Official back & Front thread

16791112653

Comments

  • Someone here knows why Back deleted all the posts on MJJC <!-- s:?: -->:?:<!-- s:?: --> <!-- s:?: -->:?:<!-- s:?: --> <!-- s:?: -->:?:<!-- s:?: --> ?!?!
    I tried to find them now on MJJC but ...nothing.
  • Someone here knows why Back deleted all the posts on MJJC <!-- s:?: -->:?:<!-- s:?: --> <!-- s:?: -->:?:<!-- s:?: --> <!-- s:?: -->:?:<!-- s:?: --> ?!?!
    I tried to find them now on MJJC but ...nothing.

    @GINAFELICIA - Some of the links provided by BeTheChange are still working so I guess that some of the posts are still there?
    http://www.mjjcommunity.com/forum/showthread.php?p=2311759#post2311759

    With L.O.V.E
  • Thank you...my search was not complete, I'll try again <!-- s:D -->:D<!-- s:D -->
  • anewfananewfan Posts: 1,125
    Thank you...my search was not complete, I'll try again <!-- s:D -->:D<!-- s:D -->

    If you find any more posts, can you copy the link to the thread and post it on here? I would be greatly appreciative! I have looked on that site in the past (for hours and hours), and I couldn't find his posts. There are so many threads over there!! It's almost like finding a needle in a haystack...especially since they don't let you search for "Back". Good luck in your search!
  • I'll try but needs a lot of time which I just don't have.
    His last post was in november last year?!
    Anyway, I saw that forum is with the official version about Michael's death.
    I wonder if Back still posts...
    And I don't understand why when I try to search for his posts the result is zero, even if we know some posts are still there
  • anewfananewfan Posts: 1,125
    I'll try but needs a lot of time which I just don't have.
    His last post was in november last year?!
    Anyway, I saw that forum is with the official version about Michael's death.
    I wonder if Back still posts...
    And I don't understand why when I try to search for his posts the result is zero, even if we know some posts are still there


    Time is definitely an issue. I was able to spend a lot of time this summer "researching" because I was off from work. But now I am back to the grind (I teach) and I have to spend all my extra time with planning lessons etc. I still try to search every now and then. I wonder if Back posts under a new name now? I also wonder if he sometimes posts on this forum? The user callofthewild seemed to be in the know.
    It is really strange that you can't search Back.
  • magicmagic Posts: 18
    I can still search Back's posts and he hasn't posted anything since June 22,2010. Here it is

    <!-- m -->http://www.mjjcommunity.com/forum/showt ... ost2856940<!-- m -->
  • anewfananewfan Posts: 1,125
    I can still search Back's posts and he hasn't posted anything since June 22,2010. Here it is

    <!-- m -->http://www.mjjcommunity.com/forum/showt ... ost2856940<!-- m -->


    Thank you so much!! I can't search anything on that forum. Probably because I've never posted??
  • 2 Bad2 Bad Posts: 289
    Speaking of "BACK" I came across this article tonight:

    <!-- m -->http://www.newsoftheworld.co.uk/news/96 ... octor.html<!-- m -->

    Scroll down to the comment-

    "This article has 1 comment

    look who is BACK

    By jesse p.. Posted September 12 2010 at 2:14 AM."

    Eeks yes it says jesse p.
    Jessie Presley? Is this what I'm seeing?
    If this has been posted I apologize, I could n't find it anywhere and it kinda fits here with the "BACK" part <!-- s:-) -->:-)<!-- s:-) --> Yes? <!-- s:o -->:o<!-- s:o --> <!-- s:o -->:o<!-- s:o -->
  • Speaking of "BACK" I came across this article tonight:

    <!-- m -->http://www.newsoftheworld.co.uk/news/96 ... octor.html<!-- m -->

    Scroll down to the comment-

    "This article has 1 comment

    look who is BACK

    By jesse p.. Posted September 12 2010 at 2:14 AM."

    Eeks yes it says jesse p.
    Jessie Presley? Is this what I'm seeing?
    If this has been posted I apologize, I could n't find it anywhere and it kinda fits here with the "BACK" part <!-- s:-) -->:-)<!-- s:-) --> Yes? <!-- s:o -->:o<!-- s:o --> <!-- s:o -->:o<!-- s:o -->

    This is very interesting.
    And look at the time the comment was posted 2:14 2+1+4=7 <!-- s:lol: -->:lol:<!-- s:lol: --> <!-- s:lol: -->:lol:<!-- s:lol: --> <!-- s:lol: -->:lol:<!-- s:lol: -->
  • 2 Bad2 Bad Posts: 289
    Speaking of "BACK" I came across this article tonight:

    <!-- m -->http://www.newsoftheworld.co.uk/news/96 ... octor.html<!-- m -->

    Scroll down to the comment-

    "This article has 1 comment

    look who is BACK

    By jesse p.. Posted September 12 2010 at 2:14 AM."

