We don't believe it!!! It's just what a perfect lifelong disguise <!-- s:) -->:)<!-- s:) -->))) Really, didn't the net run wild thinking he was the blond lady?? Honestly, I think we all need some genuine clues to tide us all over and get some fresh info <!-- s:) -->:)<!-- s:) -->
Michael is dripping sexuality...beautiful and hot. I think he was just a good christian and a gentleman <!-- s:) -->:)<!-- s:) --> and kept out of the paps view with his women.
Please don't start something on this...it's not serious. Maybe he'd laugh and think, what a great disguise <!-- s:) -->:)<!-- s:) -->
Not starting something. <!-- s;) -->;)<!-- s;) --> And btw I never thought that he was the blonde lady. But I thought he was the old man disguised at the memorial, not at the funeral. Just my opinion of course. It would make his life turn into a hell if he decided to have a sex change just for the disguise. He can use several disguises, he doesn't need to have a sex change.
Purelove either way MICHAEL IS NOT GAY HE IS NOT A WOMAN HE IS ALL MAN....
You are so right. Something like that he could never come back, and we know the clues are because he is coming back. I never believed the blond lady either, and leaned toward the old guy too. <!-- s:) -->:)<!-- s:) -->
I'd rather be silly and joking than arguing like has been for the past two weeks don't you think <!-- s:) -->:)<!-- s:) -->))
You are so right. Something like that he could never come back, and we know the clues are because he is coming back. I never believed the blond lady either, and leaned toward the old guy too. <!-- s:) -->:)<!-- s:) -->
I'd rather be silly and joking than arguing like has been for the past two weeks don't you think <!-- s:) -->:)<!-- s:) -->))
yes, we need to laugh, but not under Michael's expense. To spread these types of rumours that is ludacris. Laughter is a good therapy..
We don't believe it!!! It's just what a perfect lifelong disguise <!-- s:) -->:)<!-- s:) -->))) Really, didn't the net run wild thinking he was the blond lady?? Honestly, I think we all need some genuine clues to tide us all over and get some fresh info <!-- s:) -->:)<!-- s:) -->
Michael is dripping sexuality...beautiful and hot. I think he was just a good christian and a gentleman <!-- s:) -->:)<!-- s:) --> and kept out of the paps view with his women.
Please don't start something on this...it's not serious. Maybe he'd laugh and think, what a great disguise <!-- s:) -->:)<!-- s:) -->
Well, I still will always believe that Michael disguised as that blond lady at the funeral, but I don't think that makes him "gay" for disguising as a woman. It was a clever disguise! Most people automatically dismiss that as not being him, just because it's displayed as a woman. Maybe that would be the reason he chose that disguise, then! <!-- s:? -->:?<!-- s:? -->
Anyways, I strongly disagree with the whole "gay" thing, and ESPECIALLY with the sex change, now where did THAT load of bullshit come from? <!-- s:shock: -->:shock:<!-- s:shock: --> <!-- s:shock: -->:shock:<!-- s:shock: -->
I think we all know if he had a sex change, then those gold pants would not have been *cough* 'stretched' so much in a certain place.. <!-- s:P -->:P<!-- s:P --> <!-- s:oops: -->:oops:<!-- s:oops: --> <!-- s --><!-- s -->
I think we all know if he had a sex change, then those gold pants would not have been *cough* 'stretched' so much in a certain place.. <!-- s:P -->:P<!-- s:P --> <!-- s:oops: -->:oops:<!-- s:oops: --> <!-- s --><!-- s -->
<!-- s --><!-- s --> <!-- s --><!-- s --> <!-- s --><!-- s --> He is Michael Fu**ing Jackson everyone. Get your head right or we will all go to the MikeDonalds together to have a big Mikeburger <!-- s --><!-- s -->
I think we all know if he had a sex change, then those gold pants would not have been *cough* 'stretched' so much in a certain place.. <!-- s:P -->:P<!-- s:P --> <!-- s:oops: -->:oops:<!-- s:oops: --> <!-- s --><!-- s -->
<!-- s --><!-- s --> <!-- s --><!-- s --> <!-- s --><!-- s --> He is Michael Fu**ing Jackson everyone. Get your head right or we will all go to the MikeDonalds together to have a big Mikeburger <!-- s --><!-- s -->
This is exactly why SD left I think. We cannot have opinions here without being ridiculed and laughed at!!! And NOBODY said ANYTHING about JERMAINE having a sex change. We are talking totally about Michael here. And no not one of you KNOWS that Michael was a womanizer etc....blah blah. No I do not KNOW Michael had a sex change but see what I mean about the topic. It cannot even be brought up without an argument and fussing. It cannot even be discussed without ridicule. Which is way wrong. I'm f*cking tired of being ridiculed here. I'm no better or worse than any one of you at investigating and what happened to leave nothing unexplored. What a bunch of Batman characters. <!-- s:roll: -->:roll:<!-- s:roll: -->
This is exactly why SD left I think. We cannot have opinions here without being ridiculed and laughed at!!! And NOBODY said ANYTHING about JERMAINE having a sex change. We are talking totally about Michael here. And no not one of you KNOWS that Michael was a womanizer etc....blah blah. No I do not KNOW Michael had a sex change but see what I mean about the topic. It cannot even be brought up without an argument and fussing. It cannot even be discussed without ridicule. Which is way wrong. I'm f*cking tired of being ridiculed here. I'm no better or worse than any one of you at investigating and what happened to leave nothing unexplored. What a bunch of Batman characters.
