These pictures are from the same clip but different angles.
In these pictures i see Michael.
Double for one movement which was in the film for 1-2 sec?
Not double, just a light was strange and its looked like a double.
Different lighting? I don't think so. Seriously guys, you have to admit this person looks nothing like Michael. I don't belive the double or twin or whatever crazy theory that has been going on since he "died", but I'm starting to think there may have been doubles in TII.
Mike has a very specific bone structure, the shape of the face does not match AT ALL as well as the ears, the mouth, the eyebrows and the nose..
The problem is...if we're right about the doubles in TII..what is the purpose? Does it have anything to do with the hoax? We'll have to find out or wait for Michael <!-- s:D -->:D<!-- s:D -->
This is so confusing...I change my mind from post to post <!-- s:shock: -->:shock:<!-- s:shock: --> <!-- s --><!-- s --> <!-- s --><!-- s --> ...I can't wait for de TII dvd to come out so I can scrutinize it <!-- s:geek: -->:geek:<!-- s:geek: --> ...but to have use a body double,what does it have to do with the hoax <!-- s:? -->:?<!-- s:? --> <!-- s:?: -->:?:<!-- s:?: --> <!-- s:?: -->:?:<!-- s:?: -->
This is so confusing...I change my mind from post to post <!-- s:shock: -->:shock:<!-- s:shock: --> <!-- s --><!-- s --> <!-- s --><!-- s --> ...I can't wait for de TII dvd to come out so I can scrutinize it <!-- s:geek: -->:geek:<!-- s:geek: --> ...but to have use a body double,what does it have to do with the hoax <!-- s:? -->:?<!-- s:? --> <!-- s:?: -->:?:<!-- s:?: --> <!-- s:?: -->:?:<!-- s:?: -->
If they used a double(s) in TII , it could have been because MJ had already left or gone into hiding so they had no choice but to use other people so they could complete the film. That's my take on it anyway.
These pictures are from the same clip but different angles.
In these pictures i see Michael.
Double for one movement which was in the film for 1-2 sec?
Not double, just a light was strange and its looked like a double.
Different lighting? I don't think so. Seriously guys, you have to admit this person looks nothing like Michael. I don't belive the double or twin or whatever crazy theory that has been going on since he "died", but I'm starting to think there may have been doubles in TII.
Mike has a very specific bone structure, the shape of the face does not match AT ALL as well as the ears, the mouth, the eyebrows and the nose..
The problem is...if we're right about the doubles in TII..what is the purpose? Does it have anything to do with the hoax? We'll have to find out or wait for Michael <!-- s:D -->:D<!-- s:D -->
Wait wait wait.. so you think at the left picture is Michael and the right is a double?
This is so confusing...I change my mind from post to post <!-- s:shock: -->:shock:<!-- s:shock: --> <!-- s --><!-- s --> <!-- s --><!-- s --> ...I can't wait for de TII dvd to come out so I can scrutinize it <!-- s:geek: -->:geek:<!-- s:geek: --> ...but to have use a body double,what does it have to do with the hoax <!-- s:? -->:?<!-- s:? --> <!-- s:?: -->:?:<!-- s:?: --> <!-- s:?: -->:?:<!-- s:?: -->
The dvd came out already, pirate version, but dvd rip, it contains the full credits.
And really good quality. After i watch it i think there were no doubles!
I need the dvd im convinced about doubles, even if they were only there for a split second.. Im sure they are there and im sure the dvd will prove this...
Im now going with the theory that YES there are doubles but instead of looking for them instead trying to figure out WHY they are there... For what reason? And was it for hoax or money???
Randy Jackson said that he did not go to TII premiere since he was not going to watch a movie his brother did not agreed upon, whatever that meant <!-- s:? -->:?<!-- s:? -->
Randy Jackson said that he did not go to TII premiere since he was not going to watch a movie his brother did not agreed upon, whatever that meant <!-- s:? -->:?<!-- s:? -->
<!-- s:? -->:?<!-- s:? --> exactly what did he mean <!-- s:roll: -->:roll:<!-- s:roll: -->
These pictures are from the same clip but different angles.
In these pictures i see Michael.
Whoa! These pictures are not the same as the ones as I have been seeing. For one they are extra crisp and they look like the real Michael Jackson, even the one in red pants. Something is going on because I know I haven't been seeing the same person in these photos and this just confirmed it.
Agree, this is so Michael for me, now its getting more, and more, and more confusing.. <!-- s:? -->:?<!-- s:? -->
I think there is just Michael, the different clothes, the sunglasses, lights, and angles, changing it a little, but everyones face look a bit different in strong light.
Here is a picture from TII: Michael without sunglasses with different hair.
@Gema
Do you have a link for what Randy said about TII?
I think there is just Michael, the different clothes, the sunglasses, lights, and angles, changing it a little, but everyones face look a bit different in strong light.
Here is a picture from TII: Michael without sunglasses with different hair.
Guys I was so sure that 02 London wans't Michael himself but after I watched a video I became sure that he was Michael himself. And I always thought that there were body doubles in TII but now I'm NOT so sure about it. I think they were all Michael himself. We don't even look the same in every picture and we can not expect him to look the same everytime <!-- s:) -->:)<!-- s:) -->
I think there is just Michael, the different clothes, the sunglasses, lights, and angles, changing it a little, but everyones face look a bit different in strong light.
Here is a picture from TII: Michael without sunglasses with different hair.
Offtopic, but he's so cute here <!-- s:P -->:P<!-- s:P -->
Comments
Different lighting? I don't think so. Seriously guys, you have to admit this person looks nothing like Michael. I don't belive the double or twin or whatever crazy theory that has been going on since he "died", but I'm starting to think there may have been doubles in TII.
Mike has a very specific bone structure, the shape of the face does not match AT ALL as well as the ears, the mouth, the eyebrows and the nose..
The problem is...if we're right about the doubles in TII..what is the purpose? Does it have anything to do with the hoax? We'll have to find out or wait for Michael <!-- s:D -->:D<!-- s:D -->
If they used a double(s) in TII , it could have been because MJ had already left or gone into hiding so they had no choice but to use other people so they could complete the film. That's my take on it anyway.
Wait wait wait.. so you think at the left picture is Michael and the right is a double?
I think this is the only picture in TII which looks like a double (but it is not, imo).
After this movement, from another camera.
So my question: do you think this is a double too?
The dvd came out already, pirate version, but dvd rip, it contains the full credits.
And really good quality. After i watch it i think there were no doubles!
Im now going with the theory that YES there are doubles but instead of looking for them instead trying to figure out WHY they are there... For what reason? And was it for hoax or money???
Agree, this is so Michael for me, now its getting more, and more, and more confusing.. <!-- s:? -->:?<!-- s:? -->
*waves* hi Eva! <!-- s:P -->:P<!-- s:P -->
i think so too.. always have!! we must be the odd one's out.. <!-- s
Agree! I believe it's our Michael all the time.
Here is a picture from TII: Michael without sunglasses with different hair.
Do you have a link for what Randy said about TII?
This pic seems to be from the auditions.
<!-- m -->http://twitter.com/randyjackson8<!-- m -->
I can't support a film my brother wouldn't approve of, so I didn't attend the screening. Also, because I know how it ends... 3:29 PM Oct 28th from web
Offtopic, but he's so cute here <!-- s:P -->:P<!-- s:P -->
NOW THESE ARE FROM THAT TRAILER!!!!!!! AND YOU MAY NEED TO ZOOM BUT SORRY NOT MICHAEL JACKSON