    Eeks yes it says jesse p.
    Jessie Presley? Is this what I'm seeing?
    If this has been posted I apologize, I couldn't find it anywhere and it kinda fits here with the "BACK" part <!-- s:-) -->:-)<!-- s:-) --> Yes? <!-- s:o -->:o<!-- s:o --> <!-- s:o -->:o<!-- s:o -->

    This is very interesting.
    And look at the time the comment was posted 2:14 2+1+4=7 <!-- s:lol: -->:lol:<!-- s:lol: --> <!-- s:lol: -->:lol:<!-- s:lol: --> <!-- s:lol: -->:lol:<!-- s:lol: -->

    What an adventure eh?! So do we look to see who "BACK" is?
    Or do we look to see J Presley is back?
    Then there is that 7 again! I missed that I was stuck on BACK! OMG I need to go to sleep!
  • Speaking of "BACK" I came across this article tonight:<br /><br /><!-- m -->http://www.newsoftheworld.co.uk/news/96 ... octor.html<!-- m --><br /><br />Scroll down to the comment-<br /><br />"This article has 1 comment<br /><br />look who is BACK<br /><br />By jesse p.. Posted September 12 2010 at 2:14 AM."<br /><br />Eeks yes it says jesse p.<br /> Jessie Presley? Is this what I'm seeing?<br />If this has been posted I apologize, I couldn't find it anywhere and it kinda fits here with the "BACK" part  :o :o
    <br /><br />This is very interesting.<br />And look at the time the comment was posted 2:14  2+1+4=7  :lol: :lol: :lol:
    <br /><br />What an adventure eh?! So do we look to see who  "BACK" is? <br />Or do we look to see J Presley is back? <br />Then there is that 7 again! I missed that I was stuck on BACK! OMG I need to go to sleep!
    <br /><br />Well spotted!<br />Seeing the same thing as you! A cryptic comment left on a NOTW article from 12/09/10 entitled " I could have saved Michael Jackson":<br />
    look who is BACK
    <br />left  by jesse p.. on 12th September 2010 at 2:14am<br /><br />Is an outsider (or worse a Forum member) reading this forum playing with the Believers or is a real insider giving us yet another clue?  Please be it the latter! <br /><br />I do not know what to say!  :shock: <br /><br />The NOTW article was also published today (12th September 2010) and incriminates AEG in MJ death (
    >>>> more Drama
    >>>Bigger Thriller) though we know that such publications are trash and just interesting within the context of the HOAX and its development from FICTION into some sort of reality when the timing is right.<br />The short comment from Jesse P..  brings Back and Elvis into the discussion and if the article is of relevance re-emphasise the thrilling aspect of the Hoax! The post time  (2+1+3 = 7) links back to the New Theory of 7.<br /><br />  :shock: :shock: :shock: :shock: :idea: <br />With L.O.V.E
  • SouzaSouza Posts: 9,400

    I had read enough posts from back to know it was all too much of a 'coincidence', but now I decided to read all the posts and all I wanted to say is that whoever it is, the dude cracks me up! <!-- s:lol: -->:lol:<!-- s:lol: -->

    "For we wrestle not against flesh and blood, but against principalities, against powers, against the rulers of the darkness of this world, against spiritual wickedness in high places."

  • GraceGrace Posts: 2,864

    I had read enough posts from back to know it was all too much of a 'coincidence', but now I decided to read all the posts and all I wanted to say is that whoever it is, the dude cracks me up! <!-- s:lol: -->:lol:<!-- s:lol: -->

    Back does in fact make my wonderful padded cell look like a kindergarden sandbox <!-- s:lol: -->:lol:<!-- s:lol: -->
    Each time a theory built up - as soon as a Back comment comes into the picture - here it goes and up and away ...
    Painted in pink, Back makes it look blue.
    Got yellow stripes in it, Back gives it green measles.
    <!-- s:lol: -->:lol:<!-- s:lol: --> <!-- s:lol: -->:lol:<!-- s:lol: --> <!-- s:lol: -->:lol:<!-- s:lol: -->

