I disagree! I found a pitcure of Michael from the same day and there is clearly diffrent angels and lighting which makes you think it's diffrent ears. But it's the same and it is Michael all the way! Will provide you with a pic which demonstrates my opinion.
Darn! I can't get the image to show. <!-- s --><!-- s -->
I disagree! I found a pitcure of Michael from the same day and there is clearly diffrent angels and lighting which makes you think it's diffrent ears. But it's the same and it is Michael all the way! Will provide you with a pic which demonstrates my opinion.
Darn! I can't get the image to show. <!-- s --><!-- s -->
Here's a nice comparison pic for you, pics were taken in 1989 and 1990...
[/b]
There are several things wrong with comparing these two photographs.
1. The two pictures are taken from completely different angles. So the ears can not be compared exactly. This difference in angle can make it appear that there are differences in shape etc when there may not be.
2. Michael's head is tilted differently in the two photographs, this again creates angle differences.
3. Lighting and shadow must be considered as the conditions under which each photograph was taken are also different. Due to angles already mentioned in points 1 & 2 this can lead to what may at first appear to be differences when there may not be any.
4. The pictures are different sizes. This makes the ears and anything that may distinguish them unable to be compared adequately.
To sum it up, you can not compare any photograph unless they are taken from exactly the same position, the head must also be in the same position, the lighting conditions must be the same and the size of the pictures also has to be the same. Distortions can be caused by any of these and there are probably other things to consider as well.
Even the following comparison is not accurate due to the above mentioned flaws.
i don't care what anybody says, Michael used doubles throughout his whole career. I've never seen a celebrity with different shape ears ever time he or she is in public except Michael. Please tell me why his ears always look different and don't tell me because of the angel that's straight bullshit. You can post will smith ears in every angel and i bet you his ears would looked exactly the same <!-- s:roll: -->:roll:<!-- s:roll: -->
i don't care what anybody says, Michael used doubles throughout his whole career. I've never seen a celebrity with different shape ears ever time he or she is in public except Michael. Please tell me why his ears always look different and don't tell me because of the angel that's straight bullshit. You can post will smith ears in every angel and i bet you his ears would looked exactly the same <!-- s:roll: -->:roll:<!-- s:roll: -->
I disagree! I found a pitcure of Michael from the same day and there is clearly diffrent angels and lighting which makes you think it's diffrent ears. But it's the same and it is Michael all the way! Will provide you with a pic which demonstrates my opinion.
Darn! I can't get the image to show. <!-- s --><!-- s -->
This guy IS Michael. When will this perpetual comparing finally stop? <!-- s:roll: -->:roll:<!-- s:roll: -->
Just because the ear looks different, it doesn't mean that this man isn't Michael.
The compare of the ears is ridiculous. It will have reasons why they look like as they look.
This guy IS Michael. When will this perpetual comparing finally stop? <!-- s:roll: -->:roll:<!-- s:roll: -->
Just because the ear looks different, it doesn't mean that this man isn't Michael.
The compare of the ears is ridiculous. It will have reasons why they look like as they look.
oh really? So can explain to me why half of his ear is missing?
SHOCKING damage to MICHAEL JACKSON’s ear emerged in a close-up picture yesterday. Bits of skin and cartilage have been hacked off for years to rebuild the Bad star’s nose. Jacko has managed to hide the damage under his long hair since the late 1990s when he first had tissue removed for his reshaped hooter.
The photo taken just days ago in Beverly Hills, California, exposes the true extent of the damage. But our inset picture from 1997 shows Jacko, now suffering skin cancer, with an undamaged ear in Cannes, France.
Douglas McGeorge, President of the British Association of Aesthetic Plastic Surgeons, said the shape of Jacko’s left ear was consistent with cartilage removal from the shell. The NHS do a similar op, usually to correct noses bent in accidents. http://www.thesun.co.uk/sol/homepage/showbiz/bizarre/usa/article2475027.ece
There are several other tabloid stories including FOX News that report that Michael had cartilage taken from his ear to repair his nose. This has never been confirmed.