Good point and LOL@Batman character's.
My only thoughts on this are....
Michael did say he channeled Liberace and that
he was his Guardian Angel. annnnnnnnnnnnnd
Anything is possible....
look at the latest fruit of the month mega model....
"he" is having a sex change operation.
If this turned out to be the true....well...
Nothing surprises me....
People should live and let live.
Know what I mean?
This is exactly why SD left I think. We cannot have opinions here without being ridiculed and laughed at!!! And NOBODY said ANYTHING about JERMAINE having a sex change. We are talking totally about Michael here. And no not one of you KNOWS that Michael was a womanizer etc....blah blah. No I do not KNOW Michael had a sex change but see what I mean about the topic. It cannot even be brought up without an argument and fussing. It cannot even be discussed without ridicule. Which is way wrong. I'm f*cking tired of being ridiculed here. I'm no better or worse than any one of you at investigating and what happened to leave nothing unexplored. What a bunch of Batman characters. <!-- s:roll: -->:roll:<!-- s:roll: -->
Nefari we are not making fun of you. These are our opinions also. Oh my dear I know Michael is a womanizer .. Believe me, I am Michael's age. well he is 2 yrs older thanI, but I grew up with his music and read everything about him. Nefari i am sorry if you think I made fun of you, it was not my intent. Just the thought of Michael changing sex that is all.. blessings.
This is exactly why SD left I think. We cannot have opinions here without being ridiculed and laughed at!!! And NOBODY said ANYTHING about JERMAINE having a sex change. We are talking totally about Michael here. And no not one of you KNOWS that Michael was a womanizer etc....blah blah. No I do not KNOW Michael had a sex change but see what I mean about the topic. It cannot even be brought up without an argument and fussing. It cannot even be discussed without ridicule. Which is way wrong. I'm f*cking tired of being ridiculed here. I'm no better or worse than any one of you at investigating and what happened to leave nothing unexplored. What a bunch of Batman characters. <!-- s:roll: -->:roll:<!-- s:roll: -->
Nefari, by the way I like Batman... <!-- s;) -->;)<!-- s;) -->
This is exactly why SD left I think. We cannot have opinions here without being ridiculed and laughed at!!! And NOBODY said ANYTHING about JERMAINE having a sex change. We are talking totally about Michael here. And no not one of you KNOWS that Michael was a womanizer etc....blah blah. No I do not KNOW Michael had a sex change but see what I mean about the topic. It cannot even be brought up without an argument and fussing. It cannot even be discussed without ridicule. Which is way wrong. I'm f*cking tired of being ridiculed here. I'm no better or worse than any one of you at investigating and what happened to leave nothing unexplored. What a bunch of Batman characters. <!-- s:roll: -->:roll:<!-- s:roll: -->
First off SD didn't leave, she was banned. Second of all nobody ridiculed your opinion. We wrote our own opinions too. And we were laughing at our posts and Souza's post about Jermaine having a sex change. So no need to be offensive when people disagree with you. Well I DO know that he is a womanizer. Have you ever seen him dating a man? We all saw him dating women. Ohh God I can not even believe we're discussing about this issue. And nobody was arguing here since you made your post. Anyways, I do not even want to talk about this anymore since it is far fetched and I do know that it would hurt Michael's feelings if he read it.