    He reminds me of a pendulum.
    When we think things are going down, actually they are going up.
    I definitely keep watching. <!-- s:lol: -->:lol:<!-- s:lol: --> <!-- s:lol: -->:lol:<!-- s:lol: --> <!-- s:lol: -->:lol:<!-- s:lol: -->
  • <br /><br />And also, we have to remember this priceless treasure find by a brilliant fellow investigator......<br /><br />At 19 seconds, Michael says "KEEP WATCHIN'" in the official trailer for This Is It! 
    Now listen to the original Billie Jean intro until 12 secs....<br /> <br />
    <br /><br />Now go back and listen to the TII trailer again - I'll wait until you pick yourself up off the floor....  :lol: <br /><br />I spent years working out to MJs music and Billie Jean was one of the tracks I loved for my daily step aerobics class (as Debbie Allen said "MJ WAS the beat, honey!") I knew that track backwards. I watched that trailer over and over again before the movie came out. That sound at 19 secs was a part of the song I recognised and loved all those years. Or was it? The day I compared it to the original Billie Jean after reading about it on a post, the hair on the back of my neck stood up and I started to tremble with excitement. That day my belief in BACK as MJ was cemented. Was he telling us to Keep-a-Watchin to the end of the movie, so we could see there was no RIP when we finally got to the dedication to the children, that was placed somewhere where 99% of audiences would NEVER see it, whether watching in movie theatres or on DVD? It even came AFTER the BAM footage. Clever. The question is does KO know or did MJ manage to get the sound editor to work it into the mix without anyone realising it?<br /><br />We'll just have to KEEP--WATCHIN' <br />OMG I'm so nervous about this....why else would Back still keep his motto "keep watchin'....... ?1<br />I think I'll cry now.......<br />Love you Michael.......please be alive ....... don't let this be all an illusion.......<br />If you will come back I think I'll be the first who faints, even if I've always believed you are still alive
  • I've been fascinated by BACK for months. He always seemed legit.
    My guess is that he could be an informer who is close to Michael. <!-- s:D -->:D<!-- s:D -->
    I thought that too, at first, but the post about his mother seem so personal and the Sony post could only be MJ. There's also a post that outlines every charity event and every giving moment by MJ. There were a few on there that only MJ would know about.
    I think we have to realize that MJ may have changed after the trial. He was still pure in the heart, but he was stabbed in the back by so many friends and others who he trusted, that he needed a place to vent and to let out the anger. I think MJJC was his way of letting out what he was feeling.

    And in true MJ form, he could not help but give hints about what he was doing for the last 3 years, planning his death at the age of 50.

    I agree. I remember I've been reading he sayed he loves children but this boy - Gavin - he simply hates for what he did to him. I think it was very difficult for Michael to just forgive Gavin and I'm not blaming him for this. We all have our demons...
    We are by your side Michael, you know that...

  • Where you really banned just for sending a friend request to Back? This in itself is interesting! <!-- s:shock: -->:shock:<!-- s:shock: -->

    Have you got any interesting posts that are not on here?

    With L.O.V.E


    RunningGirl, yes interesting indeed! It was very strange and I was quite shocked when it happened because I was a member for less than 2 months and in that time I logged in maybe 4-5 times, never posted a word, and only ever went to Back's posts. On the last visit, I copied them all to add to my stash then as I was about to log out, I saw the 'friends request' link and on impulse thought "why not?" <!-- s;) -->;)<!-- s;) --> Next time I tried to login which was a few weeks later, I received this message which I copied and emailed to a fellow BACK admirer, so I still have it -

    vBulletin Message

    You have been banned for the following reason:
    No reason was specified.

    Date the ban will be lifted: Never


    Initially I was perplexed and wondered if they could tell I'd been in there a huntin' and a fishin', and only then remembered I'd sent the friend's request. I'd actually forgotten all about it because I did it on the spur of the moment and never expected a response.

    anewfan, I renamed all my screen shots after I saved them so I could tell at a glance what was on them, they are not filed by dates. I found most of them from researching this board, mjkit and MJHD, and Googling. It would take me an eternity to sort out which ones are not on this thread and I just don't have the time, sorry. <!-- s:( -->:(<!-- s:( --> You will find most of them anyway, if you research these boards like I did. I even found a couple on this thread since it's been bumped that I hadn't seen before. BACK is hysterical at times, I love his humour, he cracks me up.

