The sun will rise again, bigger and brighter, emblazoned in gold…like a beacon whose physical existence was provisionally "extinguished"…but never forgotten. Those "flames" are the heart of the passionate inferno of resurgence that awaits. Some things are not meant to be ascertained but to be envisaged through delicate whispers. Just as the Earth is sure to rotate on its axis, the resurrection of a true King will indeed proclaim Hi(s)Story…and the truth shall be heard in ALL corners of the Earth. Momentarily, the world will quake, for there will be a cosmic shift in "dogma". Time is of the essence, but patience is a viture in [r]evolutionary milestones. Until then, from beyond the gates of that KINGdom----> whispers shall be heard…………….
relapse back to Aug 25 2006……….today's post, Jun 11 2011
I hope you are NOT taking the piss <!-- ssuspicious// -->suspicious//<!-- ssuspicious// --> <!-- ssuspicious// -->suspicious//<!-- ssuspicious// --> because the only reason I am still here is to see that cosmic shift in ''dogma''.
But seeing the world quake one more time would be the cherry on top.
<!-- smj_bad/ -->mj_bad/<!-- smj_bad/ -->
I do hope time has not run out though - the world is a FICKLE place as you well know. So... should Time Magazine get their presses ready to go into overdrive for a second commemorative issue?
@ Frenchbraid: we're coming from different "PERSPECTIVES." i thought he was replying to this...
didn't someone suggest a while ago that back thought michael was dead?
and this.........(sorry, don't know how to use multi-quote here)
Re: For those of you losing faith, take a look "BACK" shall
Postby bec » Fri Jun 10, 2011 5:54 pm
I wouldn't suggest to know what anyone thinks, but back did confirm the "death" post 6/25/09... more or less... depending on how you interpreted the post.
The sun will rise again, bigger and brighter, emblazoned in gold…like a beacon whose physical existence was provisionally "extinguished"…but never forgotten. Those "flames" are the heart of the passionate inferno of resurgence that awaits. Some things are not meant to be ascertained but to be envisaged through delicate whispers. Just as the Earth is sure to rotate on its axis, the resurrection of a true King will indeed proclaim Hi(s)Story…and the truth shall be heard in ALL corners of the Earth. Momentarily, the world will quake, for there will be a cosmic shift in "dogma". Time is of the essence, but patience is a viture in [r]evolutionary milestones. Until then, from beyond the gates of that KINGdom----> whispers shall be heard…………….
relapse back to Aug 25 2006……….today's post, Jun 11 2011
@ Frenchbraid: we're coming from different "PERSPECTIVES." i thought he was replying to this...
didn't someone suggest a while ago that back thought michael was dead?
and this.........(sorry, don't know how to use multi-quote here)
Re: For those of you losing faith, take a look "BACK" shall
Postby bec » Fri Jun 10, 2011 5:54 pm
I wouldn't suggest to know what anyone thinks, but back did confirm the "death" post 6/25/09... more or less... depending on how you interpreted the post.
Ah yes, quite right, he was too - I didn't see the 09 - so thought he had referred to the infamous ''relapse' post which prompted my initial response a few pages back. At any rate, debate will continue to ensue because we each have our own perspective and mine is somewhat skewered because I am cynical to the MAX after sitting in way too many boardrooms with power players watching them manipulate the masses. This particular PR machine went into overdrive a LONG time ago so it will be interesting to see (if we ever do) who in fact IS pulling the strings here. We're all just along for the ride and we are POWERLESS. It's fun to get swept up again, but the level of fervour has somewhat abated, not just for me, but for a solid chunk of the hoaxers, they've moved on. BACK's posts were ALWAYS open to interpretation, just like FRONT says, it's how we choose to frame them in our hearts that is the crux of this fascination, isn't it?
"For we wrestle not against flesh and blood, but against principalities, against powers, against the rulers of the darkness of this world, against spiritual wickedness in high places."
<br />relapse back to Aug 25 2006……….today's post, Jun 11 2011<br /><br />2+5=7<br />6+11=17…+2+1+1=21<br />21---> 7+7+7<br />2+11=13…2+6=8<br />13+8=21---> 7+7+7<br /><br />and so the Theory of 7 continues.................
<br /><br />Posted ---> by Front » Sun Jun 12, 2011 11:21 am <br /><br />but<br /><br />Post number ---> 22 at time of posting <br /><br /> :?: <br /><br />
I like numbers, I just don't always get them. <!-- s;) -->;)<!-- s;) --> I also never really looked into all the numbers stuff on this board (would probably be too complicted for me, but maybe I will look at it in the future), but with your posts now I just remembered this (and I don't know if this has been posted already somewhere, I never saw it, maybe I just missed it):
relapse back to Aug 25 2006……….today's post, Jun 11 2011<br /><br />2+5=7<br />6+11=17…+2+1+1=21<br />21---> 7+7+7<br />2+11=13…2+6=8<br />13+8=21---> 7+7+7<br /><br />and so the Theory of 7 continues.................