I was reading this on a blog. So probably I need to post it for everyone to make their minds up. This was written by a close friend of Michael.
Anybody who genuinely knows Michael (which is none of you), knows that
Michael is straight - almost to a fault of himself, considering that he
doesn't look like the most masculine of brothas. You're so quick to
believe Scott, which is hysterical because if you knew their history,
you'd know how weirded out Michael was by Scott's advances. Michael's not
overtly homophobic, but he is old school and isn't completely
comfortable with it. However, given the nature of his profession, he has tried
his best to be accepting and because he tries to be a good Christian, he
does not judge, he leaves that to God. He still gets incredibly
uncomfortable by advances by anything remotely male....which brings us to
Scott. Scott made a pass at Michael. Michael ignored it, initially. The
second time, Michael told him to back the #### off (in more polite
language, of course...Michael was still quite young and sweet and innocent
back in the '80s, if a dude tried something similar NOW, he might get
punched in the face). They haven't spoken since then. The closest he ever
got to Michael after about '84 was that his boyfriend was friends with
Priscilla Presley's makeup artist. The two haven't spoken since Scott
tried to get all up on Mikey.
One may ask themselves, if his motive for coming forward now was out of
some sort of moral obligation and a desire to crush MJ's "strategy" of
declaring himself heterosexual, why didn't he come forward in 1993?
Maids, cooks, ex-guards, everybody and their momma was coming forward with
"claims," why not then? Or, if the motivation behind this is genuine
concern for the welfare of children and not money, why not go to the
police with the things you've seen (i.e. Scott claiming to have seen child
porn on Michael's nightstand)?
Simple, none of it happened and Scott was still livin' the life with
all of Liberace's dough. Poverty brings forth all sorts of "memories."
Isn't it convenient that just as soon as his cash stash is running dry,
he tells the world he had sex with Michael Jackson?
Please.
Let me break this down for you people and pay attention because I don't
like doing it more than once. Michael Jackson is thoroughly
heterosexual. He does not like men. He does not like boys. He likes women over the
age of 18. Shiiiiit, even before he was 18, he liked women well over
the age of 18. It's no secret within certain circles that Diana Ross was
his first. The poor guy thought he was going to marry her but she @#%$
him over with Gene Simmons and Arne Naess. He was pretty naive back
then, so he chose not to see the obvious. Then he was celibate for about 3
years, before becoming involved with a pretty, blond employee of his,
an actress from a popular '80s/early '90s sitcom, a singer that nobody
cares about anymore but was the ish back in the day, some
groupie/secretary, June Chandler (the mother of punk @#$%$ Jordan who got jealous
of mommy's relationship with Michael) and, of course, Lisa Marie. Lisa
Marie was the only one he allowed himself to become more than just
sexually involved with since Diana, that boy was sprung. Lisa Marie,
however, led him to believe they would have a family of their own, but stayed
on the pill anyway because even if she said she was a rebel, the little @#$%$ didn't want mommy dearest to get mad at her for having a lil
black child. Mike found the pills, split, messed around with a couple of
other women with the goal of getting one pregnant just to hurt Lisa (he
can be an as.shole sometimes, true) and eventually knocked up Debbie,
which, (if I didn't love and adore his children and think think they
saved his life) I would say was probably one of the biggest mistakes of his
life. He was never faithful to Debbie after they married, never even
wanted to marry her but Mike doesn't like to break his mother's heart. He
and Lisa continued having sex until 1999 (they weren't "together," they
were just @#%$), until he met his third child's mother, fell very much
in love with her, but he is his father's son, so he wasn't entirely
faithful to her, which is why they split up shortly after she found out
she was pregnant. From that time, up until right before these new
bullish allegations broke, he was pretty much a dog. No attachment, just sex.
He has no time to get attached to somebody and then depressed again
after they part ways now that he has his children. I doubt he has time for
anybody other than his children and his lawyers now.
There, you have it. Take it or leave it, but it's the truth. Mike would
hate me for putting his business out here like this, but at least it's
accurate, unlike all of the other trash going around now. He ain't my
boss anymore, so he's just going to have to put up with it.
Summary: Scott is full of ish, Michael isn't gay and he sho' as h.ell
ain't a pedophile.