    I´M BANNED TOO.. I WAS TRYING TO LOG IN TODAY, I´M A MEMBER BUT I DON´T REMEMBER MY PASSWORD SO I SEDN A REQUEST FOR A NEW PASSWORD AND THEY SEND ME A NEW ONE, WHEN I TRY TO LOG IN THE SAME MESSAGE POP UP--- BANNED FOR LIFE! I SEND AN E-MAIL ASKING THEM WHY? I´M WAITING THEIR ANSWER... <!-- s:roll: -->:roll:<!-- s:roll: -->


    @ CC & FrenchBraid.....did you use the same username as you do on this website? The reason why I ask is because this same thing happened to my friend yesterday. She uses her same username as this website. I went on to see if it would happen to me and it didn't. I even searched for "Back" using the search on that site to see if I would get banned as well. I use a different username on MJJC than I do here. (By the way...she just signed up under her husband's e-mail and didn't get banned.) I wonder what's going on?

    @FrenchBraid....I understand about the time it would take.......I have read all the screenshots as well as this thread over and over. I have also tried to find them on MJJC, but that takes forever, since you have to read through every thread to find them.....but thanks anyway!

    There's a simple explanation: the ones who believe Michael is alive are banned on the spot. I know this for sure. I made the same mistqake to use the same username as here...Something is definetly going on. I think Michael wants his AOL here, he's trying to keep us together here <!-- s:? -->:?<!-- s:? -->
  • ijcslyijcsly Posts: 128
    Ginafelicia, were you banned there too????
  • SarahliSarahli Posts: 4,265
    I have registered too but with another username. We'll see.
  • I use the same name but I have not been banned from MJJC. But I can't search BACK's post. As a matter of fact I can't serach for anything on MJJC.

    For anyone who has been following BACK for a while. I remember right after June 25th there was a member on MJJC who started a thread about BACK. Her thoughts were that BACK was MJ and the 7 day theory was his way of letting them know he was going to fake his death. Many of the members felt the same way, but some thought she was just upset because MJ had died. If anyone saved the link to that thread please post it here. Since my search tool on that site is not working, maybe someone can search the term "killuminati" or "7 day theory".and I think the thread will show up.

    Thanks in advance.
  • ijcslyijcsly Posts: 128
    i'd saved this one, dont know if this is what you're talking about

    <!-- m -->http://www.mjjcommunity.com/forum/showt ... 790&page=9<!-- m -->
  • ijcslyijcsly Posts: 128
    its saved on page 9 of that thread but ofcourse you can go back through the pages, what i did find interesting on that page 9 is the comment from "amy-grace" about 911
  • i'd saved this one, dont know if this is what you're talking about

    <!-- m -->http://www.mjjcommunity.com/forum/showt ... 790&page=9<!-- m -->

    Thanks. I love how we support each other on this forum. It's all for L.O.V.E.
  • Speaking of "BACK" I came across this article tonight:

    <!-- m -->http://www.newsoftheworld.co.uk/news/96 ... octor.html<!-- m -->

    Scroll down to the comment-
    3 comment <!-- s:shock: -->:shock:<!-- s:shock: --> :

    The Truth will Prevail, Justice will be done. Just need to KEEP WATCHIN'...

    By Lisa.. Posted September 12 2010 at 9:07 PM.

    The post time 9+7=16 1+6=7 <!-- s:) -->:)<!-- s:) -->
  • Speaking of "BACK" I came across this article tonight:

    <!-- m -->http://www.newsoftheworld.co.uk/news/96 ... octor.html<!-- m -->

    Scroll down to the comment-

    "This article has 1 comment

    look who is BACK

    By jesse p.. Posted September 12 2010 at 2:14 AM."

    Eeks yes it says jesse p.
    Jessie Presley? Is this what I'm seeing?
    If this has been posted I apologize, I could n't find it anywhere and it kinda fits here with the "BACK" part <!-- s:-) -->:-)<!-- s:-) --> Yes? <!-- s:o -->:o<!-- s:o --> <!-- s:o -->:o<!-- s:o -->
    Speaking of "BACK" I came across this article tonight:

    <!-- m -->http://www.newsoftheworld.co.uk/news/96 ... octor.html<!-- m -->

    Scroll down to the comment-
    3 comment <!-- s:shock: -->:shock:<!-- s:shock: --> :

    The Truth will Prevail, Justice will be done. Just need to KEEP WATCHIN'...

    By Lisa.. Posted September 12 2010 at 9:07 PM.

    The post time 9+7=16 1+6=7 <!-- s:) -->:)<!-- s:) -->

    Wow thanks for sharing this with us.

    Look at who else posted a comment possibly:

    With all the ingredients ---- just let it simmer ---- the "pie" will one day be done ---- and in that moment -->
    our HIStory books will be updated.......


    KEEP WATCHIN'.......

    By S.T.U.D.Y... Posted September 13 2010 at 12:27 AM.


    If this is a true comment from TS, then wouldn't this mean that TS is BACK? Hmm...this is getting very interesting.
Sign In or Register to comment.