<br /><br />112.. 26.... 138... 21
<br /> I'm not getting it because it's not consistent. Can you explain it? Thanks! confused/ geek/ <br /><br />This must be Michael's old style of math again. I like how even in his young days he was all about 3 -7's = 21.<br />
@MJonmind, from the original post by back, do the math downward in each column, color match the result to it's place in the formula to decode it.<br />6/25/2006<br />62.. 76... 813... 21<br /><br />the formula to produce these numbers is this (best as I can explain it in a forum setting):<br />6-25-2006<br />6...2+5...62<br />6....7....6+2<br />...76......8<br />..7+6.....8<br />...13.....8<br />.......813<br />......8+13<br />.......21<br /><br />If I've some how got this wrong, anyone (hint) feel free to pipe up and correct any errors you see.
"For we wrestle not against flesh and blood, but against principalities, against powers, against the rulers of the darkness of this world, against spiritual wickedness in high places."
@MJonmind, from the original post by back, do the math downward in each column, color match the result to it's place in the formula to decode it.<br />6/25/2006<br />62.. 76... 813... 21<br /><br />the formula to produce these numbers is this (best as I can explain it in a forum setting):<br />6-25-2006<br />6...2+5...62<br />6....7....6+2<br />...76......8<br />..7+6.....8<br />...13.....8<br />.......813<br />......8+13<br />.......21<br /><br />If I've some how got this wrong, anyone (hint) feel free to pipe up and correct any errors you see.
<br /><br />You explained it better on msn:<br /><br />6/25/2006:<br /><br />you take 2006 and take the 2 n the 6 n reverse them<br />thats 62<br />then you take the 25 and add 2+5=7<br />and take the 6 of the month and thats the 76<br />add the 6+2=8<br />then take the 7 and +6=13<br />813<br />and 8+13=21<br /><br />62 76 813 21<br />
"For we wrestle not against flesh and blood, but against principalities, against powers, against the rulers of the darkness of this world, against spiritual wickedness in high places."
And on whatever date you use this, you always get a master number. 333, 444, 555 etc.
I remember TS used a formula like that one time, need to look that up though.
"For we wrestle not against flesh and blood, but against principalities, against powers, against the rulers of the darkness of this world, against spiritual wickedness in high places."
The sun will rise again, bigger and brighter, emblazoned in gold…like a beacon whose physical existence was provisionally "extinguished"…but never forgotten. Those "flames" are the heart of the passionate inferno of resurgence that awaits. Some things are not meant to be ascertained but to be envisaged through delicate whispers. Just as the Earth is sure to rotate on its axis, the resurrection of a true King will indeed proclaim Hi(s)Story…and the truth shall be heard in ALL corners of the Earth. Momentarily, the world will quake, for there will be a cosmic shift in "dogma". Time is of the essence, but patience is a viture in [r]evolutionary milestones. Until then, from beyond the gates of that KINGdom----> whispers shall be heard…………….
relapse back to Aug 25 2006……….today's post, Jun 11 2011
This means we will never SEE him?
Or something else will not be ascertained? What do you mean, Front?
I could be wrong, but I think his whole post means the opposite. That the world will soon go crazy because it is going to see the King.
But what is with numbers? Sousa and bec did a great job decoding them but the first thing that came into my mind after seeing " relapse back to Aug 25 2006……….today's post, Jun 11 2011 " was 2013.
But maybe he was referring to the same decode scheme as Sousa's one. Like we should use the same principle to figure out a date.
Thanks! The thing that confused me is the date Front put out was Aug 25 2006, not Jun 25 2006, which would be,
8+2+5+2+6= 23, and not as you showed, 6+2+5+2+6 =21.And then the way he adds the later date is inconsistent with the first date.
He adds it 6+11+2+1+1= 21, and it should be 6+1+1+2+1+1= 12.
<!-- sgeek/ -->geek/<!-- sgeek/ --> <!-- s:? -->:?<!-- s:? --> <!-- s --><!-- s --> But maybe this is math with poetic license. <!-- smj_bad/ -->mj_bad/<!-- smj_bad/ --> And Souza, it would be good to see what formula TS posted!
Thanks! The thing that confused me is the date Front put out was Aug 25 2006, not Jun 25 2006, which would be,
8+2+5+2+6= 23, and not as you showed, 6+2+5+2+6 =21.And then the way he adds the later date is inconsistent with the first date. He adds it 6+11+2+1+1= 21, and it should be 6+1+1+2+1+1= 12.
<!-- sgeek/ -->geek/<!-- sgeek/ --> <!-- s:? -->:?<!-- s:? --> <!-- s --><!-- s --> But maybe this is math with poetic license. <!-- smj_bad/ -->mj_bad/<!-- smj_bad/ --> And Souza, it would be good to see what formula TS posted!