This is exactly why SD left I think. We cannot have opinions here without being ridiculed and laughed at!!! And NOBODY said ANYTHING about JERMAINE having a sex change. We are talking totally about Michael here. And no not one of you KNOWS that Michael was a womanizer etc....blah blah. No I do not KNOW Michael had a sex change but see what I mean about the topic. It cannot even be brought up without an argument and fussing. It cannot even be discussed without ridicule. Which is way wrong. I'm f*cking tired of being ridiculed here. I'm no better or worse than any one of you at investigating and what happened to leave nothing unexplored. What a bunch of Batman characters. <!-- s:roll: -->:roll:<!-- s:roll: -->
Why did you bring up SD? SD left because she was talking shit behind Souza's back on .net and she got found out... and then called out on her behavior. She had no defense for her actions so she threw up a straw man of false outrage and diversion tactics and made a grand exit after which her account was deactivated. Grandiose display of blown out of proportion snowballed embarrassment followed by predictable lashing out behavior.
Not that it matters. You brought that up to try and rally support against Souza and therefor against this board because someone laughed at your baseless sex change theory. That's silly and childish and lame.
You can't seriously expect to throw out these kind of off the wall theories with no basis nor supportive information, ie: nothing to back it up, and then act surprised when people laugh at them. And if you do expect that sort of smile n nod treatment then you need to go find a kids only hoax board, because most of this crowd is way past that sort of wild, fantastical, empty "what-if" style of hoaxing. So sure, they're gonna snicker at ya. Grow a thicker skin. It's not the world's fault that you are so sensitive.
Your theory does not define you. You're theory is wacky. I'm sure you're a perfectly sane person.
Trust me, I have put up some wild fantastical "what-if" shit. But I have always backed it up. And they still laugh at me sometimes. Whatever. I'm not here to win a popularity contest. (good thing)
Just a simple question: why are we even discussing Mike's sex life in the Jermaine Twitter thread? Or even at all? Is it important for the hoax or even our business? I don't care what he does when his clothes are off or with who, it's none of my business and not important for the hoax.
"For we wrestle not against flesh and blood, but against principalities, against powers, against the rulers of the darkness of this world, against spiritual wickedness in high places."
Ok I rest my case about this after this final comment, but I have my own opinions about it and they have not changed. BUT I also do not like any insinuating that I do not know anything about Michael. I am 46 years old soon to be 47 and have followed him since I was in first grade singing in lunch lines Rockin Robin, getting in trouble for the likes of it, collecting Tiger Beat photos of him when I was in grade school. Betting money on it I would say NO he's not gay. I don't want him to be gay God forbid. But it's like a person is bowing to satan if it's even mentioned. I find that very very strange and now more than ever I am certain there are people involved in this entire mystery paid to keep us all fighting and no one can convince me otherwise. I like Batman too but I do not like characters who flip coins.
Ok I rest my case about this after this final comment, but I have my own opinions about it and they have not changed. BUT I also do not like any insinuating that I do not know anything about Michael. I am 46 years old soon to be 47 and have followed him since I was in first grade singing in lunch lines Rockin Robin, getting in trouble for the likes of it, collecting Tiger Beat photos of him when I was in grade school. Betting money on it I would say NO he's not gay. I don't want him to be gay God forbid. But it's like a person is bowing to satan if it's even mentioned. I find that very very strange and now more than ever I am certain there are people involved in this entire mystery paid to keep us all fighting and no one can convince me otherwise. I like Batman too but I do not like characters who flip coins.
I have respect especially for the ones who are older than I am and I respect you too Nefari. But what you wrote was far fetched and it would hurt Michael if he read it, don't you think so? I never ridiculed your opinion. I wrote mine. Actually you insulted us by telling that we are Batman characters who flip coins. Everyone stated their opinion about your theory. So why need to bash them by calling them names? I'm not arguing here but to me what you wrote was so wrong. The sex change theory plus name calling.
Your theory does not define you. You're theory is wacky. I'm sure you're a perfectly sane person.
You can't seriously expect to throw out these kind of off the wall theories with no basis nor supportive information, ie: nothing to back it up, and then act surprised when people laugh at them.
It's not necessarily your theory that is wacky, it's the fact that you provided no supporting information to back it up that makes it wacky.
And again:
Trust me, I have put up some wild fantastical "what-if" shit. But I have always backed it up.
It's not necessarily your theory that is wacky, it's the fact that you provided no supporting information to back it up that makes it wacky.