EXCLUSIVE: DOC REVEALS SECRETS OF SURGERY Ears where Jacko's nose came from
BY TRACY CONNOR DAILY NEWS STAFF WRITER
Sunday, August 22th 2004, 1:70AM
MICHAEL JACKSON claims he had only two plastic surgeries - but now a top doctor is revealing the singer went under the knife so many times that a piece of his ear had to be used to shore up his nose.
At his famous clinic in Germany, Mang told celebrity interviewer Daphne Barak how he stole a sliver of cartilage from Jackson's ear and transplanted it in the tip of his nose.
In Mang's opinion, the work Jackson had done on his face early in his career - a fairly subtle slimming of his nose - turned out fine. "The doctor should have stopped after the album 'Thriller [in 1982].' " Mang said. "Because after 'Thriller,' Michael Jackson was very good-looking, all was okay."
"We decided that Michael Jackson, in reconstructive surgery of the nose, should get ear cartilage," Mang said. "You make a cut here on the skin of the ear and then you take out a big piece of the cartilage on the side. "Then you make a cut on the nose and put [the cartilage] there. It's a wonderful material to reconstruct noses and repair it."
The operation, which was performed in Hoefflin's clinic, took about two hours, and then Jackson's nose was in bandages for about two weeks, Mang said. Mang pronounced the reconstruction a success. "The nose of Michael Jackson is now fine," he said. "No silicone. It's ear cartilage, and it will be okay." http://www.nydailynews.com/archives/news/2004/08/22/2004-08-22_exclusive__doc_reveals_secre.html
And then of course we have Arnie Klein from his LKL interview talking about doing further repairs to Michael's face because of poorly done previous plastic surgery.
Michael Jackson 'rebuilt his nose to ease breathing problems'
James Bone in New York July 10, 2009
Michael Jackson rebuilt his nose before his death because extensive plastic surgery had left him with breathing problems, his doctor has disclosed.
Arnold Klein, Jackson’s dermatologist, said that he stopped him from going to a plastic surgeon and began rebuilding his nose and cheeks using fillers last year.
“I thought he had a nice-looking nose... but it got to the point where it was far too thin. It didn’t look natural to me,” Dr Klein told the CNN programme Larry King Live.
“I rebuilt it, using fillers. He was beginning to look like the nose was normal again. And that’s all I wanted — and to regain the breathing passages of his nose, because there was a total collapse of the cartilage.”
Dr Klein had completed work on the singer’s nose but was continuing to treat him for severe acne and scarring from plastic surgery before his planned series of concerts in London. He saw Jackson for the last time just three days before his death.
None of us can know the extent of the truth in any of these stories. We don't know how much plastic surgery Michael had either. He was seeing Klein regularly is all we know for sure. I honestly do not for an instant believe that Michael was sharing his life and the spotlight with a double, a twin, a doppleganger etc.
There is only one Michael Jackson, he may have used look-alikes to distract large crowds, misdirect paparazzi and illusions/stunts for stage but really that is all.
he had surgery on his ears but the next day it was back to normal?? <!-- s --><!-- s --> A super human ear i see <!-- s --><!-- s --> And this picture wasnt taken in 1997, it was taken 2009. And what you wrote doesn't prove anything.
he had surgery on his ears but the next day it was back to normal?? <!-- s --><!-- s --> A super human ear i see <!-- s --><!-- s --> And this picutre want taken in 1997, it was taken 2009
Where is photo showing it is fine the next day?
The article says the "inset" picture was taken in 1997 not the ear picture you posted. The one you posted was taken in June 2009.
he had surgery on his ears but the next day it was back to normal?? <!-- s --><!-- s --> A super human ear i see <!-- s --><!-- s --> And this picutre want taken in 1997, it was taken 2009
Where is photo showing it is fine the next day?
The article says the "inset" picture was taken in 1997 not the ear picture you posted. The one you posted was taken in June 2009.
Inset Picture
I know that, but what i am saying is. if you followed Michael before his death he was constantly going to the clinic every week and you can see that his ear was normal until that day, half of his ears was missing. So can you please explain how his ears were normal most of the weeks and this particular day half of his ears were gone?
