also, I find this interview interesting regarding the political issue, blaming the US government very obviously and supporting islam and the gulf countries on this arabian broadcaster.
He said 'the type of person that he was and he still always will be".
I don't really regard that as a slip-up. Thanks for the video though, had not seen it yet.
To me that means nothing, still always will be. That can be taken so many ways. Like I said in another forum, you can take any event and analyze the crap out of every single statement made and take it out of context like I have seen done on here so many times and make it sound like what you want to believe.
I agree with you there are to many information taken out of context. A lot of things are not good analyzed and are not based on facts. It sucks sometimes and misleads people so badly. I do not like how information are sometimes switched.
How about when they announced on the news that MJ just died and he was cremated? Then, later on, they changed their story at the memorial saying that they could not show his face because it was badly damaged from CPR? That's a pretty serious slip up or goof up. LOL.
How about when they announced on the news that MJ just died and he was cremated? Then, later on, they changed their story at the memorial saying that they could not show his face because it was badly damaged from CPR? That's a pretty serious slip up or goof up. LOL.
Or it's just the media being themselves as usual, saying one thing one minute and then another thing the next minute. It would be interesting however to know who told them this, family members? Then it's questionable...
Do you think Jermain helped him to hoax his death?? In this interview he says:'I told him he needs to get outta here cause their trying to hard to do something to him'
So he was knew he was being threatened and his life was in danger?
a coworker of mine, his cousin works at ucla medical and he told him that he was the one that went in and tagged mj and that he looked like an old asian guy bald and very white and very very cold and already somewhat stiff so wouldve been dead for a while. also he said he looked nothing like Mj. at first i just took it for what he said, but now that i am doubting mjS death i wonder why the cousin wouldnt mention his face was completely bruised or "messed up".
my[KING]"]a coworker of mine, his cousin works at ucla medical and he told him that he was the one that went in and tagged mj and that he looked like an old asian guy bald and very white and very very cold and already somewhat stiff so wouldve been dead for a while. also he said he looked nothing like Mj. at first i just took it for what he said, but now that i am doubting mjS death i wonder why the cousin wouldnt mention his face was completely bruised or "messed up".
Well, we know that's definitely not the same as the ambulance picture then. Hmm...
Kenny Ortega on Oprah Winfrey Show - ''Its hard to understand he is STILL not with us'' and Oprah even corrects him and replies ''...that he is not with us''.
Yes and also on Oprah's show he says: "he's just so much alive to me, thank god!"
I love this thread. <!-- s:) -->:)<!-- s:) -->
I can see when a person says that he just so much alive to me but it's the thank God part that got me.
my[KING]"]a coworker of mine, his cousin works at ucla medical and he told him that he was the one that went in and tagged mj and that he looked like an old asian guy bald and very white and very very cold and already somewhat stiff so wouldve been dead for a while. also he said he looked nothing like Mj. at first i just took it for what he said, but now that i am doubting mjS death i wonder why the cousin wouldnt mention his face was completely bruised or "messed up".
I was told the exact same thing from someone on YT, ok not the most reliable source but it freaked me out. So I made a post about it here on the forum and people brought me down on earth again <!-- s:P -->:P<!-- s:P --> This person said that his/her friend worked at the UCLA and that he did the toe tagging on Michael but then people here on the forum made it clear that they don't use toetags anymore, at least not at UCLA! So that's quite a giveaway. These people must of heard about the "autopsy" report and based their stories on that. Although in the back of my mind I'm worrying that it could be true <!-- s --><!-- s --> I guess since we're not certain about anything it's difficult to just shake things off...
Comments
Well this is weird.. i haven´t seen this before... so i went to youtube to watch it... and I found this you´re saying here...
<!-- m -->http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Td_-_y1Dyg4<!-- m -->
but I also found another interview when she says she knew before going to rehersal.... tell me if there something I´m missing... because my language is not english..... but I think there is a contradiction here....
<!-- m -->http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rxaBSUjzCkY<!-- m -->
I've read so much about that, but still don't know it (couldn't find pains in my dictionary either).
It seems so importent.
I'll go to sleep now (it's very late here) and hope to know the answer tomorrow .... <!-- s:P -->:P<!-- s:P -->
It's not that there's that much of a difference between the two words, but fact is that there's no known recording of Michael ever saying "pains" instead of "pain". So, with him "saying" that at the memorial... people thought it might be a clue, that Michael might've actually spoken this for the memorial. <!-- s:) -->:)<!-- s:) -->
I thought the word pains had a complete different meaning.
But it's more simpel though ... <!-- s;) -->;)<!-- s;) -->
Here in Germany was the "Semper Opernball" in Dresden, Eastgermany. LaToya was there because Michael was honored with another award for his charitythings.
She talked about him as a human being. It was a wonderful speech. And at the end she said something like
" I think, Michael is watching everyone of us, he's smiling right now..." or something like that
Here's the video....just ignore this awful german translator <!-- s:D -->:D<!-- s:D -->
<!-- m -->http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0JMctb-Wc1g<!-- m -->
Me too, I was wondering about the meaning. Now, my german dictionary says :
to be at pains to do something=to make great effort to do something
to take pains over something=to be in great effort with something
So I decided for me that pains in the song means something like:in my great effort .And then two sentences further: in the promise of another tomorrrow, I´ll never let you part.
Anybody else who gets more out of this?
it is very nice, but then when she says "he is smiling at us, this is so much what he wants" , there comes this fairy tale feeling over me, almost surrealistic. I do not doubt that she feels connected to Michael`s spirit and wants to express love and respect,but this definately got me hesitating in a positive way <!-- s:D -->:D<!-- s:D -->
Yes. maybe it is not really a slip up.....just a sign or something...but I thought I share it with you <!-- s:) -->:)<!-- s:) -->
<!-- m -->http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jGHWLI0491Y<!-- m -->
Watch from 06.30 till 06.50, at 06.41 it happens
Jermaine says: ..and the type of person that he was and still..( he realises and puts his finger on his mouth)..uh,well always will/would be..
Maybe he still feels very much in touch with MJ and therefore speaks as if he still IS, but the fact that he moves his finger to his mouth confirms his awareness of saying something he shouldn`t .
Also, I find this interview interesting regarding the political issue, blaming the US government very obviously and supporting islam and the gulf countries on this arabian broadcaster.
OOPS! A great Slip Up, love it. and yeah it is very interesting what he says
I don't really regard that as a slip-up. Thanks for the video though, had not seen it yet.
I agree with you there are to many information taken out of context. A lot of things are not good analyzed and are not based on facts. It sucks sometimes and misleads people so badly. I do not like how information are sometimes switched.
Or it's just the media being themselves as usual, saying one thing one minute and then another thing the next minute. It would be interesting however to know who told them this, family members? Then it's questionable...
So he was knew he was being threatened and his life was in danger?
Well, we know that's definitely not the same as the ambulance picture then. Hmm...
I can see when a person says that he just so much alive to me but it's the thank God part that got me.
I got this off of Twitter. I'm following Kenny Ortega.
This is another one of Kenny Ortega's tweets. Let me ask you one question. Who is he?
I was told the exact same thing from someone on YT, ok not the most reliable source but it freaked me out. So I made a post about it here on the forum and people brought me down on earth again <!-- s:P -->:P<!-- s:P --> This person said that his/her friend worked at the UCLA and that he did the toe tagging on Michael but then people here on the forum made it clear that they don't use toetags anymore, at least not at UCLA! So that's quite a giveaway. These people must of heard about the "autopsy" report and based their stories on that. Although in the back of my mind I'm worrying that it could be true <!-- s