For GOD's sakes...Nef SAID it was a THEORY and she is entitled to her own opinion.
End of story
Just
Like everyone else is.
What is the matter with everyone here tonight anyway?
I come here to read the latest and see a bunch of bickering and bullshit.
Did all of you get together in chat and decide to have an a$$hole convention or pass around freaking Nasty Pills or something?
Well if you did...I am passing around some better ones...I suggest everybody
take one.
Don't MAKE me have to whip out my paddle
OR one of my badly typed Rants. JUST CHILL.
Every post after this one is about the hoax and Jermaine's tweets.
ENOUGH WITH THE FIGHTING, BACK TO THE HOAX PLEASE!
"For we wrestle not against flesh and blood, but against principalities, against powers, against the rulers of the darkness of this world, against spiritual wickedness in high places."
IMHO Karen is playing her role too. She is a true friend of Michael, and is playing well.
She is kind of TR for non believers. Have you thought about it?
A sort of pillar for the ppl that are crying and mourning for Michael.
As in theatre: there is a mix of protagonists that make the story believable.
both BAD characters and GOOD ones.
I agree with you ASCENSION. I've never commented anything about Karen Faye before because there seems to be a lot of animosity towards her but if I'm honest, I think she's playing her role the way she's supposed to. And you're right, it does make the story more believable to have a mix of characters - ones people will like and and ones people will dislike. She's been in MJ's life for a very long time, he would not have kept her around that long if she was not loyal or trustful. She's playing her part and doing a pretty good job of it.
By the way, I am not the only one who was blokcked by Jermaine. If he was with us (the believers) then why would he block us? Because it seems he's bothered with it.
MissChiviouss I am beyond insulted that a deadbeat like @jermjackson5 blocked me. Oh well....
Why would he block especially believers for talking about Michael being alive and being against Karen? The family supports the hoax my ass. I've seen it with my eyes.
By the way, I am not the only one who was blokcked by Jermaine. If he was with us (the believers) then why would he block us? Because it seems he's bothered with it.
MissChiviouss I am beyond insulted that a deadbeat like @jermjackson5 blocked me. Oh well....
Why would he block especially believers for talking about Michael being alive and being against Karen? The family supports the hoax my ass. I've seen it with my eyes.
I checked both of 1958_ForeverMJ and MissChiviouss accounts and they are NOT believers. But they do not like Karen Fake and wrote things about her to Jermaine. So it seems like Jermaine is trying to protect Karen Fake. I do not know why as I do not believe she knows anything about the hoax.
Comments
Purelove either way MICHAEL IS NOT GAY HE IS NOT A WOMAN HE IS ALL MAN....
I'd rather be silly and joking than arguing like has been for the past two weeks don't you think <!-- s:) -->:)<!-- s:) -->))
yes, we need to laugh, but not under Michael's expense. To spread these types of rumours that is ludacris. Laughter is a good therapy..
Well, I still will always believe that Michael disguised as that blond lady at the funeral, but I don't think that makes him "gay" for disguising as a woman. It was a clever disguise! Most people automatically dismiss that as not being him, just because it's displayed as a woman. Maybe that would be the reason he chose that disguise, then! <!-- s:? -->:?<!-- s:? -->
Anyways, I strongly disagree with the whole "gay" thing, and ESPECIALLY with the sex change, now where did THAT load of bullshit come from? <!-- s:shock: -->:shock:<!-- s:shock: --> <!-- s:shock: -->:shock:<!-- s:shock: -->
I think we all know if he had a sex change, then those gold pants would not have been *cough* 'stretched' so much in a certain place.. <!-- s:P -->:P<!-- s:P --> <!-- s:oops: -->:oops:<!-- s:oops: --> <!-- s
<!-- s
I love the BIG MIKEBURGER.. YUMMYYYYY!!!
Good point and LOL@Batman character's.
My only thoughts on this are....
Michael did say he channeled Liberace and that
he was his Guardian Angel.
annnnnnnnnnnnnd
Anything is possible....
look at the latest fruit of the month mega model....
"he" is having a sex change operation.
If this turned out to be the true....well...
Nothing surprises me....
People should live and let live.
Know what I mean?
Nefari we are not making fun of you. These are our opinions also. Oh my dear I know Michael is a womanizer .. Believe me, I am Michael's age. well he is 2 yrs older thanI, but I grew up with his music and read everything about him. Nefari i am sorry if you think I made fun of you, it was not my intent. Just the thought of Michael changing sex that is all.. blessings.