Watch from 5:00-7:16
I know we've all seen it before, but its just a reminder, about this specific topic. Just because it looks different sometimes, that doesn't mean anything.
The truth is, is that unless youre MJ or one of his doctors, we don't know how many procedures he's had and we don't know the specific date of every single time he had something done. We don't know what he was doing to his ears, he could've been getting work done on them. so what if his ears look different in pictures, a lot of things about his face look different in a lot of pictures haha it doesnt mean anything the same goes with everybody else. the fact is that his appearance was always changing so much (even his hair. he wore wigs, its not fair to compare his hair to be different even if its just the next day) and because of the fact that he changed so often it is my personal opinion that just because something looks different doesnt make me feel like its an entirely different person posing as a double. thats just the way he is.
Even if you disregard every single picture you might think is a double and are left only with the photos you think are Michael, youre still left with a face that is constantly changing. And there's nothing wrong with that because he was always beautiful no matter how he looked.
If you are so adamant with your beliefs then I am going to let you. IMO you are fooling yourself. Michael always Michael, can’t believe it’s hard to get for some.
do we have any information on how these things actually go down or are we relying on information given in reports or interviews from alleged jackson doctors?
Comments
Since when can lighting and shadow create a little "thingy" like this..?
ok, that's really creepy <!-- s:roll: -->:roll:<!-- s:roll: -->
Darn! I can't get the image to show. <!-- s
here is a link
<!-- m -->http://img186.imageshack.us/i/earcomparasion.png/<!-- m -->
it's not the same day.. The jacket is different and also the make-up...
There are several things wrong with comparing these two photographs.
1. The two pictures are taken from completely different angles. So the ears can not be compared exactly. This difference in angle can make it appear that there are differences in shape etc when there may not be.
2. Michael's head is tilted differently in the two photographs, this again creates angle differences.
3. Lighting and shadow must be considered as the conditions under which each photograph was taken are also different. Due to angles already mentioned in points 1 & 2 this can lead to what may at first appear to be differences when there may not be any.
4. The pictures are different sizes. This makes the ears and anything that may distinguish them unable to be compared adequately.
To sum it up, you can not compare any photograph unless they are taken from exactly the same position, the head must also be in the same position, the lighting conditions must be the same and the size of the pictures also has to be the same. Distortions can be caused by any of these and there are probably other things to consider as well.
Even the following comparison is not accurate due to the above mentioned flaws.
SAME DAMN ANGEL. WHY IS HALF OF HIS EAR IS MISSING
Just because the ear looks different, it doesn't mean that this man isn't Michael.
The compare of the ears is ridiculous. It will have reasons why they look like as they look.
Here is the story that goes with that photo.
SHOCKING damage to MICHAEL JACKSON’s ear emerged in a close-up picture yesterday. Bits of skin and cartilage have been hacked off for years to rebuild the Bad star’s nose. Jacko has managed to hide the damage under his long hair since the late 1990s when he first had tissue removed for his reshaped hooter.
The photo taken just days ago in Beverly Hills, California, exposes the true extent of the damage. But our inset picture from 1997 shows Jacko, now suffering skin cancer, with an undamaged ear in Cannes, France.
Douglas McGeorge, President of the British Association of Aesthetic Plastic Surgeons, said the shape of Jacko’s left ear was consistent with cartilage removal from the shell. The NHS do a similar op, usually to correct noses bent in accidents.
http://www.thesun.co.uk/sol/homepage/showbiz/bizarre/usa/article2475027.ece
There are several other tabloid stories including FOX News that report that Michael had cartilage taken from his ear to repair his nose. This has never been confirmed.
EXCLUSIVE: DOC REVEALS SECRETS OF SURGERY Ears where Jacko's nose came from
BY TRACY CONNOR DAILY NEWS STAFF WRITER
Sunday, August 22th 2004, 1:70AM
MICHAEL JACKSON claims he had only two plastic surgeries - but now a top doctor is revealing the singer went under the knife so many times that a piece of his ear had to be used to shore up his nose.
