@RandyJackson8

1293031323335»

Comments

  • MJFAN7MJFAN7 Posts: 3,063
    the will is fake, the death is fake! Yay!  :woohoo2:
  • paula-cpaula-c Posts: 7,221
    on 1343255135:
    <br />Randy Jackson ‏@randyjackson8<;br /><br />Please everyone pass this around. How can Michael Jackson be on both coasts at the same time?http://pic.twitter.com/lQ6Yl7kl<br />
    <br /><br /><br /><br />Using a double :thjajaja121:
  • MaryKMaryK Posts: 1,732
    on 1343261215:
    <br />
    on 1343255135:
    <br />Randy Jackson ‏@randyjackson8<;br /><br />Please everyone pass this around. How can Michael Jackson be on both coasts at the same time?http://pic.twitter.com/lQ6Yl7kl<br />
    <br /><br /><br /><br />Using a double :thjajaja121:<br />
    <br /><br /> :icon_mrgreen:<br /><br />If Michael Jackson can be in two places at the same time and fake a will then Michael Jackson can also be in two places at the same time and fake his death I suppose  :icon_lol:<br /><br />Just who is who and where did the second Michael go (if there was one) and how and anyway.....? Quantum leap?  :icon_lol:<br /><br />The disappearing acts.....nothing short of a miracle  :icon_e_wink:<br />
  • CCCC Posts: 2,136
    on 1343261885:
    <br />
    on 1343261215:
    <br />
    on 1343255135:
    <br />Randy Jackson ‏@randyjackson8<;br /><br />Please everyone pass this around. How can Michael Jackson be on both coasts at the same time?http://pic.twitter.com/lQ6Yl7kl<br />
    <br /><br /><br /><br />Using a double :thjajaja121:<br />
    <br /><br /> :icon_mrgreen:<br /><br />If Michael Jackson can be in two places at the same time and fake a will then Michael Jackson can also be in two places at the same time and fake his death I suppose  :icon_lol:<br /><br />Just who is who and where did the second Michael go (if there was one) and how and anyway.....? Quantum leap?  :icon_lol:<br /><br />The disappearing acts.....nothing short of a miracle  :icon_e_wink:<br />
    <br /><br /> :th_bravo: :LolLolLolLol:
  • MaryKMaryK Posts: 1,732
    Randy Jackson (@randyjackson8)<;br /><br />1) When TJ asked my mother if he should ask for temporary guardianship, my Mother told TJ NO – twice.<br /><br />2) The Estate denied Rebbie, Janet and Jermaine access to the house when they returned to home to Calabasas with a letter written by Howard Weitzman, attorney for the Estate, who is not a resident of the home.<br /><br />3) The Estate is trying to isolate my Mother from her family JUST LIKE THEY DID TO MICHAEL, in order to propagate their lies, financial agendas and to protect a fraudulent will.<br /><br />4) The same people that are trying to manipulate my mother are the same people that were involved with my brother when he died.<br /><br />5) In order to obtain temporary guardianship, TJ lied to the court. Rebbie, Janet, Jermaine and I would never harm our mother and we are doing our best to protect her and the Estate knows that. I want to know why Perry Sanders would consider a negotiation based on lies.<br /><br />6) It is clear that anyone who stands up against the Executors of the Estate - John Branca, John McClain and their attorney Howard Weitzman - is denied access to my mother.<br /><br />7) It is my fear and belief, that they are trying to take my mother’s life. <br /><br />TwitLonger - When you talk too much for Twitter
  • LoveunitedLoveunited Posts: 370
    ^^ are we back to business?<br />
  • AndreaAndrea Posts: 3,787
    He made 7 points.
  • It doesn't make any sense for them to take Katherines life...<br />If they do, the money goes to the kids.<br /><br />Katherine is no threat, she is a 82 year old women.<br /><br />That means they have to kill both katherine and the kids to gain something that I do not know what... doesnt all of the money go to charity then? Hmm...<br /><br />So Randy "cares" about his mom but not MJ's kids... <br />Thanx for clearing that up Randy.<br /><br />I'm just sayin if Parents do the most worst and disgusting things to get their kids into fame so they can become rich then it wouldnt surprise me that children would do the same to their parents... or maybe even brothers/sisters.
  • Someone help me out here--what was the status of the estate to be once Mrs. Jackson's passes...it went to the kids and to charity right?  And did the will list  those charities by name?<br /><br />I would think that until the estate debts are cleared no one really would get much of anything.  But now that the debt is nearly cleared--well that puts some real money into the estate..and into those charities perhaps. 
  • Love4MichaelLove4Michael Posts: 398