Nefari, by the way I like Batman... <!-- s;) -->;)<!-- s;) -->
First off SD didn't leave, she was banned. Second of all nobody ridiculed your opinion. We wrote our own opinions too. And we were laughing at our posts and Souza's post about Jermaine having a sex change. So no need to be offensive when people disagree with you. Well I DO know that he is a womanizer. Have you ever seen him dating a man? We all saw him dating women. Ohh God I can not even believe we're discussing about this issue. And nobody was arguing here since you made your post. Anyways, I do not even want to talk about this anymore since it is far fetched and I do know that it would hurt Michael's feelings if he read it.
Anybody who genuinely knows Michael (which is none of you), knows that
Michael is straight - almost to a fault of himself, considering that he
doesn't look like the most masculine of brothas. You're so quick to
believe Scott, which is hysterical because if you knew their history,
you'd know how weirded out Michael was by Scott's advances. Michael's not
overtly homophobic, but he is old school and isn't completely
comfortable with it. However, given the nature of his profession, he has tried
his best to be accepting and because he tries to be a good Christian, he
does not judge, he leaves that to God. He still gets incredibly
uncomfortable by advances by anything remotely male....which brings us to
Scott. Scott made a pass at Michael. Michael ignored it, initially. The
second time, Michael told him to back the #### off (in more polite
language, of course...Michael was still quite young and sweet and innocent
back in the '80s, if a dude tried something similar NOW, he might get
punched in the face). They haven't spoken since then. The closest he ever
got to Michael after about '84 was that his boyfriend was friends with
Priscilla Presley's makeup artist. The two haven't spoken since Scott
tried to get all up on Mikey.
One may ask themselves, if his motive for coming forward now was out of
some sort of moral obligation and a desire to crush MJ's "strategy" of
declaring himself heterosexual, why didn't he come forward in 1993?
Maids, cooks, ex-guards, everybody and their momma was coming forward with
"claims," why not then? Or, if the motivation behind this is genuine
concern for the welfare of children and not money, why not go to the
police with the things you've seen (i.e. Scott claiming to have seen child
porn on Michael's nightstand)?
Simple, none of it happened and Scott was still livin' the life with
all of Liberace's dough. Poverty brings forth all sorts of "memories."
Isn't it convenient that just as soon as his cash stash is running dry,
he tells the world he had sex with Michael Jackson?
Please.
Let me break this down for you people and pay attention because I don't
like doing it more than once. Michael Jackson is thoroughly
heterosexual. He does not like men. He does not like boys. He likes women over the
age of 18. Shiiiiit, even before he was 18, he liked women well over
the age of 18. It's no secret within certain circles that Diana Ross was
his first. The poor guy thought he was going to marry her but she @#%$
him over with Gene Simmons and Arne Naess. He was pretty naive back
then, so he chose not to see the obvious. Then he was celibate for about 3
years, before becoming involved with a pretty, blond employee of his,
an actress from a popular '80s/early '90s sitcom, a singer that nobody
cares about anymore but was the ish back in the day, some
groupie/secretary, June Chandler (the mother of punk @#$%$ Jordan who got jealous
of mommy's relationship with Michael) and, of course, Lisa Marie. Lisa
Marie was the only one he allowed himself to become more than just
sexually involved with since Diana, that boy was sprung. Lisa Marie,
however, led him to believe they would have a family of their own, but stayed
on the pill anyway because even if she said she was a rebel, the little
@#$%$ didn't want mommy dearest to get mad at her for having a lil
black child. Mike found the pills, split, messed around with a couple of
other women with the goal of getting one pregnant just to hurt Lisa (he
can be an as.shole sometimes, true) and eventually knocked up Debbie,
which, (if I didn't love and adore his children and think think they
saved his life) I would say was probably one of the biggest mistakes of his
life. He was never faithful to Debbie after they married, never even
wanted to marry her but Mike doesn't like to break his mother's heart. He
and Lisa continued having sex until 1999 (they weren't "together," they
were just @#%$), until he met his third child's mother, fell very much
in love with her, but he is his father's son, so he wasn't entirely
faithful to her, which is why they split up shortly after she found out
she was pregnant. From that time, up until right before these new
bullish allegations broke, he was pretty much a dog. No attachment, just sex.