At his famous clinic in Germany, Mang told celebrity interviewer Daphne Barak how he stole a sliver of cartilage from Jackson's ear and transplanted it in the tip of his nose.
In Mang's opinion, the work Jackson had done on his face early in his career - a fairly subtle slimming of his nose - turned out fine. "The doctor should have stopped after the album 'Thriller [in 1982].' " Mang said. "Because after 'Thriller,' Michael Jackson was very good-looking, all was okay."
"We decided that Michael Jackson, in reconstructive surgery of the nose, should get ear cartilage," Mang said. "You make a cut here on the skin of the ear and then you take out a big piece of the cartilage on the side. "Then you make a cut on the nose and put [the cartilage] there. It's a wonderful material to reconstruct noses and repair it."
The operation, which was performed in Hoefflin's clinic, took about two hours, and then Jackson's nose was in bandages for about two weeks, Mang said. Mang pronounced the reconstruction a success. "The nose of Michael Jackson is now fine," he said. "No silicone. It's ear cartilage, and it will be okay."
http://www.nydailynews.com/archives/news/2004/08/22/2004-08-22_exclusive__doc_reveals_secre.html
And then of course we have Arnie Klein from his LKL interview talking about doing further repairs to Michael's face because of poorly done previous plastic surgery.
Michael Jackson 'rebuilt his nose to ease breathing problems'
James Bone in New York July 10, 2009
Michael Jackson rebuilt his nose before his death because extensive plastic surgery had left him with breathing problems, his doctor has disclosed.
Arnold Klein, Jackson’s dermatologist, said that he stopped him from going to a plastic surgeon and began rebuilding his nose and cheeks using fillers last year.
“I thought he had a nice-looking nose... but it got to the point where it was far too thin. It didn’t look natural to me,” Dr Klein told the CNN programme Larry King Live.
“I rebuilt it, using fillers. He was beginning to look like the nose was normal again. And that’s all I wanted — and to regain the breathing passages of his nose, because there was a total collapse of the cartilage.”
Dr Klein had completed work on the singer’s nose but was continuing to treat him for severe acne and scarring from plastic surgery before his planned series of concerts in London. He saw Jackson for the last time just three days before his death.
“I just was trying to get him ready to do the concert, because in the way he looked in his face he wanted it to be absolutely as perfect as it could be,” he said.
http://entertainment.timesonline.co.uk/tol/arts_and_entertainment/music/article6676674.ece
None of us can know the extent of the truth in any of these stories. We don't know how much plastic surgery Michael had either. He was seeing Klein regularly is all we know for sure. I honestly do not for an instant believe that Michael was sharing his life and the spotlight with a double, a twin, a doppleganger etc.
There is only one Michael Jackson, he may have used look-alikes to distract large crowds, misdirect paparazzi and illusions/stunts for stage but really that is all.
The article says the "inset" picture was taken in 1997 not the ear picture you posted. The one you posted was taken in June 2009.
Inset Picture
Watch from 5:00-7:16
I know we've all seen it before, but its just a reminder, about this specific topic. Just because it looks different sometimes, that doesn't mean anything.
The truth is, is that unless youre MJ or one of his doctors, we don't know how many procedures he's had and we don't know the specific date of every single time he had something done. We don't know what he was doing to his ears, he could've been getting work done on them. so what if his ears look different in pictures, a lot of things about his face look different in a lot of pictures haha it doesnt mean anything the same goes with everybody else. the fact is that his appearance was always changing so much (even his hair. he wore wigs, its not fair to compare his hair to be different even if its just the next day) and because of the fact that he changed so often it is my personal opinion that just because something looks different doesnt make me feel like its an entirely different person posing as a double. thats just the way he is.
Even if you disregard every single picture you might think is a double and are left only with the photos you think are Michael, youre still left with a face that is constantly changing. And there's nothing wrong with that because he was always beautiful no matter how he looked.
wow i dont know whats up with the video i posted above but its wack this is the one i meant to be watched...