    [size=10pt]If I recall...specific charities weren't listed but a committee of sorts was named to make those determinations.  I also remember reading that once Katherine passed anything remaining in her life trust would revert to the estate ie: childrens trust.  There were comments made at the time that part of the problem was that the Trust wasn't adequately "funded" at the time of "death" meaning not sufficient liquid assets bearing interest...also known as cash to bypass probate all together.  It's all a bit confusing and I only have limited knowledge of Trusts from my own family but the main bone of contention here seems to be that this didn't all go down the way Michael intended.  That somehow the way the case (estate) was handled allowed the Executors to earn percentages (47M is the claim) off of deals struck instead of just being entitled to a Trustees fee.  That's my 2 cents based on the bits and pieces one can put together after sifting through the drama but of course I could be way off.  I do know for a fact though that the primary reason some people go to the trouble of setting up Trusts is to avoid the whole taxing probate cycle where possible. [/size]
  • MaryKMaryK Posts: 1,732
    Randy Jackson ‏@randyjackson8<;br /><br />And THIS IS WHY I AM SO AFRAID FOR MY MOTHER... <br />http://rolandmartinreports.com/blog/2012/07/roland-s-martin-exclusive-janet-jackson-others-family-members-barred-from-moms-california-home/<br /><br /><br />
  • MissGMissG Posts: 7,403
    Randy´s words are mayor words. He is positive that the state killed Michael and wants to harm his mother. This is turning to be pretty serious.
  • mindseyemindseye Posts: 980
    Definitely building a case in all the confusion.  :ghsdf:  They must have something ... maybe waiting for the estate or somebody to make the next move.  :icon_question:
  • MaryKMaryK Posts: 1,732
    Randy Jackson ‏@randyjackson8<;br />Again.. WHY would it be necessary for TJ to take guardianship of the children away from my mother when they were already in his care?
  • SimPattyKSimPattyK Posts: 4,281
    on 1343664350:
    on 1343665662:
    Randy´s words are mayor words. He is positive that the state killed Michael and wants to harm his mother. This is turning to be pretty serious.
    on 1343667825:
    Definitely building a case in all the confusion.  :ghsdf:  They must have something ... <br />[size=12pt]maybe waiting for the estate or somebody to make the next move. [/size]  :icon_question:
    I've been having the same feelings ^^ for quite some time now<br />Feels like a pot is boiling and on the verge of exploding any time now...<br /><br />Maybe that next move that the family was waiting for the Estate to make was this ---->click:  SONY / ATV MUSIC PUBLISHING SIGNS EXCLUSIVE WORLDWIDE ADMINISTRATION AGREEMENT TO REPRESENT MIJAC MUSIC CATALOG<br /><br />If Michael's hoax really includes a plan to catch "the big fish" in flagrante delicto while Michael is supposedly being dead (which I most likely think he intends to do), then we should pay close attention to every detail regarding: Michael's catalog & Michael's will <br />Those who were after Michael's money and his famous catalog before June 25th 2009 and who were death threatening him, will make their move sooner or later !! they must!! The bait is there ready for them to bite. It's only a matter of time and of how they'll do it! and where Michael is 'waiting" for them ready to come out from hiding and tell them "GOTCHA you bastards!"
  • SimPattyKSimPattyK Posts: 4,281
    Regarding all of the above ^^, this is a great quote from this thread: Janet Jackson Still Fighting To Change Michael Jackson's Will <br /><br />
    on 1345729647:
    Let's not sink into distraction about the children. Let's focus on the real issue "Confirming that Michael’s children are the beneficiaries of his estate, the statement says [size=18pt]the people who have the most to lose are “the executors and those on the executors' payroll.”[/size]
    <br /><br />I will add that probably the purpose of this Jackson family feud-Saga was to make the family look confused, non united, weak, vulnerable... this way leaving the impression that "outsiders" can do whatever they want while the family is distracted with their own issues... and also take advantage of the fighting" between its members in order to discredit them afterwards and who knows what other bait there has been set up through this whole media circus! especially with everything being related to the Estate, the will and the catalogue !!!<br /><br />I'm more and more confident in this version of the story! Michael's plan is to provoke "the big fish" to proceed to attack! this the only way he can catch "them", when "they" take action! And this kind of people (these "sharks" hungry for money), almost always attack when the victim is weak or in trouble... until then they only lurk around to catch the right moment...IDK if I am right or wrong.... but this is the way I see this right now... otherwise nothing makes sense anymore!! nothing! <br /><br />
  • MJonmindMJonmind Posts: 7,290
    Sim, sounds very possible...<br /><br />Sounds like a sting operation.  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sting_operation<br />Remember all TS's talk of entrapment?<br /><br />Love4Michael, good info.<br /><br />
  • 2good2btrue2good2btrue Posts: 4,210
    Sim, I also agree with you, and have been thinking that for many months now....<br /><br />This is a feeding frenzy.  The sharks are out, and the fish are taking the bait...<br /><br />Keep Watching....xx
Sign In or Register to comment.