He has no time to get attached to somebody and then depressed again
after they part ways now that he has his children. I doubt he has time for
anybody other than his children and his lawyers now.
There, you have it. Take it or leave it, but it's the truth. Mike would
hate me for putting his business out here like this, but at least it's
accurate, unlike all of the other trash going around now. He ain't my
boss anymore, so he's just going to have to put up with it.
Summary: Scott is full of ish, Michael isn't gay and he sho' as h.ell
ain't a pedophile.
Why did you bring up SD? SD left because she was talking shit behind Souza's back on .net and she got found out... and then called out on her behavior. She had no defense for her actions so she threw up a straw man of false outrage and diversion tactics and made a grand exit after which her account was deactivated. Grandiose display of blown out of proportion snowballed embarrassment followed by predictable lashing out behavior.
Not that it matters. You brought that up to try and rally support against Souza and therefor against this board because someone laughed at your baseless sex change theory. That's silly and childish and lame.
You can't seriously expect to throw out these kind of off the wall theories with no basis nor supportive information, ie: nothing to back it up, and then act surprised when people laugh at them. And if you do expect that sort of smile n nod treatment then you need to go find a kids only hoax board, because most of this crowd is way past that sort of wild, fantastical, empty "what-if" style of hoaxing. So sure, they're gonna snicker at ya. Grow a thicker skin. It's not the world's fault that you are so sensitive.
Your theory does not define you. You're theory is wacky. I'm sure you're a perfectly sane person.
Trust me, I have put up some wild fantastical "what-if" shit. But I have always backed it up. And they still laugh at me sometimes. Whatever. I'm not here to win a popularity contest. (good thing)
"For we wrestle not against flesh and blood, but against principalities, against powers, against the rulers of the darkness of this world, against spiritual wickedness in high places."I have respect especially for the ones who are older than I am and I respect you too Nefari. But what you wrote was far fetched and it would hurt Michael if he read it, don't you think so? I never ridiculed your opinion. I wrote mine. Actually you insulted us by telling that we are Batman characters who flip coins. Everyone stated their opinion about your theory. So why need to bash them by calling them names? I'm not arguing here but to me what you wrote was so wrong. The sex change theory plus name calling.
It's not necessarily your theory that is wacky, it's the fact that you provided no supporting information to back it up that makes it wacky.
And again:
For GOD's sakes...Nef SAID it was a THEORY and she is entitled to her own opinion.
End of story
Just
Like everyone else is.
What is the matter with everyone here tonight anyway?
I come here to read the latest and see a bunch of bickering and bullshit.
Did all of you get together in chat and decide to have an a$$hole convention or pass around freaking Nasty Pills or something?
Well if you did...I am passing around some better ones...I suggest everybody
take one.
Don't MAKE me have to whip out my paddle
OR one of my badly typed Rants.
JUST CHILL.
Every post after this one is about the hoax and Jermaine's tweets.
ENOUGH WITH THE FIGHTING, BACK TO THE HOAX PLEASE!
"For we wrestle not against flesh and blood, but against principalities, against powers, against the rulers of the darkness of this world, against spiritual wickedness in high places."I agree with you ASCENSION. I've never commented anything about Karen Faye before because there seems to be a lot of animosity towards her but if I'm honest, I think she's playing her role the way she's supposed to. And you're right, it does make the story more believable to have a mix of characters - ones people will like and and ones people will dislike. She's been in MJ's life for a very long time, he would not have kept her around that long if she was not loyal or trustful. She's playing her part and doing a pretty good job of it.
here some twitts from other people
1958_ForeverMJ Oh wow... @jermjackson5 also blocked me! @sosodeaf hmmm....
MissChiviouss I am beyond insulted that a deadbeat like @jermjackson5 blocked me. Oh well....
Why would he block especially believers for talking about Michael being alive and being against Karen? The family supports the hoax my ass. I've seen it with my eyes.
Nawww Erms @jermjackson5 blocked me. Im devo'd! But he was teaching me so much!
21 minutes ago via Power Twitter
So far, all of the blocked people are believers.
I checked both of 1958_ForeverMJ and MissChiviouss accounts and they are NOT believers. But they do not like Karen Fake and wrote things about her to Jermaine. So it seems like Jermaine is trying to protect Karen Fake. I do not know why as I do not believe she knows anything about the hoax.