Oh the example to display the formula that I used was 6/25/06, from back's post on 8/25/06.
It's confusing to be sure... yes math with poetic license, great way to put it!
The way he adds it is the way it ought to be added. lol. u know? don't correct the inventor.
Comments
I hope you are NOT taking the piss <!-- ssuspicious// -->suspicious//<!-- ssuspicious// --> <!-- ssuspicious// -->suspicious//<!-- ssuspicious// --> because the only reason I am still here is to see that cosmic shift in ''dogma''.
But seeing the world quake one more time would be the cherry on top.
<!-- smj_bad/ -->mj_bad/<!-- smj_bad/ -->
I do hope time has not run out though - the world is a FICKLE place as you well know. So... should Time Magazine get their presses ready to go into overdrive for a second commemorative issue?
<!-- srespect/ -->respect/<!-- srespect/ -->
and this.........(sorry, don't know how to use multi-quote here)
Re: For those of you losing faith, take a look "BACK" shall
Postby bec » Fri Jun 10, 2011 5:54 pm
I wouldn't suggest to know what anyone thinks, but back did confirm the "death" post 6/25/09... more or less... depending on how you interpreted the post.
This means we will never SEE him?
Or something else will not be ascertained? What do you mean, Front?
Ah yes, quite right, he was too - I didn't see the 09 - so thought he had referred to the infamous ''relapse' post which prompted my initial response a few pages back. At any rate, debate will continue to ensue because we each have our own perspective and mine is somewhat skewered because I am cynical to the MAX after sitting in way too many boardrooms with power players watching them manipulate the masses. This particular PR machine went into overdrive a LONG time ago so it will be interesting to see (if we ever do) who in fact IS pulling the strings here. We're all just along for the ride and we are POWERLESS. It's fun to get swept up again, but the level of fervour has somewhat abated, not just for me, but for a solid chunk of the hoaxers, they've moved on. BACK's posts were ALWAYS open to interpretation, just like FRONT says, it's how we choose to frame them in our hearts that is the crux of this fascination, isn't it?
112.. 26.... 138... 21
1+1+2+2+6 = 12
1+3+8 = 12
21
12/12/21 and also 333.
LOL, it's weird math day after all, so why not?
"For we wrestle not against flesh and blood, but against principalities, against powers, against the rulers of the darkness of this world, against spiritual wickedness in high places."<!-- s:ugeek: -->:ugeek:<!-- s:ugeek: --> <!-- styping/ -->typing/<!-- styping/ -->
6+2+7+6=21
8+1+3=12
21
21/12/21... 333
9+20+2011=2040
92... 76... 1113... 24
9+2+7+6=24
1+1+1+3=6
24
24/6/24
666
Thanks guys, I think I've sorted out the 25/6 thing - but now these numbers ..... !!!
How the hell did he figure that out?
"For we wrestle not against flesh and blood, but against principalities, against powers, against the rulers of the darkness of this world, against spiritual wickedness in high places.""For we wrestle not against flesh and blood, but against principalities, against powers, against the rulers of the darkness of this world, against spiritual wickedness in high places."And on whatever date you use this, you always get a master number. 333, 444, 555 etc.
I remember TS used a formula like that one time, need to look that up though.
"For we wrestle not against flesh and blood, but against principalities, against powers, against the rulers of the darkness of this world, against spiritual wickedness in high places."But what is with numbers? Sousa and bec did a great job decoding them but the first thing that came into my mind after seeing " relapse back to Aug 25 2006……….today's post, Jun 11 2011 " was 2013.
But maybe he was referring to the same decode scheme as Sousa's one. Like we should use the same principle to figure out a date.
8+2+5+2+6= 23, and not as you showed, 6+2+5+2+6 =21.And then the way he adds the later date is inconsistent with the first date.
He adds it 6+11+2+1+1= 21, and it should be 6+1+1+2+1+1= 12.
<!-- sgeek/ -->geek/<!-- sgeek/ --> <!-- s:? -->:?<!-- s:? --> <!-- s
<!-- slolol/ -->lolol/<!-- slolol/ --> I know EXACTLY how this guy felt!!! <!-- sconfused/ -->confused/<!-- sconfused/ -->
Any idea if this 'formula' just a clever trick with dates/numbers or does it have any significance hoax-wise?
Btw, the only reason why numerology never works in real life is time zones.
Oh the example to display the formula that I used was 6/25/06, from back's post on 8/25/06.
It's confusing to be sure... yes math with poetic license, great way to put it!
The way he adds it is the way it ought to be added. lol. u know? don't correct the inventor.
New relapse post, posted 6/11/2011, is 60 days prior to 8/11/2011, or the 777th day of this hoax.
Clever, no?